Cargando…
Rheological Behavior of SAE50 Oil–SnO(2)–CeO(2) Hybrid Nanofluid: Experimental Investigation and Modeling Utilizing Response Surface Method and Machine Learning Techniques
In this study, for the first time, the effects of temperature and nanopowder volume fraction (NPSVF) on the viscosity and the rheological behavior of SAE50–SnO(2)–CeO(2) hybrid nanofluid have been studied experimentally. Nanofluids in NPSVFs of 0.25% to 1.5% have been made by a two-step method. Expe...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9732181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36480098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s11671-022-03756-7 |
Sumario: | In this study, for the first time, the effects of temperature and nanopowder volume fraction (NPSVF) on the viscosity and the rheological behavior of SAE50–SnO(2)–CeO(2) hybrid nanofluid have been studied experimentally. Nanofluids in NPSVFs of 0.25% to 1.5% have been made by a two-step method. Experiments have been performed at temperatures of 25 to 67 °C and shear rates (SRs) of 1333 to 2932.6 s(−1). The results revealed that for base fluid and nanofluid, shear stress increases with increasing SR and decreasing temperature. By increasing the temperature to about 42 °C at a NPSVF of 1.5%, about 89.36% reduction in viscosity is observed. The viscosity increases with increasing NPSVF about 37.18% at 25 °C. In all states, a non-Newtonian pseudo-plastic behavior has been observed for the base fluid and nanofluid. The highest relative viscosity occurs for NPSVF = 1.5%, temperature = 25 °C and SR = 2932.6 s(−1), which increases the viscosity by 37.18% compared to the base fluid. The sensitivity analysis indicated that the highest sensitivity is related to temperature and the lowest sensitivity is related to SR. Response surface method, curve fitting method, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and Gaussian process regression (GPR) have been used to predict the dynamic viscosity. Based on the results, all four models can predict the dynamic viscosity. However, the GPR model has better performance than the other models. |
---|