Cargando…
Endometrial microstimulation effects on endometrial receptivity assessed by transvaginal color Doppler sonography
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the effect of endometrial microstimulation (EM) on endometrial receptivity using transvaginal color Doppler sonography (TVCDS). METHOD: Women of childbearing age who were preparing to conceive (n = 90) were randomly divided into the EM group (n = 30), who were exam...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36494793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02096-z |
_version_ | 1784846351862857728 |
---|---|
author | Cheng, Fang Xv, Bao-Mei Liu, Yan-Lin Sun, Rui Wang, Lin Yi, Jin-Ling |
author_facet | Cheng, Fang Xv, Bao-Mei Liu, Yan-Lin Sun, Rui Wang, Lin Yi, Jin-Ling |
author_sort | Cheng, Fang |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the effect of endometrial microstimulation (EM) on endometrial receptivity using transvaginal color Doppler sonography (TVCDS). METHOD: Women of childbearing age who were preparing to conceive (n = 90) were randomly divided into the EM group (n = 30), who were examined by EM on days 3–5 of the menstrual cycle, and the control group (n = 60). TVCDS was conducted during the implantation window phase, and endometrial thickness, endometrial pattern, endometrial movement, blood flow type, and uterine and spiral arterial hemodynamic parameter measurements were made. The groups were compared to identify differences. RESULTS: Endometrial thickness (0.97 ± 0.18 cm and 0.95 ± 0.17 cm), endometrial movement (type 1: 46.7% and 51.7%; type 2: 30.0% and 28.3%; type 3: 6.7% and 5.0%; type 5: 16.7% and 15.0%), and hemodynamic parameters of the uterine (pulsatility index [PI]: 2.46 ± 0.50 and 2.41 ± 0.48; resistance index [RI]: 0.85 ± 0.05 and 0.84 ± 0.05) and spiral (PI: 1.11 ± 0.32 and 1.19 ± 0.33; RI: 0.48 ± 0.11 and 0.51 ± 0.08) arteries did not differ significantly between groups (P > 0.05). However, the endometrial pattern (a trilaminar pattern: 80.0% and 58.3%; P = 0.041) and blood flow type (type I: 16.7% and 43.3%; type II: 63.3% and 40.0%; type III 20.0% and 16.7%; P = 0.038) differed significantly between groups. CONCLUSION: Endometrial microstimulation did not alter endometrial pathological staging, endometrial thickness, or movement, nor did it affect uterine and spiral arterial blood flow parameters. However, it may be able to abrade abnormal endometrial tissue, optimizing the endometrial pattern. Endometrial microstimulation may support local spiral artery regeneration and increase endometrial blood supply in new cycles. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9733341 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97333412022-12-10 Endometrial microstimulation effects on endometrial receptivity assessed by transvaginal color Doppler sonography Cheng, Fang Xv, Bao-Mei Liu, Yan-Lin Sun, Rui Wang, Lin Yi, Jin-Ling BMC Womens Health Research OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the effect of endometrial microstimulation (EM) on endometrial receptivity using transvaginal color Doppler sonography (TVCDS). METHOD: Women of childbearing age who were preparing to conceive (n = 90) were randomly divided into the EM group (n = 30), who were examined by EM on days 3–5 of the menstrual cycle, and the control group (n = 60). TVCDS was conducted during the implantation window phase, and endometrial thickness, endometrial pattern, endometrial movement, blood flow type, and uterine and spiral arterial hemodynamic parameter measurements were made. The groups were compared to identify differences. RESULTS: Endometrial thickness (0.97 ± 0.18 cm and 0.95 ± 0.17 cm), endometrial movement (type 1: 46.7% and 51.7%; type 2: 30.0% and 28.3%; type 3: 6.7% and 5.0%; type 5: 16.7% and 15.0%), and hemodynamic parameters of the uterine (pulsatility index [PI]: 2.46 ± 0.50 and 2.41 ± 0.48; resistance index [RI]: 0.85 ± 0.05 and 0.84 ± 0.05) and spiral (PI: 1.11 ± 0.32 and 1.19 ± 0.33; RI: 0.48 ± 0.11 and 0.51 ± 0.08) arteries did not differ significantly between groups (P > 0.05). However, the endometrial pattern (a trilaminar pattern: 80.0% and 58.3%; P = 0.041) and blood flow type (type I: 16.7% and 43.3%; type II: 63.3% and 40.0%; type III 20.0% and 16.7%; P = 0.038) differed significantly between groups. CONCLUSION: Endometrial microstimulation did not alter endometrial pathological staging, endometrial thickness, or movement, nor did it affect uterine and spiral arterial blood flow parameters. However, it may be able to abrade abnormal endometrial tissue, optimizing the endometrial pattern. Endometrial microstimulation may support local spiral artery regeneration and increase endometrial blood supply in new cycles. BioMed Central 2022-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9733341/ /pubmed/36494793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02096-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Cheng, Fang Xv, Bao-Mei Liu, Yan-Lin Sun, Rui Wang, Lin Yi, Jin-Ling Endometrial microstimulation effects on endometrial receptivity assessed by transvaginal color Doppler sonography |
title | Endometrial microstimulation effects on endometrial receptivity assessed by transvaginal color Doppler sonography |
title_full | Endometrial microstimulation effects on endometrial receptivity assessed by transvaginal color Doppler sonography |
title_fullStr | Endometrial microstimulation effects on endometrial receptivity assessed by transvaginal color Doppler sonography |
title_full_unstemmed | Endometrial microstimulation effects on endometrial receptivity assessed by transvaginal color Doppler sonography |
title_short | Endometrial microstimulation effects on endometrial receptivity assessed by transvaginal color Doppler sonography |
title_sort | endometrial microstimulation effects on endometrial receptivity assessed by transvaginal color doppler sonography |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36494793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02096-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chengfang endometrialmicrostimulationeffectsonendometrialreceptivityassessedbytransvaginalcolordopplersonography AT xvbaomei endometrialmicrostimulationeffectsonendometrialreceptivityassessedbytransvaginalcolordopplersonography AT liuyanlin endometrialmicrostimulationeffectsonendometrialreceptivityassessedbytransvaginalcolordopplersonography AT sunrui endometrialmicrostimulationeffectsonendometrialreceptivityassessedbytransvaginalcolordopplersonography AT wanglin endometrialmicrostimulationeffectsonendometrialreceptivityassessedbytransvaginalcolordopplersonography AT yijinling endometrialmicrostimulationeffectsonendometrialreceptivityassessedbytransvaginalcolordopplersonography |