Cargando…

Prediction of manifest refraction using machine learning ensemble models on wavefront aberrometry data

PURPOSE: To assess the performance of machine learning (ML) ensemble models for predicting patient subjective refraction (SR) using demographic factors, wavefront aberrometry data, and measurement quality related metrics taken with a low-cost portable autorefractor. METHODS: Four ensemble models wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hernández, Carlos S., Gil, Andrea, Casares, Ignacio, Poderoso, Jesús, Wehse, Alec, Dave, Shivang R., Lim, Daryl, Sánchez-Montañés, Manuel, Lage, Eduardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9732475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35431181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2022.03.001
_version_ 1784846143786582016
author Hernández, Carlos S.
Gil, Andrea
Casares, Ignacio
Poderoso, Jesús
Wehse, Alec
Dave, Shivang R.
Lim, Daryl
Sánchez-Montañés, Manuel
Lage, Eduardo
author_facet Hernández, Carlos S.
Gil, Andrea
Casares, Ignacio
Poderoso, Jesús
Wehse, Alec
Dave, Shivang R.
Lim, Daryl
Sánchez-Montañés, Manuel
Lage, Eduardo
author_sort Hernández, Carlos S.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the performance of machine learning (ML) ensemble models for predicting patient subjective refraction (SR) using demographic factors, wavefront aberrometry data, and measurement quality related metrics taken with a low-cost portable autorefractor. METHODS: Four ensemble models were evaluated for predicting individual power vectors ([Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text]) corresponding to the eyeglass prescription of each patient. Those models were random forest regressor (RF), gradient boosting regressor (GB), extreme gradient boosting regressor (XGB), and a custom assembly model (ASB) that averages the first three models. Algorithms were trained on a dataset of 1244 samples and the predictive power was evaluated with 518 unseen samples. Variables used for the prediction were age, gender, Zernike coefficients up to 5th order, and pupil related metrics provided by the autorefractor. Agreement with SR was measured using Bland-Altman analysis, overall prediction error, and percentage of agreement between the ML predictions and subjective refractions for different thresholds (0.25 D, 0.5 D). RESULTS: All models considerably outperformed the predictions from the autorefractor, while ASB obtained the best results. The accuracy of the predictions for each individual power vector component was substantially improved resulting in a ± 0.63 D, ±0.14D, and ±0.08 D reduction in the 95% limits of agreement of the error distribution for [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , respectively. The wavefront-aberrometry related variables had the biggest impact on the prediction, while demographic and measurement quality-related features showed a heterogeneous but consistent predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that ML is effective for improving precision in predicting patient's SR from objective measurements taken with a low-cost portable device.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9732475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97324752022-12-10 Prediction of manifest refraction using machine learning ensemble models on wavefront aberrometry data Hernández, Carlos S. Gil, Andrea Casares, Ignacio Poderoso, Jesús Wehse, Alec Dave, Shivang R. Lim, Daryl Sánchez-Montañés, Manuel Lage, Eduardo J Optom Artificial Intelligence PURPOSE: To assess the performance of machine learning (ML) ensemble models for predicting patient subjective refraction (SR) using demographic factors, wavefront aberrometry data, and measurement quality related metrics taken with a low-cost portable autorefractor. METHODS: Four ensemble models were evaluated for predicting individual power vectors ([Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text]) corresponding to the eyeglass prescription of each patient. Those models were random forest regressor (RF), gradient boosting regressor (GB), extreme gradient boosting regressor (XGB), and a custom assembly model (ASB) that averages the first three models. Algorithms were trained on a dataset of 1244 samples and the predictive power was evaluated with 518 unseen samples. Variables used for the prediction were age, gender, Zernike coefficients up to 5th order, and pupil related metrics provided by the autorefractor. Agreement with SR was measured using Bland-Altman analysis, overall prediction error, and percentage of agreement between the ML predictions and subjective refractions for different thresholds (0.25 D, 0.5 D). RESULTS: All models considerably outperformed the predictions from the autorefractor, while ASB obtained the best results. The accuracy of the predictions for each individual power vector component was substantially improved resulting in a ± 0.63 D, ±0.14D, and ±0.08 D reduction in the 95% limits of agreement of the error distribution for [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] , respectively. The wavefront-aberrometry related variables had the biggest impact on the prediction, while demographic and measurement quality-related features showed a heterogeneous but consistent predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that ML is effective for improving precision in predicting patient's SR from objective measurements taken with a low-cost portable device. Elsevier 2022 2022-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9732475/ /pubmed/35431181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2022.03.001 Text en © 2022 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Artificial Intelligence
Hernández, Carlos S.
Gil, Andrea
Casares, Ignacio
Poderoso, Jesús
Wehse, Alec
Dave, Shivang R.
Lim, Daryl
Sánchez-Montañés, Manuel
Lage, Eduardo
Prediction of manifest refraction using machine learning ensemble models on wavefront aberrometry data
title Prediction of manifest refraction using machine learning ensemble models on wavefront aberrometry data
title_full Prediction of manifest refraction using machine learning ensemble models on wavefront aberrometry data
title_fullStr Prediction of manifest refraction using machine learning ensemble models on wavefront aberrometry data
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of manifest refraction using machine learning ensemble models on wavefront aberrometry data
title_short Prediction of manifest refraction using machine learning ensemble models on wavefront aberrometry data
title_sort prediction of manifest refraction using machine learning ensemble models on wavefront aberrometry data
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9732475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35431181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2022.03.001
work_keys_str_mv AT hernandezcarloss predictionofmanifestrefractionusingmachinelearningensemblemodelsonwavefrontaberrometrydata
AT gilandrea predictionofmanifestrefractionusingmachinelearningensemblemodelsonwavefrontaberrometrydata
AT casaresignacio predictionofmanifestrefractionusingmachinelearningensemblemodelsonwavefrontaberrometrydata
AT poderosojesus predictionofmanifestrefractionusingmachinelearningensemblemodelsonwavefrontaberrometrydata
AT wehsealec predictionofmanifestrefractionusingmachinelearningensemblemodelsonwavefrontaberrometrydata
AT daveshivangr predictionofmanifestrefractionusingmachinelearningensemblemodelsonwavefrontaberrometrydata
AT limdaryl predictionofmanifestrefractionusingmachinelearningensemblemodelsonwavefrontaberrometrydata
AT sanchezmontanesmanuel predictionofmanifestrefractionusingmachinelearningensemblemodelsonwavefrontaberrometrydata
AT lageeduardo predictionofmanifestrefractionusingmachinelearningensemblemodelsonwavefrontaberrometrydata