Cargando…
Evidence-based family planning services among publicly funded providers in Texas
BACKGROUND: Healthy Texas Women (HTW) is a fee-for-service family planning program that excludes affiliates of abortion providers. The HTW network includes providers who participate in Title X or the state Family Planning Program (FPP) and primary care providers without additional family planning fu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36482413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08889-0 |
_version_ | 1784846321797038080 |
---|---|
author | Vohra-Gupta, Shetal Ela, Elizabeth Vizcarra, Elsa Petruzzi, Liana J. Hopkins, Kristine Potter, Joseph E. White, Kari |
author_facet | Vohra-Gupta, Shetal Ela, Elizabeth Vizcarra, Elsa Petruzzi, Liana J. Hopkins, Kristine Potter, Joseph E. White, Kari |
author_sort | Vohra-Gupta, Shetal |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Healthy Texas Women (HTW) is a fee-for-service family planning program that excludes affiliates of abortion providers. The HTW network includes providers who participate in Title X or the state Family Planning Program (FPP) and primary care providers without additional family planning funding (HTW-only). The objective of this study is to compare client volume and use of evidence-based practices among HTW providers. METHODS: Client volume was determined from administrative data on unduplicated HTW clients served in fiscal year (FY) 2017. A sample of 114 HTW providers, stratified by region, completed a 2018 survey about contraceptive methods offered, adherence to evidence-based contraceptive provision, barriers to offering IUDs and implants, and counseling/referrals for pregnant patients. Differences by funding source were assessed using t-tests and chi-square tests. RESULTS: Although HTW-only providers served 58% of HTW clients, most (72%) saw < 50 clients in FY2017. Only 5% of HTW providers received Title X or FPP funding, but 46% served ≥ 500 HTW clients. HTW-only providers were less likely than Title X providers to offer hormonal IUDs (70% vs. 92%) and implants (66% vs 96%); offer same-day placement of IUDs (21% vs 79%) and implants (21% vs 83%); and allow patients to delay cervical cancer screening when initiating contraception (58% vs 83%; all p < 0.05). There were few provider-level differences in counseling/referrals for unplanned pregnancy (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: HTW-only providers served fewer clients and were less likely to follow evidence-based practices. Program modifications that strengthen the provider network and quality of care are needed to support family planning services for low-income Texans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9733229 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97332292022-12-10 Evidence-based family planning services among publicly funded providers in Texas Vohra-Gupta, Shetal Ela, Elizabeth Vizcarra, Elsa Petruzzi, Liana J. Hopkins, Kristine Potter, Joseph E. White, Kari BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Healthy Texas Women (HTW) is a fee-for-service family planning program that excludes affiliates of abortion providers. The HTW network includes providers who participate in Title X or the state Family Planning Program (FPP) and primary care providers without additional family planning funding (HTW-only). The objective of this study is to compare client volume and use of evidence-based practices among HTW providers. METHODS: Client volume was determined from administrative data on unduplicated HTW clients served in fiscal year (FY) 2017. A sample of 114 HTW providers, stratified by region, completed a 2018 survey about contraceptive methods offered, adherence to evidence-based contraceptive provision, barriers to offering IUDs and implants, and counseling/referrals for pregnant patients. Differences by funding source were assessed using t-tests and chi-square tests. RESULTS: Although HTW-only providers served 58% of HTW clients, most (72%) saw < 50 clients in FY2017. Only 5% of HTW providers received Title X or FPP funding, but 46% served ≥ 500 HTW clients. HTW-only providers were less likely than Title X providers to offer hormonal IUDs (70% vs. 92%) and implants (66% vs 96%); offer same-day placement of IUDs (21% vs 79%) and implants (21% vs 83%); and allow patients to delay cervical cancer screening when initiating contraception (58% vs 83%; all p < 0.05). There were few provider-level differences in counseling/referrals for unplanned pregnancy (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: HTW-only providers served fewer clients and were less likely to follow evidence-based practices. Program modifications that strengthen the provider network and quality of care are needed to support family planning services for low-income Texans. BioMed Central 2022-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9733229/ /pubmed/36482413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08889-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Vohra-Gupta, Shetal Ela, Elizabeth Vizcarra, Elsa Petruzzi, Liana J. Hopkins, Kristine Potter, Joseph E. White, Kari Evidence-based family planning services among publicly funded providers in Texas |
title | Evidence-based family planning services among publicly funded providers in Texas |
title_full | Evidence-based family planning services among publicly funded providers in Texas |
title_fullStr | Evidence-based family planning services among publicly funded providers in Texas |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence-based family planning services among publicly funded providers in Texas |
title_short | Evidence-based family planning services among publicly funded providers in Texas |
title_sort | evidence-based family planning services among publicly funded providers in texas |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36482413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08889-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vohraguptashetal evidencebasedfamilyplanningservicesamongpubliclyfundedprovidersintexas AT elaelizabeth evidencebasedfamilyplanningservicesamongpubliclyfundedprovidersintexas AT vizcarraelsa evidencebasedfamilyplanningservicesamongpubliclyfundedprovidersintexas AT petruzzilianaj evidencebasedfamilyplanningservicesamongpubliclyfundedprovidersintexas AT hopkinskristine evidencebasedfamilyplanningservicesamongpubliclyfundedprovidersintexas AT potterjosephe evidencebasedfamilyplanningservicesamongpubliclyfundedprovidersintexas AT whitekari evidencebasedfamilyplanningservicesamongpubliclyfundedprovidersintexas |