Cargando…

Innovative technologies for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in Australia: Market access challenges and implications for patients, decision-makers, and manufacturers

PURPOSE: The success of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has expanded its use for a broader range of shoulder indications worldwide. Evidence regarding the relative efficacy and long-term safety of medical technologies used in RTSA is subjected to rigorous assessment. Nonetheless, substant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gumbie, Mutsa, Costa, Michelle, Erb, Michael, Dissanayake, Gnanadarsha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9731581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2022.2154420
_version_ 1784845935981887488
author Gumbie, Mutsa
Costa, Michelle
Erb, Michael
Dissanayake, Gnanadarsha
author_facet Gumbie, Mutsa
Costa, Michelle
Erb, Michael
Dissanayake, Gnanadarsha
author_sort Gumbie, Mutsa
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The success of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has expanded its use for a broader range of shoulder indications worldwide. Evidence regarding the relative efficacy and long-term safety of medical technologies used in RTSA is subjected to rigorous assessment. Nonetheless, substantial challenges impede market access for innovative shoulder implant technologies for RTSA in Australia, resulting in delayed patient access. APPROACH: This paper addresses the key challenges associated with generating evidence for the health technology assessments of innovative medical technologies for RTSA that are required for access to the Australian market. The transition to value-based care requires establishing a benchmarking reference that incorporates patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and combines revision outcomes with additional clinical outcomes to increase patient cohort sizes. Establishing the benchmark would require agreement on the outcome measures to be collected for each indication, and investment in reporting patient-reported outcomes for RTSA to the national orthopaedic registry. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The need for increased flexibility in developing evidence for health technology assessment of RTSA medical technologies is required. Optimised approaches for benchmarking RTSA require extensive stakeholder discussions, including the agreement on evidence requirements and follow-up periods, selection of clinical outcomes, as well as pre-operative and post-operative PROMs as a value assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9731581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97315812022-12-09 Innovative technologies for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in Australia: Market access challenges and implications for patients, decision-makers, and manufacturers Gumbie, Mutsa Costa, Michelle Erb, Michael Dissanayake, Gnanadarsha J Mark Access Health Policy Review Article PURPOSE: The success of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has expanded its use for a broader range of shoulder indications worldwide. Evidence regarding the relative efficacy and long-term safety of medical technologies used in RTSA is subjected to rigorous assessment. Nonetheless, substantial challenges impede market access for innovative shoulder implant technologies for RTSA in Australia, resulting in delayed patient access. APPROACH: This paper addresses the key challenges associated with generating evidence for the health technology assessments of innovative medical technologies for RTSA that are required for access to the Australian market. The transition to value-based care requires establishing a benchmarking reference that incorporates patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and combines revision outcomes with additional clinical outcomes to increase patient cohort sizes. Establishing the benchmark would require agreement on the outcome measures to be collected for each indication, and investment in reporting patient-reported outcomes for RTSA to the national orthopaedic registry. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The need for increased flexibility in developing evidence for health technology assessment of RTSA medical technologies is required. Optimised approaches for benchmarking RTSA require extensive stakeholder discussions, including the agreement on evidence requirements and follow-up periods, selection of clinical outcomes, as well as pre-operative and post-operative PROMs as a value assessment. Routledge 2022-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9731581/ /pubmed/36506841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2022.2154420 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Gumbie, Mutsa
Costa, Michelle
Erb, Michael
Dissanayake, Gnanadarsha
Innovative technologies for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in Australia: Market access challenges and implications for patients, decision-makers, and manufacturers
title Innovative technologies for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in Australia: Market access challenges and implications for patients, decision-makers, and manufacturers
title_full Innovative technologies for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in Australia: Market access challenges and implications for patients, decision-makers, and manufacturers
title_fullStr Innovative technologies for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in Australia: Market access challenges and implications for patients, decision-makers, and manufacturers
title_full_unstemmed Innovative technologies for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in Australia: Market access challenges and implications for patients, decision-makers, and manufacturers
title_short Innovative technologies for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in Australia: Market access challenges and implications for patients, decision-makers, and manufacturers
title_sort innovative technologies for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in australia: market access challenges and implications for patients, decision-makers, and manufacturers
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9731581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2022.2154420
work_keys_str_mv AT gumbiemutsa innovativetechnologiesforreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyinaustraliamarketaccesschallengesandimplicationsforpatientsdecisionmakersandmanufacturers
AT costamichelle innovativetechnologiesforreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyinaustraliamarketaccesschallengesandimplicationsforpatientsdecisionmakersandmanufacturers
AT erbmichael innovativetechnologiesforreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyinaustraliamarketaccesschallengesandimplicationsforpatientsdecisionmakersandmanufacturers
AT dissanayakegnanadarsha innovativetechnologiesforreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyinaustraliamarketaccesschallengesandimplicationsforpatientsdecisionmakersandmanufacturers