Cargando…

Intolerance of a non-diffractive extended-depth-of-focus IOL with mini-monovision

PURPOSE: The use of a non-diffractive extended-depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) with slight myopia of −0.5 D on the non-dominant eye increases the spectacle independence and has good subjective tolerance with optical phenomena comparable to those of a monofocal IOL. This case report desc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jandewerth, Tyll, Biller, Marvin, Kohnen, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9731877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36507465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2022.101770
_version_ 1784845999703851008
author Jandewerth, Tyll
Biller, Marvin
Kohnen, Thomas
author_facet Jandewerth, Tyll
Biller, Marvin
Kohnen, Thomas
author_sort Jandewerth, Tyll
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The use of a non-diffractive extended-depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) with slight myopia of −0.5 D on the non-dominant eye increases the spectacle independence and has good subjective tolerance with optical phenomena comparable to those of a monofocal IOL. This case report describes the course of a myopic patient who underwent refractive lens exchange, didn't tolerate mini-monovision and received IOL exchange therefore. OBSERVATIONS: A healthy, 62-year-old male with myopia of approximately −5 D underwent refractive lens exchange with a non-diffractive EDOF-IOL on both eyes with slight myopia on the non-dominant left eye (mini-monovision). The operation was performed without any complications, postoperative treatment was due to the clinic's standard procedure. Two weeks postoperative the patient presented with uncorrected distance visual acuity of 0.0 logMAR, a subjective refraction of −0.25/−0.25/142° and corrected distance visual acuity of 0.1 logMAR on the right eye. On the left eye, distance visual acuity was 0.4 logMAR with a subjective refraction of −0.5/−0.75/9° (intended mini-monovision) and corrected distance visual acuity of 0.0 logMAR. Binocular distance visual acuity was 0.0 logMAR. The patient complained about the occurrence of optical phenomena at dim light while driving a car and subjective reduced visual acuity. After an IOL exchange on the left eye with the implantation of the same type of non-diffractive EDOF-IOL aimed for emmetropia, the patient was symptom-free and reported no more subjective complaints. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the satisfying subjective and objective visual outcome which is proven in multiple studies, the subjective perception of a mini-monovision with a non-diffractive EDOF-IOL can vary individually. A preoperative assessment of the patient's needs and tolerance of a mini-monovision is crucial for a satisfying postoperative outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9731877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97318772022-12-10 Intolerance of a non-diffractive extended-depth-of-focus IOL with mini-monovision Jandewerth, Tyll Biller, Marvin Kohnen, Thomas Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep Case Report PURPOSE: The use of a non-diffractive extended-depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) with slight myopia of −0.5 D on the non-dominant eye increases the spectacle independence and has good subjective tolerance with optical phenomena comparable to those of a monofocal IOL. This case report describes the course of a myopic patient who underwent refractive lens exchange, didn't tolerate mini-monovision and received IOL exchange therefore. OBSERVATIONS: A healthy, 62-year-old male with myopia of approximately −5 D underwent refractive lens exchange with a non-diffractive EDOF-IOL on both eyes with slight myopia on the non-dominant left eye (mini-monovision). The operation was performed without any complications, postoperative treatment was due to the clinic's standard procedure. Two weeks postoperative the patient presented with uncorrected distance visual acuity of 0.0 logMAR, a subjective refraction of −0.25/−0.25/142° and corrected distance visual acuity of 0.1 logMAR on the right eye. On the left eye, distance visual acuity was 0.4 logMAR with a subjective refraction of −0.5/−0.75/9° (intended mini-monovision) and corrected distance visual acuity of 0.0 logMAR. Binocular distance visual acuity was 0.0 logMAR. The patient complained about the occurrence of optical phenomena at dim light while driving a car and subjective reduced visual acuity. After an IOL exchange on the left eye with the implantation of the same type of non-diffractive EDOF-IOL aimed for emmetropia, the patient was symptom-free and reported no more subjective complaints. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the satisfying subjective and objective visual outcome which is proven in multiple studies, the subjective perception of a mini-monovision with a non-diffractive EDOF-IOL can vary individually. A preoperative assessment of the patient's needs and tolerance of a mini-monovision is crucial for a satisfying postoperative outcome. Elsevier 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9731877/ /pubmed/36507465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2022.101770 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Report
Jandewerth, Tyll
Biller, Marvin
Kohnen, Thomas
Intolerance of a non-diffractive extended-depth-of-focus IOL with mini-monovision
title Intolerance of a non-diffractive extended-depth-of-focus IOL with mini-monovision
title_full Intolerance of a non-diffractive extended-depth-of-focus IOL with mini-monovision
title_fullStr Intolerance of a non-diffractive extended-depth-of-focus IOL with mini-monovision
title_full_unstemmed Intolerance of a non-diffractive extended-depth-of-focus IOL with mini-monovision
title_short Intolerance of a non-diffractive extended-depth-of-focus IOL with mini-monovision
title_sort intolerance of a non-diffractive extended-depth-of-focus iol with mini-monovision
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9731877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36507465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2022.101770
work_keys_str_mv AT jandewerthtyll intoleranceofanondiffractiveextendeddepthoffocusiolwithminimonovision
AT billermarvin intoleranceofanondiffractiveextendeddepthoffocusiolwithminimonovision
AT kohnenthomas intoleranceofanondiffractiveextendeddepthoffocusiolwithminimonovision