Cargando…

Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in women: techniques, outcomes, and challenges—a narrative review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Standard radical cystectomy (RC) in women includes the removal of the bladder, urethra, uterus with the adnexa, and the anterior vaginal wall, thereby severely affecting the urinary, sexual, and reproductive system. To limit these detrimental effects, organ-sparing, includi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: von Deimling, Markus, Laukhtina, Ekaterina, Pradere, Benjamin, Pallauf, Maximilian, Klemm, Jakob, Fisch, Margit, Shariat, Shahrokh F., Rink, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9732696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36507477
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-22-463
_version_ 1784846196189167616
author von Deimling, Markus
Laukhtina, Ekaterina
Pradere, Benjamin
Pallauf, Maximilian
Klemm, Jakob
Fisch, Margit
Shariat, Shahrokh F.
Rink, Michael
author_facet von Deimling, Markus
Laukhtina, Ekaterina
Pradere, Benjamin
Pallauf, Maximilian
Klemm, Jakob
Fisch, Margit
Shariat, Shahrokh F.
Rink, Michael
author_sort von Deimling, Markus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Standard radical cystectomy (RC) in women includes the removal of the bladder, urethra, uterus with the adnexa, and the anterior vaginal wall, thereby severely affecting the urinary, sexual, and reproductive system. To limit these detrimental effects, organ-sparing, including nerve-sparing approaches, have been developed. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and functional outcomes are, indeed, becoming increasingly central to the shared decision-making with the patient. The objectives of this narrative review are: (I) to review the current status of RC in women, including the use of different urinary diversions (UDs); (II) to discuss organ-sparing approaches and their impact on oncological and functional outcomes in women; (III) to discuss the impact of RC on HRQOL and sexual function in women. METHODS: We performed a non-systematic literature review of the available publications in the PubMed database. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Over the past years, gender differences in oncological and functional outcomes after RC have received increased attention. According to the currently available literature, organ-sparing approaches can be safely performed in well-selected women without negatively impacting oncological outcomes. The orthotopic neobladder is feasible and oncologically safe in well-selected and informed women. The choice of the UD should be based on comprehensive counseling and the patient’s comorbidities and preferences. There still is a lack of data on sexual recovery after the different surgical approaches aimed to mitigate sexual dysfunction in women undergoing RC. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-and post-operative counseling and support of females undergoing RC regarding their expectations and experiences in terms of quality of life and functional and sexual outcomes are currently insufficient. Well-designed studies in this field are necessary to further improve outcomes of women treated with RC with an overarching aim to close the gender gap in managing women with bladder cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9732696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97326962022-12-10 Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in women: techniques, outcomes, and challenges—a narrative review von Deimling, Markus Laukhtina, Ekaterina Pradere, Benjamin Pallauf, Maximilian Klemm, Jakob Fisch, Margit Shariat, Shahrokh F. Rink, Michael Transl Androl Urol Review Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Standard radical cystectomy (RC) in women includes the removal of the bladder, urethra, uterus with the adnexa, and the anterior vaginal wall, thereby severely affecting the urinary, sexual, and reproductive system. To limit these detrimental effects, organ-sparing, including nerve-sparing approaches, have been developed. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and functional outcomes are, indeed, becoming increasingly central to the shared decision-making with the patient. The objectives of this narrative review are: (I) to review the current status of RC in women, including the use of different urinary diversions (UDs); (II) to discuss organ-sparing approaches and their impact on oncological and functional outcomes in women; (III) to discuss the impact of RC on HRQOL and sexual function in women. METHODS: We performed a non-systematic literature review of the available publications in the PubMed database. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Over the past years, gender differences in oncological and functional outcomes after RC have received increased attention. According to the currently available literature, organ-sparing approaches can be safely performed in well-selected women without negatively impacting oncological outcomes. The orthotopic neobladder is feasible and oncologically safe in well-selected and informed women. The choice of the UD should be based on comprehensive counseling and the patient’s comorbidities and preferences. There still is a lack of data on sexual recovery after the different surgical approaches aimed to mitigate sexual dysfunction in women undergoing RC. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-and post-operative counseling and support of females undergoing RC regarding their expectations and experiences in terms of quality of life and functional and sexual outcomes are currently insufficient. Well-designed studies in this field are necessary to further improve outcomes of women treated with RC with an overarching aim to close the gender gap in managing women with bladder cancer. AME Publishing Company 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9732696/ /pubmed/36507477 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-22-463 Text en 2022 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
von Deimling, Markus
Laukhtina, Ekaterina
Pradere, Benjamin
Pallauf, Maximilian
Klemm, Jakob
Fisch, Margit
Shariat, Shahrokh F.
Rink, Michael
Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in women: techniques, outcomes, and challenges—a narrative review
title Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in women: techniques, outcomes, and challenges—a narrative review
title_full Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in women: techniques, outcomes, and challenges—a narrative review
title_fullStr Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in women: techniques, outcomes, and challenges—a narrative review
title_full_unstemmed Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in women: techniques, outcomes, and challenges—a narrative review
title_short Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in women: techniques, outcomes, and challenges—a narrative review
title_sort radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in women: techniques, outcomes, and challenges—a narrative review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9732696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36507477
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-22-463
work_keys_str_mv AT vondeimlingmarkus radicalcystectomyandurinarydiversioninwomentechniquesoutcomesandchallengesanarrativereview
AT laukhtinaekaterina radicalcystectomyandurinarydiversioninwomentechniquesoutcomesandchallengesanarrativereview
AT praderebenjamin radicalcystectomyandurinarydiversioninwomentechniquesoutcomesandchallengesanarrativereview
AT pallaufmaximilian radicalcystectomyandurinarydiversioninwomentechniquesoutcomesandchallengesanarrativereview
AT klemmjakob radicalcystectomyandurinarydiversioninwomentechniquesoutcomesandchallengesanarrativereview
AT fischmargit radicalcystectomyandurinarydiversioninwomentechniquesoutcomesandchallengesanarrativereview
AT shariatshahrokhf radicalcystectomyandurinarydiversioninwomentechniquesoutcomesandchallengesanarrativereview
AT rinkmichael radicalcystectomyandurinarydiversioninwomentechniquesoutcomesandchallengesanarrativereview