Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars reinforced by customized glass fiber post in two different ways: An in vitro study
CONTEXT: Endodontically treated premolars are currently restored with direct bonded techniques in conservative manner enabling them to bear functional stresses homogeneously. AIM: The study aimed to evaluate the effect of placement of compactable glass fibers in reinforcing the endodontically treate...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733547/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506618 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_270_22 |
_version_ | 1784846400009273344 |
---|---|
author | Chhabra, Naveen Desai, Krupa Singbal, Kiran Prabhakar |
author_facet | Chhabra, Naveen Desai, Krupa Singbal, Kiran Prabhakar |
author_sort | Chhabra, Naveen |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: Endodontically treated premolars are currently restored with direct bonded techniques in conservative manner enabling them to bear functional stresses homogeneously. AIM: The study aimed to evaluate the effect of placement of compactable glass fibers in reinforcing the endodontically treated teeth in a novel conservative manner. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Research laboratory, in vitro study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-five extracted maxillary premolars were procured. Fifteen teeth were left untreated (Group A) and the remaining teeth were endodontically treated followed by standardized mesio-occluso-distal preparation and randomly assigned to experimental groups (n = 15) as follows: (B) no restoration, (C) restoration with composite, (D) EverStick(®) POST followed by composite, and (E) vertical glass fibers within 3 mm of the coronal root canal space and buccopalatal flaring of the coronal fibers followed by composite. After conditioning and thermocycling, specimens were loaded under a universal testing machine to evaluate fracture resistance and fracture pattern of specimens. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Obtained scores were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance test for stress analysis, post hoc Tukey's test for intergroup comparison, and Chi-square test for analysis of favorable and unfavorable fracture. RESULTS: The fracture resistance was highest to lowest as follows: Group A > E > C > D > B (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: EverStick(®)POST used in conservative manner improved fracture strength of teeth significantly. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9733547 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97335472022-12-10 Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars reinforced by customized glass fiber post in two different ways: An in vitro study Chhabra, Naveen Desai, Krupa Singbal, Kiran Prabhakar J Conserv Dent Original Article CONTEXT: Endodontically treated premolars are currently restored with direct bonded techniques in conservative manner enabling them to bear functional stresses homogeneously. AIM: The study aimed to evaluate the effect of placement of compactable glass fibers in reinforcing the endodontically treated teeth in a novel conservative manner. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Research laboratory, in vitro study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-five extracted maxillary premolars were procured. Fifteen teeth were left untreated (Group A) and the remaining teeth were endodontically treated followed by standardized mesio-occluso-distal preparation and randomly assigned to experimental groups (n = 15) as follows: (B) no restoration, (C) restoration with composite, (D) EverStick(®) POST followed by composite, and (E) vertical glass fibers within 3 mm of the coronal root canal space and buccopalatal flaring of the coronal fibers followed by composite. After conditioning and thermocycling, specimens were loaded under a universal testing machine to evaluate fracture resistance and fracture pattern of specimens. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Obtained scores were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance test for stress analysis, post hoc Tukey's test for intergroup comparison, and Chi-square test for analysis of favorable and unfavorable fracture. RESULTS: The fracture resistance was highest to lowest as follows: Group A > E > C > D > B (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: EverStick(®)POST used in conservative manner improved fracture strength of teeth significantly. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9733547/ /pubmed/36506618 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_270_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chhabra, Naveen Desai, Krupa Singbal, Kiran Prabhakar Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars reinforced by customized glass fiber post in two different ways: An in vitro study |
title | Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars reinforced by customized glass fiber post in two different ways: An in vitro study |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars reinforced by customized glass fiber post in two different ways: An in vitro study |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars reinforced by customized glass fiber post in two different ways: An in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars reinforced by customized glass fiber post in two different ways: An in vitro study |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars reinforced by customized glass fiber post in two different ways: An in vitro study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars reinforced by customized glass fiber post in two different ways: an in vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733547/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506618 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_270_22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chhabranaveen comparativeevaluationoffractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedmaxillarypremolarsreinforcedbycustomizedglassfiberpostintwodifferentwaysaninvitrostudy AT desaikrupa comparativeevaluationoffractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedmaxillarypremolarsreinforcedbycustomizedglassfiberpostintwodifferentwaysaninvitrostudy AT singbalkiranprabhakar comparativeevaluationoffractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedmaxillarypremolarsreinforcedbycustomizedglassfiberpostintwodifferentwaysaninvitrostudy |