Cargando…

Perioperative hemodynamic protective assessment of adaptive support ventilation usage in pediatric surgical patients

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the hemodynamic protective effects of perioperative ventilation in pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and adaptive support ventilation (ASV) modes based on non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring indicators. METHODS: The study included 32 patients who...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dmytriiev, Dmytro, Melnychenko, Mykola, Dobrovanov, Oleksandr, Nazarchuk, Oleksandr, Vidiscak, Marian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9732189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36330739
http://dx.doi.org/10.4266/acc.2022.00297
_version_ 1784846070464905216
author Dmytriiev, Dmytro
Melnychenko, Mykola
Dobrovanov, Oleksandr
Nazarchuk, Oleksandr
Vidiscak, Marian
author_facet Dmytriiev, Dmytro
Melnychenko, Mykola
Dobrovanov, Oleksandr
Nazarchuk, Oleksandr
Vidiscak, Marian
author_sort Dmytriiev, Dmytro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the hemodynamic protective effects of perioperative ventilation in pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and adaptive support ventilation (ASV) modes based on non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring indicators. METHODS: The study included 32 patients who were scheduled for planned open abdominal surgery. Depending on the chosen ventilation strategy, patients were included in two groups of PCV mode ventilation (n=14) and ASV mode ventilation (n=18). The hemodynamic effects of the ventilation strategies were assessed by estimated continuous cardiac output (esCCO) and cardiac index (esCCI). RESULTS: Preoperative cardiac output (CO) was 6.1±1.3 L/min in group 1 patients and 6.3±0.8 L/min in group 2 patients, and preoperative cardiac index (CI) was 3.9±0.4 L/min/m(2) in group 1 patients and 3.8±0.8 L/min/m(2) in group 2 patients. The ejection fraction (EF) in group 1 subjects was 55.4%±0.3%; this rate was 56.5%±0.5% in group 2 subjects. Group 1 patients experienced a 14.7% CO decrease to 5.2±0.7 L/min, a 17.9% CI decrease to 3.2±0.6 L/min/m(2), and a 12.8% mean arterial pressure decrease to 82.3±9.4 mm Hg 30 minutes after the start of surgery. One hour after the start of surgery, the CO mean values of group 2 patients were lower than baseline by 7.9% and differed from the dynamics of patients in group 1, in whom CO was lower than baseline by 13.1%. At the end of the operation, the CO values were lower than baseline by 11.5% and 6.3% in patients of groups 1 and 2, respectively. Our data showed that the changes in EF during and after surgery correlated with CO indicators determined by the esCCO. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, perioperative ventilation in ASV mode was more protective than PCV mode and was characterized by lower tidal volume (16.2%) and driving pressure (12.1%). Hemodynamically-controlled mechanical ventilation reduces the negative impact of cardiopulmonary interactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9732189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97321892022-12-19 Perioperative hemodynamic protective assessment of adaptive support ventilation usage in pediatric surgical patients Dmytriiev, Dmytro Melnychenko, Mykola Dobrovanov, Oleksandr Nazarchuk, Oleksandr Vidiscak, Marian Acute Crit Care Original Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the hemodynamic protective effects of perioperative ventilation in pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and adaptive support ventilation (ASV) modes based on non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring indicators. METHODS: The study included 32 patients who were scheduled for planned open abdominal surgery. Depending on the chosen ventilation strategy, patients were included in two groups of PCV mode ventilation (n=14) and ASV mode ventilation (n=18). The hemodynamic effects of the ventilation strategies were assessed by estimated continuous cardiac output (esCCO) and cardiac index (esCCI). RESULTS: Preoperative cardiac output (CO) was 6.1±1.3 L/min in group 1 patients and 6.3±0.8 L/min in group 2 patients, and preoperative cardiac index (CI) was 3.9±0.4 L/min/m(2) in group 1 patients and 3.8±0.8 L/min/m(2) in group 2 patients. The ejection fraction (EF) in group 1 subjects was 55.4%±0.3%; this rate was 56.5%±0.5% in group 2 subjects. Group 1 patients experienced a 14.7% CO decrease to 5.2±0.7 L/min, a 17.9% CI decrease to 3.2±0.6 L/min/m(2), and a 12.8% mean arterial pressure decrease to 82.3±9.4 mm Hg 30 minutes after the start of surgery. One hour after the start of surgery, the CO mean values of group 2 patients were lower than baseline by 7.9% and differed from the dynamics of patients in group 1, in whom CO was lower than baseline by 13.1%. At the end of the operation, the CO values were lower than baseline by 11.5% and 6.3% in patients of groups 1 and 2, respectively. Our data showed that the changes in EF during and after surgery correlated with CO indicators determined by the esCCO. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, perioperative ventilation in ASV mode was more protective than PCV mode and was characterized by lower tidal volume (16.2%) and driving pressure (12.1%). Hemodynamically-controlled mechanical ventilation reduces the negative impact of cardiopulmonary interactions. Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine 2022-11 2022-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9732189/ /pubmed/36330739 http://dx.doi.org/10.4266/acc.2022.00297 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Dmytriiev, Dmytro
Melnychenko, Mykola
Dobrovanov, Oleksandr
Nazarchuk, Oleksandr
Vidiscak, Marian
Perioperative hemodynamic protective assessment of adaptive support ventilation usage in pediatric surgical patients
title Perioperative hemodynamic protective assessment of adaptive support ventilation usage in pediatric surgical patients
title_full Perioperative hemodynamic protective assessment of adaptive support ventilation usage in pediatric surgical patients
title_fullStr Perioperative hemodynamic protective assessment of adaptive support ventilation usage in pediatric surgical patients
title_full_unstemmed Perioperative hemodynamic protective assessment of adaptive support ventilation usage in pediatric surgical patients
title_short Perioperative hemodynamic protective assessment of adaptive support ventilation usage in pediatric surgical patients
title_sort perioperative hemodynamic protective assessment of adaptive support ventilation usage in pediatric surgical patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9732189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36330739
http://dx.doi.org/10.4266/acc.2022.00297
work_keys_str_mv AT dmytriievdmytro perioperativehemodynamicprotectiveassessmentofadaptivesupportventilationusageinpediatricsurgicalpatients
AT melnychenkomykola perioperativehemodynamicprotectiveassessmentofadaptivesupportventilationusageinpediatricsurgicalpatients
AT dobrovanovoleksandr perioperativehemodynamicprotectiveassessmentofadaptivesupportventilationusageinpediatricsurgicalpatients
AT nazarchukoleksandr perioperativehemodynamicprotectiveassessmentofadaptivesupportventilationusageinpediatricsurgicalpatients
AT vidiscakmarian perioperativehemodynamicprotectiveassessmentofadaptivesupportventilationusageinpediatricsurgicalpatients