Cargando…
A nomogram for evaluation and analysis of difficulty in retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A single-center study with prospective validation using LASSO-logistic regression
BACKGROUND: While it is known that inaccurate evaluation for retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RPLA) can affect the surgical results of patients, no stable and effective prediction model for the procedure exists. In this study, we aimed to develop a computed tomography (CT) -based radiolog...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9732249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506074 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1004112 |
_version_ | 1784846085399773184 |
---|---|
author | Sun, Shiwei Wang, Jinyao Yang, Bin Wang, Yue Yao, Wei Yue, Peng Niu, Xiangnan Feng, Anhao Zhang, Lele Yan, Liang Cheng, Wei Zhang, Yangang |
author_facet | Sun, Shiwei Wang, Jinyao Yang, Bin Wang, Yue Yao, Wei Yue, Peng Niu, Xiangnan Feng, Anhao Zhang, Lele Yan, Liang Cheng, Wei Zhang, Yangang |
author_sort | Sun, Shiwei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: While it is known that inaccurate evaluation for retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RPLA) can affect the surgical results of patients, no stable and effective prediction model for the procedure exists. In this study, we aimed to develop a computed tomography (CT) -based radiological-clinical prediction model for evaluating the surgical difficulty of RPLA. METHOD: Data from 398 patients with adrenal tumors treated by RPLA in a single center from August 2014 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into sets. The influencing factors were selected by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model (LASSO). Additionally, the nomogram was constructed. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to analyze the prediction efficiency of the nomogram. The C-index and bootstrap self-sampling methods were used to verify the discrimination and consistency of the nomogram. RESULT: The following 11 independent influencing factors were selected by LASSO: body mass index, diabetes mellitus, scoliosis, hyperlipidemia, history of operation, tumor diameter, distance from adrenal tumor to upper pole of kidney, retro renal fat area, hyperaldosteronism, pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma, and myelolipoma. The area under the curve (AUC) of the training set was 0.787, and 0.844 in the internal validation set. Decision curve analyses indicated the model to be useful. An additional 117 patients were recruited for prospective validation, and AUC was 0.848. CONCLUSION: This study developed a radiological-clinical prediction model proposed for predicting the difficulty of RPLA procedures. This model was suitable, accessible, and helpful for individualized surgical preparation and reduced operational risk. Thus, this model could contribute to more patients’ benefit in circumventing surgical difficulties because of accurate predictive abilities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9732249 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97322492022-12-10 A nomogram for evaluation and analysis of difficulty in retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A single-center study with prospective validation using LASSO-logistic regression Sun, Shiwei Wang, Jinyao Yang, Bin Wang, Yue Yao, Wei Yue, Peng Niu, Xiangnan Feng, Anhao Zhang, Lele Yan, Liang Cheng, Wei Zhang, Yangang Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology BACKGROUND: While it is known that inaccurate evaluation for retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RPLA) can affect the surgical results of patients, no stable and effective prediction model for the procedure exists. In this study, we aimed to develop a computed tomography (CT) -based radiological-clinical prediction model for evaluating the surgical difficulty of RPLA. METHOD: Data from 398 patients with adrenal tumors treated by RPLA in a single center from August 2014 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into sets. The influencing factors were selected by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model (LASSO). Additionally, the nomogram was constructed. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to analyze the prediction efficiency of the nomogram. The C-index and bootstrap self-sampling methods were used to verify the discrimination and consistency of the nomogram. RESULT: The following 11 independent influencing factors were selected by LASSO: body mass index, diabetes mellitus, scoliosis, hyperlipidemia, history of operation, tumor diameter, distance from adrenal tumor to upper pole of kidney, retro renal fat area, hyperaldosteronism, pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma, and myelolipoma. The area under the curve (AUC) of the training set was 0.787, and 0.844 in the internal validation set. Decision curve analyses indicated the model to be useful. An additional 117 patients were recruited for prospective validation, and AUC was 0.848. CONCLUSION: This study developed a radiological-clinical prediction model proposed for predicting the difficulty of RPLA procedures. This model was suitable, accessible, and helpful for individualized surgical preparation and reduced operational risk. Thus, this model could contribute to more patients’ benefit in circumventing surgical difficulties because of accurate predictive abilities. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9732249/ /pubmed/36506074 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1004112 Text en Copyright © 2022 Sun, Wang, Yang, Wang, Yao, Yue, Niu, Feng, Zhang, Yan, Cheng and Zhang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Endocrinology Sun, Shiwei Wang, Jinyao Yang, Bin Wang, Yue Yao, Wei Yue, Peng Niu, Xiangnan Feng, Anhao Zhang, Lele Yan, Liang Cheng, Wei Zhang, Yangang A nomogram for evaluation and analysis of difficulty in retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A single-center study with prospective validation using LASSO-logistic regression |
title | A nomogram for evaluation and analysis of difficulty in retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A single-center study with prospective validation using LASSO-logistic regression |
title_full | A nomogram for evaluation and analysis of difficulty in retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A single-center study with prospective validation using LASSO-logistic regression |
title_fullStr | A nomogram for evaluation and analysis of difficulty in retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A single-center study with prospective validation using LASSO-logistic regression |
title_full_unstemmed | A nomogram for evaluation and analysis of difficulty in retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A single-center study with prospective validation using LASSO-logistic regression |
title_short | A nomogram for evaluation and analysis of difficulty in retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A single-center study with prospective validation using LASSO-logistic regression |
title_sort | nomogram for evaluation and analysis of difficulty in retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a single-center study with prospective validation using lasso-logistic regression |
topic | Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9732249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506074 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1004112 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunshiwei anomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression AT wangjinyao anomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression AT yangbin anomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression AT wangyue anomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression AT yaowei anomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression AT yuepeng anomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression AT niuxiangnan anomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression AT fenganhao anomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression AT zhanglele anomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression AT yanliang anomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression AT chengwei anomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression AT zhangyangang anomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression AT sunshiwei nomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression AT wangjinyao nomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression AT yangbin nomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression AT wangyue nomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression AT yaowei nomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression AT yuepeng nomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression AT niuxiangnan nomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression AT fenganhao nomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression AT zhanglele nomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression AT yanliang nomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression AT chengwei nomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression AT zhangyangang nomogramforevaluationandanalysisofdifficultyinretroperitoneallaparoscopicadrenalectomyasinglecenterstudywithprospectivevalidationusinglassologisticregression |