Cargando…

Comparison Between Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy and Nasogastric Feeding in 160 Patients with Swallowing Disturbances: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study

PURPOSE: We retrospectively compared the complications, blood biochemical indexes and outcomes in patients with swallowing disturbances receiving nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding and percutaneous endoscopy gastrostomy (PEG). METHODS: Among 160 patients, 72 cases received PEG and 88 cases received NGT....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Du, Ge, Liu, Fangfang, Ma, Xiaomin, Chen, Shanshan, Dai, Min, Wei, Li, Liu, Zishuang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506851
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S389891
_version_ 1784846378036363264
author Du, Ge
Liu, Fangfang
Ma, Xiaomin
Chen, Shanshan
Dai, Min
Wei, Li
Liu, Zishuang
author_facet Du, Ge
Liu, Fangfang
Ma, Xiaomin
Chen, Shanshan
Dai, Min
Wei, Li
Liu, Zishuang
author_sort Du, Ge
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We retrospectively compared the complications, blood biochemical indexes and outcomes in patients with swallowing disturbances receiving nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding and percutaneous endoscopy gastrostomy (PEG). METHODS: Among 160 patients, 72 cases received PEG and 88 cases received NGT. All patients were followed up for two years. We collected their clinical data from the medical records. Indicators, such as body mass index (BMI), white blood cell (WBC), hemoglobin (HGB), complications, including recurrent aspiration pneumonia, gastrointestinal bleeding, reflux esophagitis, and outcomes (survival or death) were compared between the two groups semi-annually. RESULTS: SAt both six months and one year after receiving treatment, there was no statistical difference between the two groups in indicators, complications and outcomes, with all P >0.05. It can be seen that, when the patients were followed up for one and a half years18 months, ALB was lower in the NGT group (33.81±0.46) compared with the PEG group (36.14±0.50) (P <0.05). After two years of follow-up, differences between the NGT and PEG group could be seen in a variety of indicators, including BMI (20.08±0.27 vs 21.03±0.25), WBC (9.12±0.56 vs 7.08±0.29), ALB (33.11±0.43 vs 35.75±0.49), creatinine (55.07±1.83 vs 63.21±2.94), and the complications, such as aspiration pneumonia, gastrointestinal bleeding, reflux esophagitis, and electrolyte disorder, in the PEG group were significantly reduced compared to the NGT groupthan that in its counterpart, P <0.05. In the two-year follow-up period, there were 13 and 22 patients died in the PEG group and NGT group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both techniques are safe and effective in the short term. However, on a longer-term basis, PEG is shown to be superior to NGT feeding in improving nutrition and preventing common complications for patients with swallowing disturbances.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9733445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97334452022-12-10 Comparison Between Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy and Nasogastric Feeding in 160 Patients with Swallowing Disturbances: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study Du, Ge Liu, Fangfang Ma, Xiaomin Chen, Shanshan Dai, Min Wei, Li Liu, Zishuang Clin Interv Aging Original Research PURPOSE: We retrospectively compared the complications, blood biochemical indexes and outcomes in patients with swallowing disturbances receiving nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding and percutaneous endoscopy gastrostomy (PEG). METHODS: Among 160 patients, 72 cases received PEG and 88 cases received NGT. All patients were followed up for two years. We collected their clinical data from the medical records. Indicators, such as body mass index (BMI), white blood cell (WBC), hemoglobin (HGB), complications, including recurrent aspiration pneumonia, gastrointestinal bleeding, reflux esophagitis, and outcomes (survival or death) were compared between the two groups semi-annually. RESULTS: SAt both six months and one year after receiving treatment, there was no statistical difference between the two groups in indicators, complications and outcomes, with all P >0.05. It can be seen that, when the patients were followed up for one and a half years18 months, ALB was lower in the NGT group (33.81±0.46) compared with the PEG group (36.14±0.50) (P <0.05). After two years of follow-up, differences between the NGT and PEG group could be seen in a variety of indicators, including BMI (20.08±0.27 vs 21.03±0.25), WBC (9.12±0.56 vs 7.08±0.29), ALB (33.11±0.43 vs 35.75±0.49), creatinine (55.07±1.83 vs 63.21±2.94), and the complications, such as aspiration pneumonia, gastrointestinal bleeding, reflux esophagitis, and electrolyte disorder, in the PEG group were significantly reduced compared to the NGT groupthan that in its counterpart, P <0.05. In the two-year follow-up period, there were 13 and 22 patients died in the PEG group and NGT group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both techniques are safe and effective in the short term. However, on a longer-term basis, PEG is shown to be superior to NGT feeding in improving nutrition and preventing common complications for patients with swallowing disturbances. Dove 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9733445/ /pubmed/36506851 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S389891 Text en © 2022 Du et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Du, Ge
Liu, Fangfang
Ma, Xiaomin
Chen, Shanshan
Dai, Min
Wei, Li
Liu, Zishuang
Comparison Between Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy and Nasogastric Feeding in 160 Patients with Swallowing Disturbances: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study
title Comparison Between Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy and Nasogastric Feeding in 160 Patients with Swallowing Disturbances: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study
title_full Comparison Between Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy and Nasogastric Feeding in 160 Patients with Swallowing Disturbances: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study
title_fullStr Comparison Between Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy and Nasogastric Feeding in 160 Patients with Swallowing Disturbances: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison Between Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy and Nasogastric Feeding in 160 Patients with Swallowing Disturbances: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study
title_short Comparison Between Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy and Nasogastric Feeding in 160 Patients with Swallowing Disturbances: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study
title_sort comparison between percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nasogastric feeding in 160 patients with swallowing disturbances: a two-year follow-up study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506851
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S389891
work_keys_str_mv AT duge comparisonbetweenpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyandnasogastricfeedingin160patientswithswallowingdisturbancesatwoyearfollowupstudy
AT liufangfang comparisonbetweenpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyandnasogastricfeedingin160patientswithswallowingdisturbancesatwoyearfollowupstudy
AT maxiaomin comparisonbetweenpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyandnasogastricfeedingin160patientswithswallowingdisturbancesatwoyearfollowupstudy
AT chenshanshan comparisonbetweenpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyandnasogastricfeedingin160patientswithswallowingdisturbancesatwoyearfollowupstudy
AT daimin comparisonbetweenpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyandnasogastricfeedingin160patientswithswallowingdisturbancesatwoyearfollowupstudy
AT weili comparisonbetweenpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyandnasogastricfeedingin160patientswithswallowingdisturbancesatwoyearfollowupstudy
AT liuzishuang comparisonbetweenpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyandnasogastricfeedingin160patientswithswallowingdisturbancesatwoyearfollowupstudy