Cargando…

Alzheimer's disease classification using cluster‐based labelling for graph neural network on heterogeneous data

Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis do not always correlate reliably with cognitive symptoms, making clinical diagnosis inconsistent. In this study, the performance of a graphical neural network (GNN) classifier based on data‐driven diagnostic classes from unsupervised clustering...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCombe, Niamh, Bamrah, Jake, Sanchez‐Bornot, Jose M., Finn, David P., McClean, Paula L., Wong‐Lin, KongFatt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9731537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36514476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/htl2.12037
_version_ 1784845924974985216
author McCombe, Niamh
Bamrah, Jake
Sanchez‐Bornot, Jose M.
Finn, David P.
McClean, Paula L.
Wong‐Lin, KongFatt
author_facet McCombe, Niamh
Bamrah, Jake
Sanchez‐Bornot, Jose M.
Finn, David P.
McClean, Paula L.
Wong‐Lin, KongFatt
author_sort McCombe, Niamh
collection PubMed
description Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis do not always correlate reliably with cognitive symptoms, making clinical diagnosis inconsistent. In this study, the performance of a graphical neural network (GNN) classifier based on data‐driven diagnostic classes from unsupervised clustering on heterogeneous data is compared to the performance of a classifier using clinician diagnosis as an outcome. Unsupervised clustering on tau‐positron emission tomography (PET) and cognitive and functional assessment data was performed. Five clusters embedded in a non‐linear uniform manifold approximation and project (UMAP) space were identified. The individual clusters revealed specific feature characteristics with respect to clinical diagnosis of AD, gender, family history, age, and underlying neurological risk factors (NRFs). In particular, one cluster comprised mainly diagnosed AD cases. All cases within this cluster were re‐labelled AD cases. The re‐labelled cases are characterized by high cerebrospinal fluid amyloid beta (CSF Aβ) levels at a younger age, even though Aβ data was not used for clustering. A GNN model was trained using the re‐labelled data with a multiclass area‐under‐the‐curve (AUC) of 95.2%, higher than the AUC of a GNN trained on clinician diagnosis (91.7%; p = 0.02). Overall, our work suggests that more objective cluster‐based diagnostic labels combined with GNN classification may have value in clinical risk stratification and diagnosis of AD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9731537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97315372022-12-12 Alzheimer's disease classification using cluster‐based labelling for graph neural network on heterogeneous data McCombe, Niamh Bamrah, Jake Sanchez‐Bornot, Jose M. Finn, David P. McClean, Paula L. Wong‐Lin, KongFatt Healthc Technol Lett Letters Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis do not always correlate reliably with cognitive symptoms, making clinical diagnosis inconsistent. In this study, the performance of a graphical neural network (GNN) classifier based on data‐driven diagnostic classes from unsupervised clustering on heterogeneous data is compared to the performance of a classifier using clinician diagnosis as an outcome. Unsupervised clustering on tau‐positron emission tomography (PET) and cognitive and functional assessment data was performed. Five clusters embedded in a non‐linear uniform manifold approximation and project (UMAP) space were identified. The individual clusters revealed specific feature characteristics with respect to clinical diagnosis of AD, gender, family history, age, and underlying neurological risk factors (NRFs). In particular, one cluster comprised mainly diagnosed AD cases. All cases within this cluster were re‐labelled AD cases. The re‐labelled cases are characterized by high cerebrospinal fluid amyloid beta (CSF Aβ) levels at a younger age, even though Aβ data was not used for clustering. A GNN model was trained using the re‐labelled data with a multiclass area‐under‐the‐curve (AUC) of 95.2%, higher than the AUC of a GNN trained on clinician diagnosis (91.7%; p = 0.02). Overall, our work suggests that more objective cluster‐based diagnostic labels combined with GNN classification may have value in clinical risk stratification and diagnosis of AD. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9731537/ /pubmed/36514476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/htl2.12037 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Healthcare Technology Letters published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Institution of Engineering and Technology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Letters
McCombe, Niamh
Bamrah, Jake
Sanchez‐Bornot, Jose M.
Finn, David P.
McClean, Paula L.
Wong‐Lin, KongFatt
Alzheimer's disease classification using cluster‐based labelling for graph neural network on heterogeneous data
title Alzheimer's disease classification using cluster‐based labelling for graph neural network on heterogeneous data
title_full Alzheimer's disease classification using cluster‐based labelling for graph neural network on heterogeneous data
title_fullStr Alzheimer's disease classification using cluster‐based labelling for graph neural network on heterogeneous data
title_full_unstemmed Alzheimer's disease classification using cluster‐based labelling for graph neural network on heterogeneous data
title_short Alzheimer's disease classification using cluster‐based labelling for graph neural network on heterogeneous data
title_sort alzheimer's disease classification using cluster‐based labelling for graph neural network on heterogeneous data
topic Letters
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9731537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36514476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/htl2.12037
work_keys_str_mv AT mccombeniamh alzheimersdiseaseclassificationusingclusterbasedlabellingforgraphneuralnetworkonheterogeneousdata
AT bamrahjake alzheimersdiseaseclassificationusingclusterbasedlabellingforgraphneuralnetworkonheterogeneousdata
AT sanchezbornotjosem alzheimersdiseaseclassificationusingclusterbasedlabellingforgraphneuralnetworkonheterogeneousdata
AT finndavidp alzheimersdiseaseclassificationusingclusterbasedlabellingforgraphneuralnetworkonheterogeneousdata
AT mccleanpaulal alzheimersdiseaseclassificationusingclusterbasedlabellingforgraphneuralnetworkonheterogeneousdata
AT wonglinkongfatt alzheimersdiseaseclassificationusingclusterbasedlabellingforgraphneuralnetworkonheterogeneousdata
AT alzheimersdiseaseclassificationusingclusterbasedlabellingforgraphneuralnetworkonheterogeneousdata