Cargando…
Project DECIDE, part 1: increasing the amount of valid advance directives in people with Alzheimer’s disease by offering advance care planning—a prospective double-arm intervention study
BACKGROUND: Everybody has the right to decide whether to receive specific medical treatment or not and to provide their free, prior and informed consent to do so. As dementia progresses, people with Alzheimer’s dementia (PwAD) can lose their capacity to provide informed consent to complex medical tr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36494718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00854-0 |
_version_ | 1784846282415669248 |
---|---|
author | Baisch, Stefanie Abele, Christina Theile-Schürholz, Anna Schmidtmann, Irene Oswald, Frank Karakaya, Tarik Müller, Tanja Florack, Janina Garmann, Daniel Karneboge, Jonas Lindl, Gregor Pfeiffer, Nathalie Poth, Aoife Caba, Bogdan Alin Grond, Martin Hornke, Ingmar Prvulovic, David Reif, Andreas Ullrich, Heiko Haberstroh, Julia |
author_facet | Baisch, Stefanie Abele, Christina Theile-Schürholz, Anna Schmidtmann, Irene Oswald, Frank Karakaya, Tarik Müller, Tanja Florack, Janina Garmann, Daniel Karneboge, Jonas Lindl, Gregor Pfeiffer, Nathalie Poth, Aoife Caba, Bogdan Alin Grond, Martin Hornke, Ingmar Prvulovic, David Reif, Andreas Ullrich, Heiko Haberstroh, Julia |
author_sort | Baisch, Stefanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Everybody has the right to decide whether to receive specific medical treatment or not and to provide their free, prior and informed consent to do so. As dementia progresses, people with Alzheimer’s dementia (PwAD) can lose their capacity to provide informed consent to complex medical treatment. When the capacity to consent is lost, the autonomy of the affected person can only be guaranteed when an interpretable and valid advance directive exists. Advance directives are not yet common in Germany, and their validity is often questionable. Once the dementia diagnosis has been made, it is assumed to be too late to write an advance directive. One approach used to support the completion of advance directives is ‘Respecting Choices’(®)—an internationally recognised, evidence-based model of Advance Care Planning (ACP), which, until now, has not been evaluated for the target group of PwAD. This study’s aims include (a) to investigate the proportion of valid advance directives in a memory clinic population of persons with suspected AD, (b) to determine the predictors of valid advance directives, and (c) to examine whether the offer of ACP can increase the proportion of valid advance directives in PwAD. METHOD: We intend to recruit at least N = 250 participants from two memory clinics in 50 consecutive weeks. Of these, the first 25 weeks constitute the baseline phase (no offer of ACP), the following 25 weeks constitute the intervention phase (offer of ACP). The existence and validity of an advance directive will be assessed twice (before and after the memory clinic appointment). Moreover, potential predictors of valid advance directives are assessed. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will enhance the development of consent procedures for advance directives of PwAD based on the ACP/Respecting Choices (R) approach. Therefore, this project contributes towards increasing the autonomy and inclusion of PwAD and the widespread acceptance of valid advance directives in PwAD. Trial Registration DRKS, DRKS00026691, registered 15th of October 2021, https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00026691 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9733090 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97330902022-12-10 Project DECIDE, part 1: increasing the amount of valid advance directives in people with Alzheimer’s disease by offering advance care planning—a prospective double-arm intervention study Baisch, Stefanie Abele, Christina Theile-Schürholz, Anna Schmidtmann, Irene Oswald, Frank Karakaya, Tarik Müller, Tanja Florack, Janina Garmann, Daniel Karneboge, Jonas Lindl, Gregor Pfeiffer, Nathalie Poth, Aoife Caba, Bogdan Alin Grond, Martin Hornke, Ingmar Prvulovic, David Reif, Andreas Ullrich, Heiko Haberstroh, Julia BMC Med Ethics Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Everybody has the right to decide whether to receive specific medical treatment or not and to provide their free, prior and informed consent to do so. As dementia progresses, people with Alzheimer’s dementia (PwAD) can lose their capacity to provide informed consent to complex medical treatment. When the capacity to consent is lost, the autonomy of the affected person can only be guaranteed when an interpretable and valid advance directive exists. Advance directives are not yet common in Germany, and their validity is often questionable. Once the dementia diagnosis has been made, it is assumed to be too late to write an advance directive. One approach used to support the completion of advance directives is ‘Respecting Choices’(®)—an internationally recognised, evidence-based model of Advance Care Planning (ACP), which, until now, has not been evaluated for the target group of PwAD. This study’s aims include (a) to investigate the proportion of valid advance directives in a memory clinic population of persons with suspected AD, (b) to determine the predictors of valid advance directives, and (c) to examine whether the offer of ACP can increase the proportion of valid advance directives in PwAD. METHOD: We intend to recruit at least N = 250 participants from two memory clinics in 50 consecutive weeks. Of these, the first 25 weeks constitute the baseline phase (no offer of ACP), the following 25 weeks constitute the intervention phase (offer of ACP). The existence and validity of an advance directive will be assessed twice (before and after the memory clinic appointment). Moreover, potential predictors of valid advance directives are assessed. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will enhance the development of consent procedures for advance directives of PwAD based on the ACP/Respecting Choices (R) approach. Therefore, this project contributes towards increasing the autonomy and inclusion of PwAD and the widespread acceptance of valid advance directives in PwAD. Trial Registration DRKS, DRKS00026691, registered 15th of October 2021, https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00026691 BioMed Central 2022-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9733090/ /pubmed/36494718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00854-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Baisch, Stefanie Abele, Christina Theile-Schürholz, Anna Schmidtmann, Irene Oswald, Frank Karakaya, Tarik Müller, Tanja Florack, Janina Garmann, Daniel Karneboge, Jonas Lindl, Gregor Pfeiffer, Nathalie Poth, Aoife Caba, Bogdan Alin Grond, Martin Hornke, Ingmar Prvulovic, David Reif, Andreas Ullrich, Heiko Haberstroh, Julia Project DECIDE, part 1: increasing the amount of valid advance directives in people with Alzheimer’s disease by offering advance care planning—a prospective double-arm intervention study |
title | Project DECIDE, part 1: increasing the amount of valid advance directives in people with Alzheimer’s disease by offering advance care planning—a prospective double-arm intervention study |
title_full | Project DECIDE, part 1: increasing the amount of valid advance directives in people with Alzheimer’s disease by offering advance care planning—a prospective double-arm intervention study |
title_fullStr | Project DECIDE, part 1: increasing the amount of valid advance directives in people with Alzheimer’s disease by offering advance care planning—a prospective double-arm intervention study |
title_full_unstemmed | Project DECIDE, part 1: increasing the amount of valid advance directives in people with Alzheimer’s disease by offering advance care planning—a prospective double-arm intervention study |
title_short | Project DECIDE, part 1: increasing the amount of valid advance directives in people with Alzheimer’s disease by offering advance care planning—a prospective double-arm intervention study |
title_sort | project decide, part 1: increasing the amount of valid advance directives in people with alzheimer’s disease by offering advance care planning—a prospective double-arm intervention study |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36494718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00854-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baischstefanie projectdecidepart1increasingtheamountofvalidadvancedirectivesinpeoplewithalzheimersdiseasebyofferingadvancecareplanningaprospectivedoublearminterventionstudy AT abelechristina projectdecidepart1increasingtheamountofvalidadvancedirectivesinpeoplewithalzheimersdiseasebyofferingadvancecareplanningaprospectivedoublearminterventionstudy AT theileschurholzanna projectdecidepart1increasingtheamountofvalidadvancedirectivesinpeoplewithalzheimersdiseasebyofferingadvancecareplanningaprospectivedoublearminterventionstudy AT schmidtmannirene projectdecidepart1increasingtheamountofvalidadvancedirectivesinpeoplewithalzheimersdiseasebyofferingadvancecareplanningaprospectivedoublearminterventionstudy AT oswaldfrank projectdecidepart1increasingtheamountofvalidadvancedirectivesinpeoplewithalzheimersdiseasebyofferingadvancecareplanningaprospectivedoublearminterventionstudy AT karakayatarik projectdecidepart1increasingtheamountofvalidadvancedirectivesinpeoplewithalzheimersdiseasebyofferingadvancecareplanningaprospectivedoublearminterventionstudy AT mullertanja projectdecidepart1increasingtheamountofvalidadvancedirectivesinpeoplewithalzheimersdiseasebyofferingadvancecareplanningaprospectivedoublearminterventionstudy AT florackjanina projectdecidepart1increasingtheamountofvalidadvancedirectivesinpeoplewithalzheimersdiseasebyofferingadvancecareplanningaprospectivedoublearminterventionstudy AT garmanndaniel projectdecidepart1increasingtheamountofvalidadvancedirectivesinpeoplewithalzheimersdiseasebyofferingadvancecareplanningaprospectivedoublearminterventionstudy AT karnebogejonas projectdecidepart1increasingtheamountofvalidadvancedirectivesinpeoplewithalzheimersdiseasebyofferingadvancecareplanningaprospectivedoublearminterventionstudy AT lindlgregor projectdecidepart1increasingtheamountofvalidadvancedirectivesinpeoplewithalzheimersdiseasebyofferingadvancecareplanningaprospectivedoublearminterventionstudy AT pfeiffernathalie projectdecidepart1increasingtheamountofvalidadvancedirectivesinpeoplewithalzheimersdiseasebyofferingadvancecareplanningaprospectivedoublearminterventionstudy AT pothaoife projectdecidepart1increasingtheamountofvalidadvancedirectivesinpeoplewithalzheimersdiseasebyofferingadvancecareplanningaprospectivedoublearminterventionstudy AT cababogdanalin projectdecidepart1increasingtheamountofvalidadvancedirectivesinpeoplewithalzheimersdiseasebyofferingadvancecareplanningaprospectivedoublearminterventionstudy AT grondmartin projectdecidepart1increasingtheamountofvalidadvancedirectivesinpeoplewithalzheimersdiseasebyofferingadvancecareplanningaprospectivedoublearminterventionstudy AT hornkeingmar projectdecidepart1increasingtheamountofvalidadvancedirectivesinpeoplewithalzheimersdiseasebyofferingadvancecareplanningaprospectivedoublearminterventionstudy AT prvulovicdavid projectdecidepart1increasingtheamountofvalidadvancedirectivesinpeoplewithalzheimersdiseasebyofferingadvancecareplanningaprospectivedoublearminterventionstudy AT reifandreas projectdecidepart1increasingtheamountofvalidadvancedirectivesinpeoplewithalzheimersdiseasebyofferingadvancecareplanningaprospectivedoublearminterventionstudy AT ullrichheiko projectdecidepart1increasingtheamountofvalidadvancedirectivesinpeoplewithalzheimersdiseasebyofferingadvancecareplanningaprospectivedoublearminterventionstudy AT haberstrohjulia projectdecidepart1increasingtheamountofvalidadvancedirectivesinpeoplewithalzheimersdiseasebyofferingadvancecareplanningaprospectivedoublearminterventionstudy |