Cargando…

One-year clinical evaluation of class II bulk-fill restorations in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial

This double-blind, randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the clinical performance and clinical time to restore occluso-proximal cavities in primary molars withbulk-fillresin and conventional resin. A total of 140 class II restorations in primary molars of 65 participants (mean age of 6.7 + 1.5)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Gindri, Larissa D’Olanda, Cassol, Igor Perlin, Fröhlich, Tatiana Tambara, Rocha, Rachel de Oliveira
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto 2022
Materias:	Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36477958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202205069

Ejemplares similares

Marginal integrity of classical and bulk-fill composite restorations in permanent and primary molars
por: Hamza, Blend, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Evaluation of microleakage in class-II bulk-fill composite restorations
por: Turkistani, Alaa, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

One-year results of a novel self-adhesive bulk-fill restorative and a conventional bulk-fill composite in class II cavities—a randomized clinical split-mouth study
por: Cieplik, Fabian, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Microleakage of Two Bulk Fill and One Conventional Composite in Class II Restorations of Primary Posterior Teeth
por: Mosharrafian, Shahram, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

In vitro microleakage at the enamel and dentin margins of class II cavities of primary molars restored with a bulk‐fill and a conventional composite
por: Mosharrafian, Shahram, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Fracture resistance of pulpotomized and composite-restored primary molars: Incremental versus bulk-fill techniques
por: Ghajari, Masoud Fallahinejad, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

One-year clinical results of restorations using a novel self-adhesive resin-based bulk-fill restorative
por: Rathke, Andreas, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Does Bleaching Affect the Microleakage of Class II Restoration with Bulk-Fill Composite?
por: Zajkani, Elham, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Factors affecting marginal integrity of class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations
por: Savadi Oskoee, Siavash, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Evaluation of microleakage in Class II composite restorations: Bonded-base and bulk-fill techniques
por: Feiz, Atiyeh, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

One-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill composite resin restorations plasticized by preheating and ultrasonics: A randomized clinical trial
por: Sajjan, Girija S, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Color stability of Bulk-Fill composite restorations
por: Silva, Marianna-Falcão, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Flowable Bulk-Fill Materials Compared to Nano Ceramic Composites for Class I Cavities Restorations in Primary Molars: A Two-Year Prospective Case-Control Study
por: Sarapultseva, Maria, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Influence of Matrix Type on Marginal Gap Formation of Deep Class II Bulk-Fill Composite Restorations
por: Hahn, Britta, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Effect of Stress Generated by Occlusal Cyclic Force on Class I Bulk-Fill Composite Restoration Microleakage
por: Ritthiti, Apirat, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Marginal Sealing of Bulk Fill versus Conventional Composites in Class II Composite Restorations: An In Vitro Study
por: Shadman, Niloofar, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Clinical Effectiveness of Bulk-Fill and Conventional Resin Composite Restorations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
por: Arbildo-Vega, Heber Isac, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A 3-year retrospective study of clinical durability of bulk-filled resin composite restorations
por: Ugurlu, Muhittin, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Microleakage Analysis of Different Bulk-Filling Techniques for Class II Restorations: µ-CT, SEM and EDS Evaluations
por: Tosco, Vincenzo, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Microtensile bond strength of bulk-fill restorative composites to dentin
por: Mandava, Jyothi, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Margin Integrity of Bulk-Fill Composite Restorations in Primary Teeth
por: Paganini, Alina, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Low- and high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites: a comparison of microhardness, microtensile bond strength, and fracture strength in restored molars
por: França, Fabiana MG, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Clinical performance of class I cavities restored with bulk fill composite at a 1-year follow-up using the FDI criteria: a randomized clinical trial
por: Suneelkumar, Chinni, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Hardness and Depth of Cure of Conventional and Bulk-Fill Composite Resins in Class II Restorations with Transparent and Metal Matrix Strips
por: Musavinasab, Seyed Mostafa, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Shear bond strength of bulk-fill and nano-restorative materials to dentin
por: Colak, Hakan, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Bulk-fill restorative composites under simulated carious and erosive conditions
por: Zenkner-Neto, Alfredo W, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

One-Year Clinical Performance of Activa™ Bioactive-Restorative Composite in Primary Molars
por: Lardani, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cuspal Deflection and Temperature Rise of MOD Cavities Restored through the Bulk-Fill and Incremental Layering Techniques Using Flowable and Packable Bulk-Fill Composites
por: Santis, Roberto De, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Bulk-Fill Restorative Materials in Primary Tooth: An Intrapulpal Temperature Changes Study
por: Altan, Halenur, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Development and characterization of a novel bulk-fill elastomeric temporary restorative composite
por: Peralta, Sonia Luque, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The Depth of Cure, Sorption and Solubility of Dual-Cured Bulk-Fill Restorative Materials
por: Alzahrani, Bashayer, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The clinical performance of bulk-fill versus the incremental layered application of direct resin composite restorations: a systematic review
por: Sengupta, Arjita, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparison between Different Bulk-Fill and Incremental Composite Materials Used for Class II Restorations in Primary and Permanent Teeth: In Vitro Assessments
por: Ibrahim, Maria Salem, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

12-months Clinical Evaluation of Fiber Reinforced Bulk Fill Resin Composite versus Incremental Packing of Nanohybrid Resin Composite in Restoration of Deep Proximal Lesions of Permanent Molars: A Randomized Controlled Trial
por: Salem, Mennatallah N., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Push-Out Bond Strength of Restorations with Bulk-Fill, Flow, and Conventional Resin Composites
por: Caixeta, Rodrigo Vieira, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Erratum: Bulk-Fill Restorative Materials in Primary Tooth: An Intrapulpal Temperature Changes Study
Publicado: (2018)

Comparative Evaluation of Postoperative Sensitivity in Bulk Fill Restoratives: A Randomized Controlled Trial
por: Hirani, Riddhi Thakarshibhai, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Comparative Assessment of Cuspal Deflection in Premolars Restored with Bulk-Fill and Conventional Composite Resins
por: Yarmohammadi, Ebrahim, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Comparison of marginal adaptation of Class II cavities restored with bulk-fill and conventional composite resins using different universal bonding agent application strategies
por: Kimyai, Soodabeh, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Microleakage in class II restorations of two bulk fill resin composites and a conventional nanohybrid resin composite: an in vitro study at 10,000 thermocycles
por: Cayo-Rojas, César F., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_h8cv336sjeo83g949ls8s9gd0r