Cargando…
Residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage: what is the best intervention strategy?
BACKGROUND: The best intervention approach for residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage remains controversial, especially during the period of indwelling T tube and the formation of a sinus. The purpose of the study was to estimate the effects of two therapeutic modalit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36494797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02601-6 |
_version_ | 1784846330563133440 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Li Li, Lu Yao, Junfang Chu, Feifei Zhang, Yong Wu, Huili |
author_facet | Zhang, Li Li, Lu Yao, Junfang Chu, Feifei Zhang, Yong Wu, Huili |
author_sort | Zhang, Li |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The best intervention approach for residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage remains controversial, especially during the period of indwelling T tube and the formation of a sinus. The purpose of the study was to estimate the effects of two therapeutic modalities, namely endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and choledochfiberscope via the T-tube sinus tract (CDS) on residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage. METHODS: A total of 112 patients with residual choledocholithiasis after choledochotomy were included in the study, 50 of which underwent ERCP and 62 patients experienced choledochoscopy via the T-tube sinus tract. The primary outcome measures included the success rate of remove biliary stones, T-tube drainage time, and the average length of hospital stay. The secondary objective was to consider incidence of adverse events including cholangitis, bile leakage, T-tube migration, pancreatitis, bleeding and perforation. After hospital discharge, patients were followed up for two years and the recurrence of choledocholithiasis was recorded. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the success rate of stone removal between the two groups. Compared to CDS group, T-tube drainage time and the average length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the ERCP group. The incidence of complications (cholangitis and bile leakage) in the ERCP group was lower than that in the CDS group, but there was no statistically significant difference. When the T-tube sinus tract is not maturation, ERCP was the more appropriate endoscopic intervention to remove residual choledocholithiasis, particularly complicated with cholangitis at this time period. CONCLUSIONS: ERCP is a safe and effective endoscopic intervention to remove residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube Drainage without the condition of T-tube sinus tract restriction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9733260 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97332602022-12-10 Residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage: what is the best intervention strategy? Zhang, Li Li, Lu Yao, Junfang Chu, Feifei Zhang, Yong Wu, Huili BMC Gastroenterol Research BACKGROUND: The best intervention approach for residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage remains controversial, especially during the period of indwelling T tube and the formation of a sinus. The purpose of the study was to estimate the effects of two therapeutic modalities, namely endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and choledochfiberscope via the T-tube sinus tract (CDS) on residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage. METHODS: A total of 112 patients with residual choledocholithiasis after choledochotomy were included in the study, 50 of which underwent ERCP and 62 patients experienced choledochoscopy via the T-tube sinus tract. The primary outcome measures included the success rate of remove biliary stones, T-tube drainage time, and the average length of hospital stay. The secondary objective was to consider incidence of adverse events including cholangitis, bile leakage, T-tube migration, pancreatitis, bleeding and perforation. After hospital discharge, patients were followed up for two years and the recurrence of choledocholithiasis was recorded. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the success rate of stone removal between the two groups. Compared to CDS group, T-tube drainage time and the average length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the ERCP group. The incidence of complications (cholangitis and bile leakage) in the ERCP group was lower than that in the CDS group, but there was no statistically significant difference. When the T-tube sinus tract is not maturation, ERCP was the more appropriate endoscopic intervention to remove residual choledocholithiasis, particularly complicated with cholangitis at this time period. CONCLUSIONS: ERCP is a safe and effective endoscopic intervention to remove residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube Drainage without the condition of T-tube sinus tract restriction. BioMed Central 2022-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9733260/ /pubmed/36494797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02601-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Zhang, Li Li, Lu Yao, Junfang Chu, Feifei Zhang, Yong Wu, Huili Residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage: what is the best intervention strategy? |
title | Residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage: what is the best intervention strategy? |
title_full | Residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage: what is the best intervention strategy? |
title_fullStr | Residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage: what is the best intervention strategy? |
title_full_unstemmed | Residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage: what is the best intervention strategy? |
title_short | Residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage: what is the best intervention strategy? |
title_sort | residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy t-tube drainage: what is the best intervention strategy? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36494797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02601-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangli residualcholedocholithiasisaftercholedocholithotomyttubedrainagewhatisthebestinterventionstrategy AT lilu residualcholedocholithiasisaftercholedocholithotomyttubedrainagewhatisthebestinterventionstrategy AT yaojunfang residualcholedocholithiasisaftercholedocholithotomyttubedrainagewhatisthebestinterventionstrategy AT chufeifei residualcholedocholithiasisaftercholedocholithotomyttubedrainagewhatisthebestinterventionstrategy AT zhangyong residualcholedocholithiasisaftercholedocholithotomyttubedrainagewhatisthebestinterventionstrategy AT wuhuili residualcholedocholithiasisaftercholedocholithotomyttubedrainagewhatisthebestinterventionstrategy |