Cargando…

The host niches of soybean rather than genetic modification or glyphosate application drive the assembly of root‐associated microbial communities

Plant roots significantly influence soil microbial diversity, and soil microorganisms play significant roles in both natural and agricultural ecosystems. Although the genetically modified (GM) crops with enhanced insect and herbicide resistance are thought to have unmatched yield and stress resistan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Minkai, Luo, Fuhe, Song, Yuchen, Ma, Shenglin, Ma, Yudi, Fazal, Aliya, Yin, Tongming, Lu, Guihua, Sun, Shucun, Qi, Jinliang, Wen, Zhongling, Li, Yongchun, Yang, Yonghua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36336802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.14164
_version_ 1784846420150321152
author Yang, Minkai
Luo, Fuhe
Song, Yuchen
Ma, Shenglin
Ma, Yudi
Fazal, Aliya
Yin, Tongming
Lu, Guihua
Sun, Shucun
Qi, Jinliang
Wen, Zhongling
Li, Yongchun
Yang, Yonghua
author_facet Yang, Minkai
Luo, Fuhe
Song, Yuchen
Ma, Shenglin
Ma, Yudi
Fazal, Aliya
Yin, Tongming
Lu, Guihua
Sun, Shucun
Qi, Jinliang
Wen, Zhongling
Li, Yongchun
Yang, Yonghua
author_sort Yang, Minkai
collection PubMed
description Plant roots significantly influence soil microbial diversity, and soil microorganisms play significant roles in both natural and agricultural ecosystems. Although the genetically modified (GM) crops with enhanced insect and herbicide resistance are thought to have unmatched yield and stress resistance advantages, thorough and in‐depth case studies still need to be carried out in a real‐world setting due to the potential effects of GM plants on soil microbial communities. In this study, three treatments were used: a recipient soybean variety Jack, a triple transgenic soybean line JD321, and the glyphosate‐treated JD321 (JD321G). Three sampling stages (flowering, seed filling and maturing), as well as three host niches of soybean rhizosphere [intact roots (RT), rhizospheric soil (RS) and surrounding soil (SS)] were established. In comparison to Jack, the rhizospheric soil of JD321G had higher urease activity and lower nitrite reductase at the flowering stage. Different treatments and different sampling stages existed no significant effects on the compositions of microbial communities at different taxonomic levels. However, at the genus level, the relative abundance of three plant growth‐promoting fungal genera (i.e. Mortierella, Chaetomium and Pseudombrophila) increased while endophytic bacteria Chryseobacterium and pathogenic bacteria Streptomyces decreased from the inside to the outside of the roots (i.e. RT → RS → SS). Moreover, two bacterial genera, Bradyrhizobium and Ensifer were more abundant in RT than in RS and SS, as well as three species, Agrobacterium radiobacter, Ensifer fredii and Ensifer meliloti, which are closely related to nitrogen‐fixation. Furthermore, five clusters of orthologous groups (COGs) associated to nitrogen‐fixation genes were higher in RT than in RS, whereas only one COG annotated as dinitrogenase iron‐molybdenum cofactor biosynthesis protein was lower. Overall, the results imply that the rhizosphere host niches throughout the soil–plant continuum largely control the composition and function of the root‐associated microbiome of triple transgenic soybean.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9733649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97336492022-12-12 The host niches of soybean rather than genetic modification or glyphosate application drive the assembly of root‐associated microbial communities Yang, Minkai Luo, Fuhe Song, Yuchen Ma, Shenglin Ma, Yudi Fazal, Aliya Yin, Tongming Lu, Guihua Sun, Shucun Qi, Jinliang Wen, Zhongling Li, Yongchun Yang, Yonghua Microb Biotechnol Research Articles Plant roots significantly influence soil microbial diversity, and soil microorganisms play significant roles in both natural and agricultural ecosystems. Although the genetically modified (GM) crops with enhanced insect and herbicide resistance are thought to have unmatched yield and stress resistance advantages, thorough and in‐depth case studies still need to be carried out in a real‐world setting due to the potential effects of GM plants on soil microbial communities. In this study, three treatments were used: a recipient soybean variety Jack, a triple transgenic soybean line JD321, and the glyphosate‐treated JD321 (JD321G). Three sampling stages (flowering, seed filling and maturing), as well as three host niches of soybean rhizosphere [intact roots (RT), rhizospheric soil (RS) and surrounding soil (SS)] were established. In comparison to Jack, the rhizospheric soil of JD321G had higher urease activity and lower nitrite reductase at the flowering stage. Different treatments and different sampling stages existed no significant effects on the compositions of microbial communities at different taxonomic levels. However, at the genus level, the relative abundance of three plant growth‐promoting fungal genera (i.e. Mortierella, Chaetomium and Pseudombrophila) increased while endophytic bacteria Chryseobacterium and pathogenic bacteria Streptomyces decreased from the inside to the outside of the roots (i.e. RT → RS → SS). Moreover, two bacterial genera, Bradyrhizobium and Ensifer were more abundant in RT than in RS and SS, as well as three species, Agrobacterium radiobacter, Ensifer fredii and Ensifer meliloti, which are closely related to nitrogen‐fixation. Furthermore, five clusters of orthologous groups (COGs) associated to nitrogen‐fixation genes were higher in RT than in RS, whereas only one COG annotated as dinitrogenase iron‐molybdenum cofactor biosynthesis protein was lower. Overall, the results imply that the rhizosphere host niches throughout the soil–plant continuum largely control the composition and function of the root‐associated microbiome of triple transgenic soybean. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9733649/ /pubmed/36336802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.14164 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Microbial Biotechnology published by Applied Microbiology International and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Yang, Minkai
Luo, Fuhe
Song, Yuchen
Ma, Shenglin
Ma, Yudi
Fazal, Aliya
Yin, Tongming
Lu, Guihua
Sun, Shucun
Qi, Jinliang
Wen, Zhongling
Li, Yongchun
Yang, Yonghua
The host niches of soybean rather than genetic modification or glyphosate application drive the assembly of root‐associated microbial communities
title The host niches of soybean rather than genetic modification or glyphosate application drive the assembly of root‐associated microbial communities
title_full The host niches of soybean rather than genetic modification or glyphosate application drive the assembly of root‐associated microbial communities
title_fullStr The host niches of soybean rather than genetic modification or glyphosate application drive the assembly of root‐associated microbial communities
title_full_unstemmed The host niches of soybean rather than genetic modification or glyphosate application drive the assembly of root‐associated microbial communities
title_short The host niches of soybean rather than genetic modification or glyphosate application drive the assembly of root‐associated microbial communities
title_sort host niches of soybean rather than genetic modification or glyphosate application drive the assembly of root‐associated microbial communities
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36336802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.14164
work_keys_str_mv AT yangminkai thehostnichesofsoybeanratherthangeneticmodificationorglyphosateapplicationdrivetheassemblyofrootassociatedmicrobialcommunities
AT luofuhe thehostnichesofsoybeanratherthangeneticmodificationorglyphosateapplicationdrivetheassemblyofrootassociatedmicrobialcommunities
AT songyuchen thehostnichesofsoybeanratherthangeneticmodificationorglyphosateapplicationdrivetheassemblyofrootassociatedmicrobialcommunities
AT mashenglin thehostnichesofsoybeanratherthangeneticmodificationorglyphosateapplicationdrivetheassemblyofrootassociatedmicrobialcommunities
AT mayudi thehostnichesofsoybeanratherthangeneticmodificationorglyphosateapplicationdrivetheassemblyofrootassociatedmicrobialcommunities
AT fazalaliya thehostnichesofsoybeanratherthangeneticmodificationorglyphosateapplicationdrivetheassemblyofrootassociatedmicrobialcommunities
AT yintongming thehostnichesofsoybeanratherthangeneticmodificationorglyphosateapplicationdrivetheassemblyofrootassociatedmicrobialcommunities
AT luguihua thehostnichesofsoybeanratherthangeneticmodificationorglyphosateapplicationdrivetheassemblyofrootassociatedmicrobialcommunities
AT sunshucun thehostnichesofsoybeanratherthangeneticmodificationorglyphosateapplicationdrivetheassemblyofrootassociatedmicrobialcommunities
AT qijinliang thehostnichesofsoybeanratherthangeneticmodificationorglyphosateapplicationdrivetheassemblyofrootassociatedmicrobialcommunities
AT wenzhongling thehostnichesofsoybeanratherthangeneticmodificationorglyphosateapplicationdrivetheassemblyofrootassociatedmicrobialcommunities
AT liyongchun thehostnichesofsoybeanratherthangeneticmodificationorglyphosateapplicationdrivetheassemblyofrootassociatedmicrobialcommunities
AT yangyonghua thehostnichesofsoybeanratherthangeneticmodificationorglyphosateapplicationdrivetheassemblyofrootassociatedmicrobialcommunities
AT yangminkai hostnichesofsoybeanratherthangeneticmodificationorglyphosateapplicationdrivetheassemblyofrootassociatedmicrobialcommunities
AT luofuhe hostnichesofsoybeanratherthangeneticmodificationorglyphosateapplicationdrivetheassemblyofrootassociatedmicrobialcommunities
AT songyuchen hostnichesofsoybeanratherthangeneticmodificationorglyphosateapplicationdrivetheassemblyofrootassociatedmicrobialcommunities
AT mashenglin hostnichesofsoybeanratherthangeneticmodificationorglyphosateapplicationdrivetheassemblyofrootassociatedmicrobialcommunities
AT mayudi hostnichesofsoybeanratherthangeneticmodificationorglyphosateapplicationdrivetheassemblyofrootassociatedmicrobialcommunities
AT fazalaliya hostnichesofsoybeanratherthangeneticmodificationorglyphosateapplicationdrivetheassemblyofrootassociatedmicrobialcommunities
AT yintongming hostnichesofsoybeanratherthangeneticmodificationorglyphosateapplicationdrivetheassemblyofrootassociatedmicrobialcommunities
AT luguihua hostnichesofsoybeanratherthangeneticmodificationorglyphosateapplicationdrivetheassemblyofrootassociatedmicrobialcommunities
AT sunshucun hostnichesofsoybeanratherthangeneticmodificationorglyphosateapplicationdrivetheassemblyofrootassociatedmicrobialcommunities
AT qijinliang hostnichesofsoybeanratherthangeneticmodificationorglyphosateapplicationdrivetheassemblyofrootassociatedmicrobialcommunities
AT wenzhongling hostnichesofsoybeanratherthangeneticmodificationorglyphosateapplicationdrivetheassemblyofrootassociatedmicrobialcommunities
AT liyongchun hostnichesofsoybeanratherthangeneticmodificationorglyphosateapplicationdrivetheassemblyofrootassociatedmicrobialcommunities
AT yangyonghua hostnichesofsoybeanratherthangeneticmodificationorglyphosateapplicationdrivetheassemblyofrootassociatedmicrobialcommunities