Cargando…

What Is the Best Candidate to Replace the Tarsus? A Biomechanical, Histological, and Optical Study Comparing Five Grafts

PURPOSE: Reconstruction of the posterior lamella after eyelid tumor removal is challenging and not consensual. Tarsus is the most suitable graft, but is only available in small amounts. Herein, we aim to determine the most appropriate way to replace the tarsus by comparing the biomechanical, histolo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martini, Ken, Schaub, Sebastien, Bertoloto, Corine, Baillif, Stephanie, Lassalle, Sandra, Martel, Paul, Martel, Arnaud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36472880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.12.6
_version_ 1784846420633714688
author Martini, Ken
Schaub, Sebastien
Bertoloto, Corine
Baillif, Stephanie
Lassalle, Sandra
Martel, Paul
Martel, Arnaud
author_facet Martini, Ken
Schaub, Sebastien
Bertoloto, Corine
Baillif, Stephanie
Lassalle, Sandra
Martel, Paul
Martel, Arnaud
author_sort Martini, Ken
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Reconstruction of the posterior lamella after eyelid tumor removal is challenging and not consensual. Tarsus is the most suitable graft, but is only available in small amounts. Herein, we aim to determine the most appropriate way to replace the tarsus by comparing the biomechanical, histological, and optical properties of five commonly used grafts. METHODS: This study was conducted at the University hospital of Nice between June 2019 and June 2020. Five posterior lamella grafts (tarsus, conchal cartilage, sclera, hard palate, and dermis) were harvested in five fresh frozen cadavers. Biomechanical properties were assessed by tractometry. Collagen and elastin fibers were analyzed by using histological analysis and optical characterization with the second harmonic generation imaging. RESULTS: The mean Young's modulus was 8.92 MPa (range, 2.90–22.90 MPa), 1.05 MPa (range, 0.39–1.76 MPa), 8.72 MPa (range, 2.0–23.50 MPa), 2.57 MPa (range, 0.41–4.35 MPa), and 1.44 MPa (range, 0.71–2.30 MPa) for the tarsus, the conchal cartilage, the sclera, the hard palate mucosa, and the dermis, respectively. The mean tensile strength was 3 MPa (range, 1.70–6.88 MPa), 0.54 MPa (range, 0.13–0.79 MPa), 2.87 MPa (range, 1.23–5.40 MPa), 1.4 MPa (range, 0.21–2.40 MPa) and 1.0 MPa (range, 0.46–1.43 MPa) for the tarsus, the conchal cartilage, the sclera, the hard palate mucosa, and the dermis, respectively. Hard palate mucosa was the closest to the tarsus regarding the ratio of elastin and collagen fibers. The average second harmonic generation intensity was 221 arbitrary units (a.u.) (range, 165–362 a.u.), 182 a.u. (range, 35–259 a.u.), 369 a.u. (range, 206–533 a.u.), 108 a.u. (range, 34–208 a.u.), and 244 a.u. (range, 195–388 a.u.) for the tarsus, the conchal cartilage, the sclera, the hard palate mucosa, and the dermis, respectively. The hard palate mucosa and the dermis were the closest to the tarsus regarding the collagen fiber size and orientation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: By attributing 2 points for each characteristic (biomechanical, histological, and optical), the hard palate mucosa and the sclera seem to be the most suitable grafts to replace the tarsus. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The aim of this article was to assess the biomechanical, histological and optical characteristics of five of the most commonly used tarsal grafts; this may be helpful in decisions for clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9733651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97336512022-12-10 What Is the Best Candidate to Replace the Tarsus? A Biomechanical, Histological, and Optical Study Comparing Five Grafts Martini, Ken Schaub, Sebastien Bertoloto, Corine Baillif, Stephanie Lassalle, Sandra Martel, Paul Martel, Arnaud Transl Vis Sci Technol Lacrimal Apparatus, Eyelids, Orbit PURPOSE: Reconstruction of the posterior lamella after eyelid tumor removal is challenging and not consensual. Tarsus is the most suitable graft, but is only available in small amounts. Herein, we aim to determine the most appropriate way to replace the tarsus by comparing the biomechanical, histological, and optical properties of five commonly used grafts. METHODS: This study was conducted at the University hospital of Nice between June 2019 and June 2020. Five posterior lamella grafts (tarsus, conchal cartilage, sclera, hard palate, and dermis) were harvested in five fresh frozen cadavers. Biomechanical properties were assessed by tractometry. Collagen and elastin fibers were analyzed by using histological analysis and optical characterization with the second harmonic generation imaging. RESULTS: The mean Young's modulus was 8.92 MPa (range, 2.90–22.90 MPa), 1.05 MPa (range, 0.39–1.76 MPa), 8.72 MPa (range, 2.0–23.50 MPa), 2.57 MPa (range, 0.41–4.35 MPa), and 1.44 MPa (range, 0.71–2.30 MPa) for the tarsus, the conchal cartilage, the sclera, the hard palate mucosa, and the dermis, respectively. The mean tensile strength was 3 MPa (range, 1.70–6.88 MPa), 0.54 MPa (range, 0.13–0.79 MPa), 2.87 MPa (range, 1.23–5.40 MPa), 1.4 MPa (range, 0.21–2.40 MPa) and 1.0 MPa (range, 0.46–1.43 MPa) for the tarsus, the conchal cartilage, the sclera, the hard palate mucosa, and the dermis, respectively. Hard palate mucosa was the closest to the tarsus regarding the ratio of elastin and collagen fibers. The average second harmonic generation intensity was 221 arbitrary units (a.u.) (range, 165–362 a.u.), 182 a.u. (range, 35–259 a.u.), 369 a.u. (range, 206–533 a.u.), 108 a.u. (range, 34–208 a.u.), and 244 a.u. (range, 195–388 a.u.) for the tarsus, the conchal cartilage, the sclera, the hard palate mucosa, and the dermis, respectively. The hard palate mucosa and the dermis were the closest to the tarsus regarding the collagen fiber size and orientation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: By attributing 2 points for each characteristic (biomechanical, histological, and optical), the hard palate mucosa and the sclera seem to be the most suitable grafts to replace the tarsus. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The aim of this article was to assess the biomechanical, histological and optical characteristics of five of the most commonly used tarsal grafts; this may be helpful in decisions for clinical practice. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9733651/ /pubmed/36472880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.12.6 Text en Copyright 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Lacrimal Apparatus, Eyelids, Orbit
Martini, Ken
Schaub, Sebastien
Bertoloto, Corine
Baillif, Stephanie
Lassalle, Sandra
Martel, Paul
Martel, Arnaud
What Is the Best Candidate to Replace the Tarsus? A Biomechanical, Histological, and Optical Study Comparing Five Grafts
title What Is the Best Candidate to Replace the Tarsus? A Biomechanical, Histological, and Optical Study Comparing Five Grafts
title_full What Is the Best Candidate to Replace the Tarsus? A Biomechanical, Histological, and Optical Study Comparing Five Grafts
title_fullStr What Is the Best Candidate to Replace the Tarsus? A Biomechanical, Histological, and Optical Study Comparing Five Grafts
title_full_unstemmed What Is the Best Candidate to Replace the Tarsus? A Biomechanical, Histological, and Optical Study Comparing Five Grafts
title_short What Is the Best Candidate to Replace the Tarsus? A Biomechanical, Histological, and Optical Study Comparing Five Grafts
title_sort what is the best candidate to replace the tarsus? a biomechanical, histological, and optical study comparing five grafts
topic Lacrimal Apparatus, Eyelids, Orbit
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36472880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.12.6
work_keys_str_mv AT martiniken whatisthebestcandidatetoreplacethetarsusabiomechanicalhistologicalandopticalstudycomparingfivegrafts
AT schaubsebastien whatisthebestcandidatetoreplacethetarsusabiomechanicalhistologicalandopticalstudycomparingfivegrafts
AT bertolotocorine whatisthebestcandidatetoreplacethetarsusabiomechanicalhistologicalandopticalstudycomparingfivegrafts
AT baillifstephanie whatisthebestcandidatetoreplacethetarsusabiomechanicalhistologicalandopticalstudycomparingfivegrafts
AT lassallesandra whatisthebestcandidatetoreplacethetarsusabiomechanicalhistologicalandopticalstudycomparingfivegrafts
AT martelpaul whatisthebestcandidatetoreplacethetarsusabiomechanicalhistologicalandopticalstudycomparingfivegrafts
AT martelarnaud whatisthebestcandidatetoreplacethetarsusabiomechanicalhistologicalandopticalstudycomparingfivegrafts