Cargando…
Innovative technologies for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in Australia: Market access challenges and implications for patients, decision-makers, and manufacturers
PURPOSE: The success of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has expanded its use for a broader range of shoulder indications worldwide. Evidence regarding the relative efficacy and long-term safety of medical technologies used in RTSA is subjected to rigorous assessment. Nonetheless, substant...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Routledge
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9731581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2022.2154420 |
_version_ | 1784845935981887488 |
---|---|
author | Gumbie, Mutsa Costa, Michelle Erb, Michael Dissanayake, Gnanadarsha |
author_facet | Gumbie, Mutsa Costa, Michelle Erb, Michael Dissanayake, Gnanadarsha |
author_sort | Gumbie, Mutsa |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The success of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has expanded its use for a broader range of shoulder indications worldwide. Evidence regarding the relative efficacy and long-term safety of medical technologies used in RTSA is subjected to rigorous assessment. Nonetheless, substantial challenges impede market access for innovative shoulder implant technologies for RTSA in Australia, resulting in delayed patient access. APPROACH: This paper addresses the key challenges associated with generating evidence for the health technology assessments of innovative medical technologies for RTSA that are required for access to the Australian market. The transition to value-based care requires establishing a benchmarking reference that incorporates patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and combines revision outcomes with additional clinical outcomes to increase patient cohort sizes. Establishing the benchmark would require agreement on the outcome measures to be collected for each indication, and investment in reporting patient-reported outcomes for RTSA to the national orthopaedic registry. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The need for increased flexibility in developing evidence for health technology assessment of RTSA medical technologies is required. Optimised approaches for benchmarking RTSA require extensive stakeholder discussions, including the agreement on evidence requirements and follow-up periods, selection of clinical outcomes, as well as pre-operative and post-operative PROMs as a value assessment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9731581 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Routledge |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97315812022-12-09 Innovative technologies for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in Australia: Market access challenges and implications for patients, decision-makers, and manufacturers Gumbie, Mutsa Costa, Michelle Erb, Michael Dissanayake, Gnanadarsha J Mark Access Health Policy Review Article PURPOSE: The success of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has expanded its use for a broader range of shoulder indications worldwide. Evidence regarding the relative efficacy and long-term safety of medical technologies used in RTSA is subjected to rigorous assessment. Nonetheless, substantial challenges impede market access for innovative shoulder implant technologies for RTSA in Australia, resulting in delayed patient access. APPROACH: This paper addresses the key challenges associated with generating evidence for the health technology assessments of innovative medical technologies for RTSA that are required for access to the Australian market. The transition to value-based care requires establishing a benchmarking reference that incorporates patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and combines revision outcomes with additional clinical outcomes to increase patient cohort sizes. Establishing the benchmark would require agreement on the outcome measures to be collected for each indication, and investment in reporting patient-reported outcomes for RTSA to the national orthopaedic registry. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The need for increased flexibility in developing evidence for health technology assessment of RTSA medical technologies is required. Optimised approaches for benchmarking RTSA require extensive stakeholder discussions, including the agreement on evidence requirements and follow-up periods, selection of clinical outcomes, as well as pre-operative and post-operative PROMs as a value assessment. Routledge 2022-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9731581/ /pubmed/36506841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2022.2154420 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Gumbie, Mutsa Costa, Michelle Erb, Michael Dissanayake, Gnanadarsha Innovative technologies for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in Australia: Market access challenges and implications for patients, decision-makers, and manufacturers |
title | Innovative technologies for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in Australia: Market access challenges and implications for patients, decision-makers, and manufacturers |
title_full | Innovative technologies for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in Australia: Market access challenges and implications for patients, decision-makers, and manufacturers |
title_fullStr | Innovative technologies for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in Australia: Market access challenges and implications for patients, decision-makers, and manufacturers |
title_full_unstemmed | Innovative technologies for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in Australia: Market access challenges and implications for patients, decision-makers, and manufacturers |
title_short | Innovative technologies for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in Australia: Market access challenges and implications for patients, decision-makers, and manufacturers |
title_sort | innovative technologies for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in australia: market access challenges and implications for patients, decision-makers, and manufacturers |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9731581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2022.2154420 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gumbiemutsa innovativetechnologiesforreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyinaustraliamarketaccesschallengesandimplicationsforpatientsdecisionmakersandmanufacturers AT costamichelle innovativetechnologiesforreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyinaustraliamarketaccesschallengesandimplicationsforpatientsdecisionmakersandmanufacturers AT erbmichael innovativetechnologiesforreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyinaustraliamarketaccesschallengesandimplicationsforpatientsdecisionmakersandmanufacturers AT dissanayakegnanadarsha innovativetechnologiesforreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyinaustraliamarketaccesschallengesandimplicationsforpatientsdecisionmakersandmanufacturers |