Cargando…

Current concepts in acromioclavicular joint (AC) instability – a proposed treatment algorithm for acute and chronic AC-joint surgery

BACKGROUND: There exists a vast number of surgical treatment options for acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries, and the current literature has yet to determine an equivocally superior treatment. AC joint repair has a long history and dates back to the beginning of the twentieth century. MAIN BODY: S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berthold, Daniel P., Muench, Lukas N., Dyrna, Felix, Mazzocca, Augustus D., Garvin, Patrick, Voss, Andreas, Scheiderer, Bastian, Siebenlist, Sebastian, Imhoff, Andreas B., Beitzel, Knut
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36494652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05935-0
_version_ 1784846282175545344
author Berthold, Daniel P.
Muench, Lukas N.
Dyrna, Felix
Mazzocca, Augustus D.
Garvin, Patrick
Voss, Andreas
Scheiderer, Bastian
Siebenlist, Sebastian
Imhoff, Andreas B.
Beitzel, Knut
author_facet Berthold, Daniel P.
Muench, Lukas N.
Dyrna, Felix
Mazzocca, Augustus D.
Garvin, Patrick
Voss, Andreas
Scheiderer, Bastian
Siebenlist, Sebastian
Imhoff, Andreas B.
Beitzel, Knut
author_sort Berthold, Daniel P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There exists a vast number of surgical treatment options for acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries, and the current literature has yet to determine an equivocally superior treatment. AC joint repair has a long history and dates back to the beginning of the twentieth century. MAIN BODY: Since then, over 150 different techniques have been described, covering open and closed techniques. Low grade injuries such as Type I-II according to the modified Rockwood classification should be treated conservatively, while high-grade injuries (types IV-VI) may be indicated for operative treatment. However, controversy exists if operative treatment is superior to nonoperative treatment, especially in grade III injuries, as functional impairment due to scapular dyskinesia or chronic pain remains concerning following non-operative treatment. Patients with a stable AC joint without overriding of the clavicle and without significant scapular dysfunction (Type IIIA) may benefit from non-interventional approaches, in contrast to patients with overriding of the clavicle and therapy-resistant scapular dysfunction (Type IIIB). If these patients are considered non-responders to a conservative approach, an anatomic AC joint reconstruction using a hybrid technique should be considered. In chronic AC joint injuries, surgery is indicated after failed nonoperative treatment of 3 to 6 months. Anatomic AC joint reconstruction techniques along with biologic augmentation (e.g. Hybrid techniques, suture fixation) should be considered for chronic high-grade instabilities, accounting for the lack of intrinsic healing and scar-forming potential of the ligamentous tissue in the chronic setting. However, complication and clinical failure rates remain high, which may be a result of technical failures or persistent horizontal and rotational instability. CONCLUSION: Future research should focus on addressing horizontal and rotational instability, to restore native physiological and biomechanical properties of the AC joint.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9733089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97330892022-12-10 Current concepts in acromioclavicular joint (AC) instability – a proposed treatment algorithm for acute and chronic AC-joint surgery Berthold, Daniel P. Muench, Lukas N. Dyrna, Felix Mazzocca, Augustus D. Garvin, Patrick Voss, Andreas Scheiderer, Bastian Siebenlist, Sebastian Imhoff, Andreas B. Beitzel, Knut BMC Musculoskelet Disord Review BACKGROUND: There exists a vast number of surgical treatment options for acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries, and the current literature has yet to determine an equivocally superior treatment. AC joint repair has a long history and dates back to the beginning of the twentieth century. MAIN BODY: Since then, over 150 different techniques have been described, covering open and closed techniques. Low grade injuries such as Type I-II according to the modified Rockwood classification should be treated conservatively, while high-grade injuries (types IV-VI) may be indicated for operative treatment. However, controversy exists if operative treatment is superior to nonoperative treatment, especially in grade III injuries, as functional impairment due to scapular dyskinesia or chronic pain remains concerning following non-operative treatment. Patients with a stable AC joint without overriding of the clavicle and without significant scapular dysfunction (Type IIIA) may benefit from non-interventional approaches, in contrast to patients with overriding of the clavicle and therapy-resistant scapular dysfunction (Type IIIB). If these patients are considered non-responders to a conservative approach, an anatomic AC joint reconstruction using a hybrid technique should be considered. In chronic AC joint injuries, surgery is indicated after failed nonoperative treatment of 3 to 6 months. Anatomic AC joint reconstruction techniques along with biologic augmentation (e.g. Hybrid techniques, suture fixation) should be considered for chronic high-grade instabilities, accounting for the lack of intrinsic healing and scar-forming potential of the ligamentous tissue in the chronic setting. However, complication and clinical failure rates remain high, which may be a result of technical failures or persistent horizontal and rotational instability. CONCLUSION: Future research should focus on addressing horizontal and rotational instability, to restore native physiological and biomechanical properties of the AC joint. BioMed Central 2022-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9733089/ /pubmed/36494652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05935-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Berthold, Daniel P.
Muench, Lukas N.
Dyrna, Felix
Mazzocca, Augustus D.
Garvin, Patrick
Voss, Andreas
Scheiderer, Bastian
Siebenlist, Sebastian
Imhoff, Andreas B.
Beitzel, Knut
Current concepts in acromioclavicular joint (AC) instability – a proposed treatment algorithm for acute and chronic AC-joint surgery
title Current concepts in acromioclavicular joint (AC) instability – a proposed treatment algorithm for acute and chronic AC-joint surgery
title_full Current concepts in acromioclavicular joint (AC) instability – a proposed treatment algorithm for acute and chronic AC-joint surgery
title_fullStr Current concepts in acromioclavicular joint (AC) instability – a proposed treatment algorithm for acute and chronic AC-joint surgery
title_full_unstemmed Current concepts in acromioclavicular joint (AC) instability – a proposed treatment algorithm for acute and chronic AC-joint surgery
title_short Current concepts in acromioclavicular joint (AC) instability – a proposed treatment algorithm for acute and chronic AC-joint surgery
title_sort current concepts in acromioclavicular joint (ac) instability – a proposed treatment algorithm for acute and chronic ac-joint surgery
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36494652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05935-0
work_keys_str_mv AT bertholddanielp currentconceptsinacromioclavicularjointacinstabilityaproposedtreatmentalgorithmforacuteandchronicacjointsurgery
AT muenchlukasn currentconceptsinacromioclavicularjointacinstabilityaproposedtreatmentalgorithmforacuteandchronicacjointsurgery
AT dyrnafelix currentconceptsinacromioclavicularjointacinstabilityaproposedtreatmentalgorithmforacuteandchronicacjointsurgery
AT mazzoccaaugustusd currentconceptsinacromioclavicularjointacinstabilityaproposedtreatmentalgorithmforacuteandchronicacjointsurgery
AT garvinpatrick currentconceptsinacromioclavicularjointacinstabilityaproposedtreatmentalgorithmforacuteandchronicacjointsurgery
AT vossandreas currentconceptsinacromioclavicularjointacinstabilityaproposedtreatmentalgorithmforacuteandchronicacjointsurgery
AT scheidererbastian currentconceptsinacromioclavicularjointacinstabilityaproposedtreatmentalgorithmforacuteandchronicacjointsurgery
AT siebenlistsebastian currentconceptsinacromioclavicularjointacinstabilityaproposedtreatmentalgorithmforacuteandchronicacjointsurgery
AT imhoffandreasb currentconceptsinacromioclavicularjointacinstabilityaproposedtreatmentalgorithmforacuteandchronicacjointsurgery
AT beitzelknut currentconceptsinacromioclavicularjointacinstabilityaproposedtreatmentalgorithmforacuteandchronicacjointsurgery