Cargando…

The first session is the one that counts: An exploratory study of therapeutic alliance

BACKGROUND: The controversy about whether psychotherapy outcome is the consequence of the techniques themselves, common factors or both is still current. The importance of common factors has been demonstrated, although it is also known that they alone are insufficient. At the present time, the conte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: del Río Olvera, Francisco Javier, Rodríguez-Mora, Álvaro, Senín-Calderón, Cristina, Rodríguez-Testal, Juan F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9732893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36507019
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1016963
_version_ 1784846233729236992
author del Río Olvera, Francisco Javier
Rodríguez-Mora, Álvaro
Senín-Calderón, Cristina
Rodríguez-Testal, Juan F.
author_facet del Río Olvera, Francisco Javier
Rodríguez-Mora, Álvaro
Senín-Calderón, Cristina
Rodríguez-Testal, Juan F.
author_sort del Río Olvera, Francisco Javier
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The controversy about whether psychotherapy outcome is the consequence of the techniques themselves, common factors or both is still current. The importance of common factors has been demonstrated, although it is also known that they alone are insufficient. At the present time, the contextual model grants heavy weight to the therapeutic alliance in the first sessions and seems to predict positive final results. Furthermore, monitoring sessions has demonstrated that this alliance improves. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the relationship between the therapeutic alliance and patient’s perceived improvement during the first five sessions of therapy, and find out whether the therapeutic alliance is maintained or unstable within that timeframe. METHODS: Thirty-four patients at a university psychological care service who had had at least five therapy sessions participated. Of these, 70.46% were women (Mage = 24.24, SD = 6.73). The patients filled out the Outcome Rating Scale and Session Rating Scale the week before each session. Data were analyzed by the Dual STATIS method. RESULTS: The compromise matrix explained 77.36% of the variability. The position of the vectors and the distribution of the position of the patients on the graph show that as their perception increased, therapeutic alliance remained stable. Moreover, the position of the vectors shows that the therapeutic alliance was forged in the first session and remained stable during the following sessions. CONCLUSION: This exploratory study demonstrated the importance of the first session in establishing the therapeutic alliance, and for it to remain stable, regardless of whether the rest of the therapeutic process has variations or changes. Novel use of the STATIS method for analyzing measurements in the first five sessions, showed that beginning the therapeutic intervention with a strong alliance, produced the favorable, lasting effects necessary for development of the intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9732893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97328932022-12-10 The first session is the one that counts: An exploratory study of therapeutic alliance del Río Olvera, Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Mora, Álvaro Senín-Calderón, Cristina Rodríguez-Testal, Juan F. Front Psychol Psychology BACKGROUND: The controversy about whether psychotherapy outcome is the consequence of the techniques themselves, common factors or both is still current. The importance of common factors has been demonstrated, although it is also known that they alone are insufficient. At the present time, the contextual model grants heavy weight to the therapeutic alliance in the first sessions and seems to predict positive final results. Furthermore, monitoring sessions has demonstrated that this alliance improves. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the relationship between the therapeutic alliance and patient’s perceived improvement during the first five sessions of therapy, and find out whether the therapeutic alliance is maintained or unstable within that timeframe. METHODS: Thirty-four patients at a university psychological care service who had had at least five therapy sessions participated. Of these, 70.46% were women (Mage = 24.24, SD = 6.73). The patients filled out the Outcome Rating Scale and Session Rating Scale the week before each session. Data were analyzed by the Dual STATIS method. RESULTS: The compromise matrix explained 77.36% of the variability. The position of the vectors and the distribution of the position of the patients on the graph show that as their perception increased, therapeutic alliance remained stable. Moreover, the position of the vectors shows that the therapeutic alliance was forged in the first session and remained stable during the following sessions. CONCLUSION: This exploratory study demonstrated the importance of the first session in establishing the therapeutic alliance, and for it to remain stable, regardless of whether the rest of the therapeutic process has variations or changes. Novel use of the STATIS method for analyzing measurements in the first five sessions, showed that beginning the therapeutic intervention with a strong alliance, produced the favorable, lasting effects necessary for development of the intervention. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9732893/ /pubmed/36507019 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1016963 Text en Copyright © 2022 del Río Olvera, Rodríguez-Mora, Senín-Calderón and Rodríguez-Testal. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
del Río Olvera, Francisco Javier
Rodríguez-Mora, Álvaro
Senín-Calderón, Cristina
Rodríguez-Testal, Juan F.
The first session is the one that counts: An exploratory study of therapeutic alliance
title The first session is the one that counts: An exploratory study of therapeutic alliance
title_full The first session is the one that counts: An exploratory study of therapeutic alliance
title_fullStr The first session is the one that counts: An exploratory study of therapeutic alliance
title_full_unstemmed The first session is the one that counts: An exploratory study of therapeutic alliance
title_short The first session is the one that counts: An exploratory study of therapeutic alliance
title_sort first session is the one that counts: an exploratory study of therapeutic alliance
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9732893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36507019
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1016963
work_keys_str_mv AT delrioolverafranciscojavier thefirstsessionistheonethatcountsanexploratorystudyoftherapeuticalliance
AT rodriguezmoraalvaro thefirstsessionistheonethatcountsanexploratorystudyoftherapeuticalliance
AT senincalderoncristina thefirstsessionistheonethatcountsanexploratorystudyoftherapeuticalliance
AT rodrigueztestaljuanf thefirstsessionistheonethatcountsanexploratorystudyoftherapeuticalliance
AT delrioolverafranciscojavier firstsessionistheonethatcountsanexploratorystudyoftherapeuticalliance
AT rodriguezmoraalvaro firstsessionistheonethatcountsanexploratorystudyoftherapeuticalliance
AT senincalderoncristina firstsessionistheonethatcountsanexploratorystudyoftherapeuticalliance
AT rodrigueztestaljuanf firstsessionistheonethatcountsanexploratorystudyoftherapeuticalliance