Cargando…

A nomogram for evaluation and analysis of difficulty in retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A single-center study with prospective validation using LASSO-logistic regression

BACKGROUND: While it is known that inaccurate evaluation for retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RPLA) can affect the surgical results of patients, no stable and effective prediction model for the procedure exists. In this study, we aimed to develop a computed tomography (CT) -based radiolog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Shiwei, Wang, Jinyao, Yang, Bin, Wang, Yue, Yao, Wei, Yue, Peng, Niu, Xiangnan, Feng, Anhao, Zhang, Lele, Yan, Liang, Cheng, Wei, Zhang, Yangang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9732249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506074
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1004112
_version_ 1784846085399773184
author Sun, Shiwei
Wang, Jinyao
Yang, Bin
Wang, Yue
Yao, Wei
Yue, Peng
Niu, Xiangnan
Feng, Anhao
Zhang, Lele
Yan, Liang
Cheng, Wei
Zhang, Yangang
author_facet Sun, Shiwei
Wang, Jinyao
Yang, Bin
Wang, Yue
Yao, Wei
Yue, Peng
Niu, Xiangnan
Feng, Anhao
Zhang, Lele
Yan, Liang
Cheng, Wei
Zhang, Yangang
author_sort Sun, Shiwei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While it is known that inaccurate evaluation for retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RPLA) can affect the surgical results of patients, no stable and effective prediction model for the procedure exists. In this study, we aimed to develop a computed tomography (CT) -based radiological-clinical prediction model for evaluating the surgical difficulty of RPLA. METHOD: Data from 398 patients with adrenal tumors treated by RPLA in a single center from August 2014 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into sets. The influencing factors were selected by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model (LASSO). Additionally, the nomogram was constructed. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to analyze the prediction efficiency of the nomogram. The C-index and bootstrap self-sampling methods were used to verify the discrimination and consistency of the nomogram. RESULT: The following 11 independent influencing factors were selected by LASSO: body mass index, diabetes mellitus, scoliosis, hyperlipidemia, history of operation, tumor diameter, distance from adrenal tumor to upper pole of kidney, retro renal fat area, hyperaldosteronism, pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma, and myelolipoma. The area under the curve (AUC) of the training set was 0.787, and 0.844 in the internal validation set. Decision curve analyses indicated the model to be useful. An additional 117 patients were recruited for prospective validation, and AUC was 0.848. CONCLUSION: This study developed a radiological-clinical prediction model proposed for predicting the difficulty of RPLA procedures. This model was suitable, accessible, and helpful for individualized surgical preparation and reduced operational risk. Thus, this model could contribute to more patients’ benefit in circumventing surgical difficulties because of accurate predictive abilities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9732249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97322492022-12-10 A nomogram for evaluation and analysis of difficulty in retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A single-center study with prospective validation using LASSO-logistic regression Sun, Shiwei Wang, Jinyao Yang, Bin Wang, Yue Yao, Wei Yue, Peng Niu, Xiangnan Feng, Anhao Zhang, Lele Yan, Liang Cheng, Wei Zhang, Yangang Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology BACKGROUND: While it is known that inaccurate evaluation for retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RPLA) can affect the surgical results of patients, no stable and effective prediction model for the procedure exists. In this study, we aimed to develop a computed tomography (CT) -based radiological-clinical prediction model for evaluating the surgical difficulty of RPLA. METHOD: Data from 398 patients with adrenal tumors treated by RPLA in a single center from August 2014 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into sets. The influencing factors were selected by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model (LASSO). Additionally, the nomogram was constructed. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to analyze the prediction efficiency of the nomogram. The C-index and bootstrap self-sampling methods were used to verify the discrimination and consistency of the nomogram. RESULT: The following 11 independent influencing factors were selected by LASSO: body mass index, diabetes mellitus, scoliosis, hyperlipidemia, history of operation, tumor diameter, distance from adrenal tumor to upper pole of kidney, retro renal fat area, hyperaldosteronism, pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma, and myelolipoma. The area under the curve (AUC) of the training set was 0.787, and 0.844 in the internal validation set. Decision curve analyses indicated the model to be useful. An additional 117 patients were recruited for prospective validation, and AUC was 0.848. CONCLUSION: This study developed a radiological-clinical prediction model proposed for predicting the difficulty of RPLA procedures. This model was suitable, accessible, and helpful for individualized surgical preparation and reduced operational risk. Thus, this model could contribute to more patients’ benefit in circumventing surgical difficulties because of accurate predictive abilities. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9732249/ /pubmed/36506074 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1004112 Text en Copyright © 2022 Sun, Wang, Yang, Wang, Yao, Yue, Niu, Feng, Zhang, Yan, Cheng and Zhang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Sun, Shiwei
Wang, Jinyao
Yang, Bin
Wang, Yue
Yao, Wei
Yue, Peng
Niu, Xiangnan
Feng, Anhao
Zhang, Lele
Yan, Liang
Cheng, Wei
Zhang, Yangang
A nomogram for evaluation and analysis of difficulty in retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A single-center study with prospective validation using LASSO-logistic regression
title A nomogram for evaluation and analysis of difficulty in retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A single-center study with prospective validation using LASSO-logistic regression
title_full A nomogram for evaluation and analysis of difficulty in retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A single-center study with prospective validation using LASSO-logistic regression
title_fullStr A nomogram for evaluation and analysis of difficulty in retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A single-center study with prospective validation using LASSO-logistic regression
title_full_unstemmed A nomogram for evaluation and analysis of difficulty in retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A single-center study with prospective validation using LASSO-logistic regression
title_short A nomogram for evaluation and analysis of difficulty in retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A single-center study with prospective validation using LASSO-logistic regression
title_sort nomogram for evaluation and analysis of difficulty in retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a single-center study with prospective validation using lasso-logistic regression
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9732249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506074
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1004112
work_keys_str_mv AT sunshiwei anomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression
AT wangjinyao anomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression
AT yangbin anomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression
AT wangyue anomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression
AT yaowei anomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression
AT yuepeng anomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression
AT niuxiangnan anomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression
AT fenganhao anomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression
AT zhanglele anomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression
AT yanliang anomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression
AT chengwei anomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression
AT zhangyangang anomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression
AT sunshiwei nomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression
AT wangjinyao nomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression
AT yangbin nomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression
AT wangyue nomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression
AT yaowei nomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression
AT yuepeng nomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression
AT niuxiangnan nomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression
AT fenganhao nomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression
AT zhanglele nomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression
AT yanliang nomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression
AT chengwei nomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression
AT zhangyangang nomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression