Cargando…

Psychosocial working conditions as determinants of concerns to have made important medical errors and possible intermediate factors of this association among medical assistants – a cohort study

OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the association of psychosocial working conditions with concerns to have made important medical errors and to identify possible intermediate factors in this relationship. METHODS: We used data from 408 medical assistants (MAs) in Germany who participated in a 4-year p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mambrey, Viola, Angerer, Peter, Loerbroks, Adrian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36494848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08895-2
_version_ 1784846305936277504
author Mambrey, Viola
Angerer, Peter
Loerbroks, Adrian
author_facet Mambrey, Viola
Angerer, Peter
Loerbroks, Adrian
author_sort Mambrey, Viola
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the association of psychosocial working conditions with concerns to have made important medical errors and to identify possible intermediate factors in this relationship. METHODS: We used data from 408 medical assistants (MAs) in Germany who participated in a 4-year prospective cohort study (follow-up period: 03–05/2021). Psychosocial working conditions were assessed at baseline by the effort-reward imbalance questionnaire and by a MA-specific questionnaire with seven subscales. MAs reported at follow-up whether they are concerned to have made an important medical error throughout the last 3 months, 12 months or since baseline (yes/no). These variables were merged into a single variable (any affirmative response vs. none) for primary analyses. Potential intermediate factors measured at baseline included work engagement (i.e., vigor and dedication, assessed by the UWES), work satisfaction (COPSOQ), depression (PHQ-2), anxiety (GAD-2) and self-rated health. We ran Poisson regression models with a log-link function to estimate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Doing so, we employed the psychosocial working condition scales as continuous variables (i.e. z-scores) in the primary analyses. Potential intermediate factors were added separately to the regression models. RESULTS: Poor collaboration was the only working condition, which was significantly predictive of the concern of having made an important medical error (RR = 1.26, 95%CI = 1.00–1.57, p = 0.049). Partial intermediate factors in this association were vigor, depression and anxiety. CONCLUSION: We found weak and mostly statistically non-significant associations. The only exception was poor collaboration whose association with concerns to have made an important medical error was partially explained by vigor and poor mental health. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08895-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9733172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97331722022-12-10 Psychosocial working conditions as determinants of concerns to have made important medical errors and possible intermediate factors of this association among medical assistants – a cohort study Mambrey, Viola Angerer, Peter Loerbroks, Adrian BMC Health Serv Res Research OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the association of psychosocial working conditions with concerns to have made important medical errors and to identify possible intermediate factors in this relationship. METHODS: We used data from 408 medical assistants (MAs) in Germany who participated in a 4-year prospective cohort study (follow-up period: 03–05/2021). Psychosocial working conditions were assessed at baseline by the effort-reward imbalance questionnaire and by a MA-specific questionnaire with seven subscales. MAs reported at follow-up whether they are concerned to have made an important medical error throughout the last 3 months, 12 months or since baseline (yes/no). These variables were merged into a single variable (any affirmative response vs. none) for primary analyses. Potential intermediate factors measured at baseline included work engagement (i.e., vigor and dedication, assessed by the UWES), work satisfaction (COPSOQ), depression (PHQ-2), anxiety (GAD-2) and self-rated health. We ran Poisson regression models with a log-link function to estimate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Doing so, we employed the psychosocial working condition scales as continuous variables (i.e. z-scores) in the primary analyses. Potential intermediate factors were added separately to the regression models. RESULTS: Poor collaboration was the only working condition, which was significantly predictive of the concern of having made an important medical error (RR = 1.26, 95%CI = 1.00–1.57, p = 0.049). Partial intermediate factors in this association were vigor, depression and anxiety. CONCLUSION: We found weak and mostly statistically non-significant associations. The only exception was poor collaboration whose association with concerns to have made an important medical error was partially explained by vigor and poor mental health. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08895-2. BioMed Central 2022-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9733172/ /pubmed/36494848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08895-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Mambrey, Viola
Angerer, Peter
Loerbroks, Adrian
Psychosocial working conditions as determinants of concerns to have made important medical errors and possible intermediate factors of this association among medical assistants – a cohort study
title Psychosocial working conditions as determinants of concerns to have made important medical errors and possible intermediate factors of this association among medical assistants – a cohort study
title_full Psychosocial working conditions as determinants of concerns to have made important medical errors and possible intermediate factors of this association among medical assistants – a cohort study
title_fullStr Psychosocial working conditions as determinants of concerns to have made important medical errors and possible intermediate factors of this association among medical assistants – a cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Psychosocial working conditions as determinants of concerns to have made important medical errors and possible intermediate factors of this association among medical assistants – a cohort study
title_short Psychosocial working conditions as determinants of concerns to have made important medical errors and possible intermediate factors of this association among medical assistants – a cohort study
title_sort psychosocial working conditions as determinants of concerns to have made important medical errors and possible intermediate factors of this association among medical assistants – a cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36494848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08895-2
work_keys_str_mv AT mambreyviola psychosocialworkingconditionsasdeterminantsofconcernstohavemadeimportantmedicalerrorsandpossibleintermediatefactorsofthisassociationamongmedicalassistantsacohortstudy
AT angererpeter psychosocialworkingconditionsasdeterminantsofconcernstohavemadeimportantmedicalerrorsandpossibleintermediatefactorsofthisassociationamongmedicalassistantsacohortstudy
AT loerbroksadrian psychosocialworkingconditionsasdeterminantsofconcernstohavemadeimportantmedicalerrorsandpossibleintermediatefactorsofthisassociationamongmedicalassistantsacohortstudy