Cargando…
Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in women: techniques, outcomes, and challenges—a narrative review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Standard radical cystectomy (RC) in women includes the removal of the bladder, urethra, uterus with the adnexa, and the anterior vaginal wall, thereby severely affecting the urinary, sexual, and reproductive system. To limit these detrimental effects, organ-sparing, includi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9732696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36507477 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-22-463 |
_version_ | 1784846196189167616 |
---|---|
author | von Deimling, Markus Laukhtina, Ekaterina Pradere, Benjamin Pallauf, Maximilian Klemm, Jakob Fisch, Margit Shariat, Shahrokh F. Rink, Michael |
author_facet | von Deimling, Markus Laukhtina, Ekaterina Pradere, Benjamin Pallauf, Maximilian Klemm, Jakob Fisch, Margit Shariat, Shahrokh F. Rink, Michael |
author_sort | von Deimling, Markus |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Standard radical cystectomy (RC) in women includes the removal of the bladder, urethra, uterus with the adnexa, and the anterior vaginal wall, thereby severely affecting the urinary, sexual, and reproductive system. To limit these detrimental effects, organ-sparing, including nerve-sparing approaches, have been developed. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and functional outcomes are, indeed, becoming increasingly central to the shared decision-making with the patient. The objectives of this narrative review are: (I) to review the current status of RC in women, including the use of different urinary diversions (UDs); (II) to discuss organ-sparing approaches and their impact on oncological and functional outcomes in women; (III) to discuss the impact of RC on HRQOL and sexual function in women. METHODS: We performed a non-systematic literature review of the available publications in the PubMed database. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Over the past years, gender differences in oncological and functional outcomes after RC have received increased attention. According to the currently available literature, organ-sparing approaches can be safely performed in well-selected women without negatively impacting oncological outcomes. The orthotopic neobladder is feasible and oncologically safe in well-selected and informed women. The choice of the UD should be based on comprehensive counseling and the patient’s comorbidities and preferences. There still is a lack of data on sexual recovery after the different surgical approaches aimed to mitigate sexual dysfunction in women undergoing RC. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-and post-operative counseling and support of females undergoing RC regarding their expectations and experiences in terms of quality of life and functional and sexual outcomes are currently insufficient. Well-designed studies in this field are necessary to further improve outcomes of women treated with RC with an overarching aim to close the gender gap in managing women with bladder cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9732696 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97326962022-12-10 Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in women: techniques, outcomes, and challenges—a narrative review von Deimling, Markus Laukhtina, Ekaterina Pradere, Benjamin Pallauf, Maximilian Klemm, Jakob Fisch, Margit Shariat, Shahrokh F. Rink, Michael Transl Androl Urol Review Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Standard radical cystectomy (RC) in women includes the removal of the bladder, urethra, uterus with the adnexa, and the anterior vaginal wall, thereby severely affecting the urinary, sexual, and reproductive system. To limit these detrimental effects, organ-sparing, including nerve-sparing approaches, have been developed. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and functional outcomes are, indeed, becoming increasingly central to the shared decision-making with the patient. The objectives of this narrative review are: (I) to review the current status of RC in women, including the use of different urinary diversions (UDs); (II) to discuss organ-sparing approaches and their impact on oncological and functional outcomes in women; (III) to discuss the impact of RC on HRQOL and sexual function in women. METHODS: We performed a non-systematic literature review of the available publications in the PubMed database. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Over the past years, gender differences in oncological and functional outcomes after RC have received increased attention. According to the currently available literature, organ-sparing approaches can be safely performed in well-selected women without negatively impacting oncological outcomes. The orthotopic neobladder is feasible and oncologically safe in well-selected and informed women. The choice of the UD should be based on comprehensive counseling and the patient’s comorbidities and preferences. There still is a lack of data on sexual recovery after the different surgical approaches aimed to mitigate sexual dysfunction in women undergoing RC. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-and post-operative counseling and support of females undergoing RC regarding their expectations and experiences in terms of quality of life and functional and sexual outcomes are currently insufficient. Well-designed studies in this field are necessary to further improve outcomes of women treated with RC with an overarching aim to close the gender gap in managing women with bladder cancer. AME Publishing Company 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9732696/ /pubmed/36507477 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-22-463 Text en 2022 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article von Deimling, Markus Laukhtina, Ekaterina Pradere, Benjamin Pallauf, Maximilian Klemm, Jakob Fisch, Margit Shariat, Shahrokh F. Rink, Michael Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in women: techniques, outcomes, and challenges—a narrative review |
title | Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in women: techniques, outcomes, and challenges—a narrative review |
title_full | Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in women: techniques, outcomes, and challenges—a narrative review |
title_fullStr | Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in women: techniques, outcomes, and challenges—a narrative review |
title_full_unstemmed | Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in women: techniques, outcomes, and challenges—a narrative review |
title_short | Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in women: techniques, outcomes, and challenges—a narrative review |
title_sort | radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in women: techniques, outcomes, and challenges—a narrative review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9732696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36507477 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-22-463 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vondeimlingmarkus radicalcystectomyandurinarydiversioninwomentechniquesoutcomesandchallengesanarrativereview AT laukhtinaekaterina radicalcystectomyandurinarydiversioninwomentechniquesoutcomesandchallengesanarrativereview AT praderebenjamin radicalcystectomyandurinarydiversioninwomentechniquesoutcomesandchallengesanarrativereview AT pallaufmaximilian radicalcystectomyandurinarydiversioninwomentechniquesoutcomesandchallengesanarrativereview AT klemmjakob radicalcystectomyandurinarydiversioninwomentechniquesoutcomesandchallengesanarrativereview AT fischmargit radicalcystectomyandurinarydiversioninwomentechniquesoutcomesandchallengesanarrativereview AT shariatshahrokhf radicalcystectomyandurinarydiversioninwomentechniquesoutcomesandchallengesanarrativereview AT rinkmichael radicalcystectomyandurinarydiversioninwomentechniquesoutcomesandchallengesanarrativereview |