Cargando…

Traffic speed prediction techniques in urban environments

The present study developed Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and machine learning (ML) models, including Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest (RF), to predict the mean free-flow speed (FFS) using several geometric, traffic, and pavement condition variables...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alomari, Ahmad H., Khedaywi, Taisir S., Marian, Abdel Rahman O., Jadah, Asalah A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9732136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11847
_version_ 1784846064295084032
author Alomari, Ahmad H.
Khedaywi, Taisir S.
Marian, Abdel Rahman O.
Jadah, Asalah A.
author_facet Alomari, Ahmad H.
Khedaywi, Taisir S.
Marian, Abdel Rahman O.
Jadah, Asalah A.
author_sort Alomari, Ahmad H.
collection PubMed
description The present study developed Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and machine learning (ML) models, including Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest (RF), to predict the mean free-flow speed (FFS) using several geometric, traffic, and pavement condition variables. The traffic features group includes spot speed, speed limit, average speed, 85th percentile speed, traffic and crossing pedestrian volumes, volume of exiting vehicles, percentage of elderly crossing pedestrians (Elderly%), percentage of heavy vehicles (HV%), and traffic calming measures (TCMs). The geometric characteristics include lateral clearance, number of effective lanes, number of access points (including median openings), road grade, effective lane width, and median width. The pavement condition category includes pavement roughness in the International Roughness Index (IRI). A total of 11 urban arterials were used to develop the MLR model and train the ML models. Test data were collected from two randomly selected roads to evaluate the performance of each model, investigate the differences between conventional linear regression and ML approaches, and determine the best prediction models based on the results of the two techniques. Results showed that the proposed ML algorithms outperformed linear regression models. They are believed to be valuable and strong tools to predict the mean FFS that adapts to sudden changes in traffic flow caused by exogenous conditions on urban arterials and can be employed in determining the most influential factors and building reliable prediction models where spot study is not feasible due to time and resource limitations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9732136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97321362022-12-10 Traffic speed prediction techniques in urban environments Alomari, Ahmad H. Khedaywi, Taisir S. Marian, Abdel Rahman O. Jadah, Asalah A. Heliyon Research Article The present study developed Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and machine learning (ML) models, including Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest (RF), to predict the mean free-flow speed (FFS) using several geometric, traffic, and pavement condition variables. The traffic features group includes spot speed, speed limit, average speed, 85th percentile speed, traffic and crossing pedestrian volumes, volume of exiting vehicles, percentage of elderly crossing pedestrians (Elderly%), percentage of heavy vehicles (HV%), and traffic calming measures (TCMs). The geometric characteristics include lateral clearance, number of effective lanes, number of access points (including median openings), road grade, effective lane width, and median width. The pavement condition category includes pavement roughness in the International Roughness Index (IRI). A total of 11 urban arterials were used to develop the MLR model and train the ML models. Test data were collected from two randomly selected roads to evaluate the performance of each model, investigate the differences between conventional linear regression and ML approaches, and determine the best prediction models based on the results of the two techniques. Results showed that the proposed ML algorithms outperformed linear regression models. They are believed to be valuable and strong tools to predict the mean FFS that adapts to sudden changes in traffic flow caused by exogenous conditions on urban arterials and can be employed in determining the most influential factors and building reliable prediction models where spot study is not feasible due to time and resource limitations. Elsevier 2022-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9732136/ /pubmed/36506368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11847 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Alomari, Ahmad H.
Khedaywi, Taisir S.
Marian, Abdel Rahman O.
Jadah, Asalah A.
Traffic speed prediction techniques in urban environments
title Traffic speed prediction techniques in urban environments
title_full Traffic speed prediction techniques in urban environments
title_fullStr Traffic speed prediction techniques in urban environments
title_full_unstemmed Traffic speed prediction techniques in urban environments
title_short Traffic speed prediction techniques in urban environments
title_sort traffic speed prediction techniques in urban environments
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9732136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11847
work_keys_str_mv AT alomariahmadh trafficspeedpredictiontechniquesinurbanenvironments
AT khedaywitaisirs trafficspeedpredictiontechniquesinurbanenvironments
AT marianabdelrahmano trafficspeedpredictiontechniquesinurbanenvironments
AT jadahasalaha trafficspeedpredictiontechniquesinurbanenvironments