Cargando…

Residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage: what is the best intervention strategy?

BACKGROUND: The best intervention approach for residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage remains controversial, especially during the period of indwelling T tube and the formation of a sinus. The purpose of the study was to estimate the effects of two therapeutic modalit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Li, Li, Lu, Yao, Junfang, Chu, Feifei, Zhang, Yong, Wu, Huili
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36494797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02601-6
_version_ 1784846330563133440
author Zhang, Li
Li, Lu
Yao, Junfang
Chu, Feifei
Zhang, Yong
Wu, Huili
author_facet Zhang, Li
Li, Lu
Yao, Junfang
Chu, Feifei
Zhang, Yong
Wu, Huili
author_sort Zhang, Li
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The best intervention approach for residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage remains controversial, especially during the period of indwelling T tube and the formation of a sinus. The purpose of the study was to estimate the effects of two therapeutic modalities, namely endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and choledochfiberscope via the T-tube sinus tract (CDS) on residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage. METHODS: A total of 112 patients with residual choledocholithiasis after choledochotomy were included in the study, 50 of which underwent ERCP and 62 patients experienced choledochoscopy via the T-tube sinus tract. The primary outcome measures included the success rate of remove biliary stones, T-tube drainage time, and the average length of hospital stay. The secondary objective was to consider incidence of adverse events including cholangitis, bile leakage, T-tube migration, pancreatitis, bleeding and perforation. After hospital discharge, patients were followed up for two years and the recurrence of choledocholithiasis was recorded. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the success rate of stone removal between the two groups. Compared to CDS group, T-tube drainage time and the average length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the ERCP group. The incidence of complications (cholangitis and bile leakage) in the ERCP group was lower than that in the CDS group, but there was no statistically significant difference. When the T-tube sinus tract is not maturation, ERCP was the more appropriate endoscopic intervention to remove residual choledocholithiasis, particularly complicated with cholangitis at this time period. CONCLUSIONS: ERCP is a safe and effective endoscopic intervention to remove residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube Drainage without the condition of T-tube sinus tract restriction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9733260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97332602022-12-10 Residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage: what is the best intervention strategy? Zhang, Li Li, Lu Yao, Junfang Chu, Feifei Zhang, Yong Wu, Huili BMC Gastroenterol Research BACKGROUND: The best intervention approach for residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage remains controversial, especially during the period of indwelling T tube and the formation of a sinus. The purpose of the study was to estimate the effects of two therapeutic modalities, namely endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and choledochfiberscope via the T-tube sinus tract (CDS) on residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage. METHODS: A total of 112 patients with residual choledocholithiasis after choledochotomy were included in the study, 50 of which underwent ERCP and 62 patients experienced choledochoscopy via the T-tube sinus tract. The primary outcome measures included the success rate of remove biliary stones, T-tube drainage time, and the average length of hospital stay. The secondary objective was to consider incidence of adverse events including cholangitis, bile leakage, T-tube migration, pancreatitis, bleeding and perforation. After hospital discharge, patients were followed up for two years and the recurrence of choledocholithiasis was recorded. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the success rate of stone removal between the two groups. Compared to CDS group, T-tube drainage time and the average length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the ERCP group. The incidence of complications (cholangitis and bile leakage) in the ERCP group was lower than that in the CDS group, but there was no statistically significant difference. When the T-tube sinus tract is not maturation, ERCP was the more appropriate endoscopic intervention to remove residual choledocholithiasis, particularly complicated with cholangitis at this time period. CONCLUSIONS: ERCP is a safe and effective endoscopic intervention to remove residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube Drainage without the condition of T-tube sinus tract restriction. BioMed Central 2022-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9733260/ /pubmed/36494797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02601-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zhang, Li
Li, Lu
Yao, Junfang
Chu, Feifei
Zhang, Yong
Wu, Huili
Residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage: what is the best intervention strategy?
title Residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage: what is the best intervention strategy?
title_full Residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage: what is the best intervention strategy?
title_fullStr Residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage: what is the best intervention strategy?
title_full_unstemmed Residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage: what is the best intervention strategy?
title_short Residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage: what is the best intervention strategy?
title_sort residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy t-tube drainage: what is the best intervention strategy?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36494797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02601-6
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangli residualcholedocholithiasisaftercholedocholithotomyttubedrainagewhatisthebestinterventionstrategy
AT lilu residualcholedocholithiasisaftercholedocholithotomyttubedrainagewhatisthebestinterventionstrategy
AT yaojunfang residualcholedocholithiasisaftercholedocholithotomyttubedrainagewhatisthebestinterventionstrategy
AT chufeifei residualcholedocholithiasisaftercholedocholithotomyttubedrainagewhatisthebestinterventionstrategy
AT zhangyong residualcholedocholithiasisaftercholedocholithotomyttubedrainagewhatisthebestinterventionstrategy
AT wuhuili residualcholedocholithiasisaftercholedocholithotomyttubedrainagewhatisthebestinterventionstrategy