Cargando…

Factors affecting low fetal fraction in fetal screening with cell-free DNA in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Cell-Free DNA (cfDNA) is a non-invasive perinatal test (NIPT) used to assess fetal anomalies. The ability to detect fetal chromosomal aneuploidies is directly related to a sample’s fetal to total DNA fraction, known as the fetal fraction (FF). The minimum FF is considered 4%, and the tes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mousavi, Sanaz, Shokri, Ziba, Bastani, Parvin, Ghojazadeh, Morteza, Riahifar, Sevda, Nateghian, Hooman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36482322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05224-7
_version_ 1784846345333374976
author Mousavi, Sanaz
Shokri, Ziba
Bastani, Parvin
Ghojazadeh, Morteza
Riahifar, Sevda
Nateghian, Hooman
author_facet Mousavi, Sanaz
Shokri, Ziba
Bastani, Parvin
Ghojazadeh, Morteza
Riahifar, Sevda
Nateghian, Hooman
author_sort Mousavi, Sanaz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cell-Free DNA (cfDNA) is a non-invasive perinatal test (NIPT) used to assess fetal anomalies. The ability to detect fetal chromosomal aneuploidies is directly related to a sample’s fetal to total DNA fraction, known as the fetal fraction (FF). The minimum FF is considered 4%, and the test result below 4% is uncertain due to low fetal fraction (LFF). This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and a meta-analysis to determine the possible factors affecting LFF in cfDNA testing for fetal screening. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Since Direct, Scopus, CINHAL, Cochrane Library, and Persian databases, including Scientific Information Database, Irandoc, and Magiran were searched for studies investigating factors affecting LFF in cfDNA testing from 2000 until the end of 2021. Gathered data were analyzed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software version 3.3.070. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal of Cohort Studies tool. RESULTS: Thirteen articles related to the topic were included, and seven related articles were reviewed for meta-analysis. The other six were reviewed qualitatively. Four factors were identified that might have a potential effect on the LFF, of which only gestational age had a significant association with LFF (Pooled mean difference= -1.111, SE = 0.515, 95% CI= -2.121, -0.101, (P-value < 0.05)). Maternal age (P-value = 0.573), maternal weight (P-value = 0.113), and Body Mass Index (P-value = 0.104) had no statically significant effect. The effect size was pooled by mean difference and 95% confidence interval. CONCLUSION: Lower gestational age is significantly associated with LFF. Thus, this factor can be considered when interpreting prenatal cfDNA screening tests. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-05224-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9733315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97333152022-12-10 Factors affecting low fetal fraction in fetal screening with cell-free DNA in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis Mousavi, Sanaz Shokri, Ziba Bastani, Parvin Ghojazadeh, Morteza Riahifar, Sevda Nateghian, Hooman BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: Cell-Free DNA (cfDNA) is a non-invasive perinatal test (NIPT) used to assess fetal anomalies. The ability to detect fetal chromosomal aneuploidies is directly related to a sample’s fetal to total DNA fraction, known as the fetal fraction (FF). The minimum FF is considered 4%, and the test result below 4% is uncertain due to low fetal fraction (LFF). This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and a meta-analysis to determine the possible factors affecting LFF in cfDNA testing for fetal screening. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Since Direct, Scopus, CINHAL, Cochrane Library, and Persian databases, including Scientific Information Database, Irandoc, and Magiran were searched for studies investigating factors affecting LFF in cfDNA testing from 2000 until the end of 2021. Gathered data were analyzed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software version 3.3.070. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal of Cohort Studies tool. RESULTS: Thirteen articles related to the topic were included, and seven related articles were reviewed for meta-analysis. The other six were reviewed qualitatively. Four factors were identified that might have a potential effect on the LFF, of which only gestational age had a significant association with LFF (Pooled mean difference= -1.111, SE = 0.515, 95% CI= -2.121, -0.101, (P-value < 0.05)). Maternal age (P-value = 0.573), maternal weight (P-value = 0.113), and Body Mass Index (P-value = 0.104) had no statically significant effect. The effect size was pooled by mean difference and 95% confidence interval. CONCLUSION: Lower gestational age is significantly associated with LFF. Thus, this factor can be considered when interpreting prenatal cfDNA screening tests. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-05224-7. BioMed Central 2022-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9733315/ /pubmed/36482322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05224-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Mousavi, Sanaz
Shokri, Ziba
Bastani, Parvin
Ghojazadeh, Morteza
Riahifar, Sevda
Nateghian, Hooman
Factors affecting low fetal fraction in fetal screening with cell-free DNA in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Factors affecting low fetal fraction in fetal screening with cell-free DNA in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Factors affecting low fetal fraction in fetal screening with cell-free DNA in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Factors affecting low fetal fraction in fetal screening with cell-free DNA in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Factors affecting low fetal fraction in fetal screening with cell-free DNA in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Factors affecting low fetal fraction in fetal screening with cell-free DNA in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort factors affecting low fetal fraction in fetal screening with cell-free dna in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36482322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05224-7
work_keys_str_mv AT mousavisanaz factorsaffectinglowfetalfractioninfetalscreeningwithcellfreednainpregnantwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shokriziba factorsaffectinglowfetalfractioninfetalscreeningwithcellfreednainpregnantwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bastaniparvin factorsaffectinglowfetalfractioninfetalscreeningwithcellfreednainpregnantwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ghojazadehmorteza factorsaffectinglowfetalfractioninfetalscreeningwithcellfreednainpregnantwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT riahifarsevda factorsaffectinglowfetalfractioninfetalscreeningwithcellfreednainpregnantwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nateghianhooman factorsaffectinglowfetalfractioninfetalscreeningwithcellfreednainpregnantwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis