Cargando…
What Is the Best Candidate to Replace the Tarsus? A Biomechanical, Histological, and Optical Study Comparing Five Grafts
PURPOSE: Reconstruction of the posterior lamella after eyelid tumor removal is challenging and not consensual. Tarsus is the most suitable graft, but is only available in small amounts. Herein, we aim to determine the most appropriate way to replace the tarsus by comparing the biomechanical, histolo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36472880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.12.6 |
_version_ | 1784846420633714688 |
---|---|
author | Martini, Ken Schaub, Sebastien Bertoloto, Corine Baillif, Stephanie Lassalle, Sandra Martel, Paul Martel, Arnaud |
author_facet | Martini, Ken Schaub, Sebastien Bertoloto, Corine Baillif, Stephanie Lassalle, Sandra Martel, Paul Martel, Arnaud |
author_sort | Martini, Ken |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Reconstruction of the posterior lamella after eyelid tumor removal is challenging and not consensual. Tarsus is the most suitable graft, but is only available in small amounts. Herein, we aim to determine the most appropriate way to replace the tarsus by comparing the biomechanical, histological, and optical properties of five commonly used grafts. METHODS: This study was conducted at the University hospital of Nice between June 2019 and June 2020. Five posterior lamella grafts (tarsus, conchal cartilage, sclera, hard palate, and dermis) were harvested in five fresh frozen cadavers. Biomechanical properties were assessed by tractometry. Collagen and elastin fibers were analyzed by using histological analysis and optical characterization with the second harmonic generation imaging. RESULTS: The mean Young's modulus was 8.92 MPa (range, 2.90–22.90 MPa), 1.05 MPa (range, 0.39–1.76 MPa), 8.72 MPa (range, 2.0–23.50 MPa), 2.57 MPa (range, 0.41–4.35 MPa), and 1.44 MPa (range, 0.71–2.30 MPa) for the tarsus, the conchal cartilage, the sclera, the hard palate mucosa, and the dermis, respectively. The mean tensile strength was 3 MPa (range, 1.70–6.88 MPa), 0.54 MPa (range, 0.13–0.79 MPa), 2.87 MPa (range, 1.23–5.40 MPa), 1.4 MPa (range, 0.21–2.40 MPa) and 1.0 MPa (range, 0.46–1.43 MPa) for the tarsus, the conchal cartilage, the sclera, the hard palate mucosa, and the dermis, respectively. Hard palate mucosa was the closest to the tarsus regarding the ratio of elastin and collagen fibers. The average second harmonic generation intensity was 221 arbitrary units (a.u.) (range, 165–362 a.u.), 182 a.u. (range, 35–259 a.u.), 369 a.u. (range, 206–533 a.u.), 108 a.u. (range, 34–208 a.u.), and 244 a.u. (range, 195–388 a.u.) for the tarsus, the conchal cartilage, the sclera, the hard palate mucosa, and the dermis, respectively. The hard palate mucosa and the dermis were the closest to the tarsus regarding the collagen fiber size and orientation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: By attributing 2 points for each characteristic (biomechanical, histological, and optical), the hard palate mucosa and the sclera seem to be the most suitable grafts to replace the tarsus. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The aim of this article was to assess the biomechanical, histological and optical characteristics of five of the most commonly used tarsal grafts; this may be helpful in decisions for clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9733651 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97336512022-12-10 What Is the Best Candidate to Replace the Tarsus? A Biomechanical, Histological, and Optical Study Comparing Five Grafts Martini, Ken Schaub, Sebastien Bertoloto, Corine Baillif, Stephanie Lassalle, Sandra Martel, Paul Martel, Arnaud Transl Vis Sci Technol Lacrimal Apparatus, Eyelids, Orbit PURPOSE: Reconstruction of the posterior lamella after eyelid tumor removal is challenging and not consensual. Tarsus is the most suitable graft, but is only available in small amounts. Herein, we aim to determine the most appropriate way to replace the tarsus by comparing the biomechanical, histological, and optical properties of five commonly used grafts. METHODS: This study was conducted at the University hospital of Nice between June 2019 and June 2020. Five posterior lamella grafts (tarsus, conchal cartilage, sclera, hard palate, and dermis) were harvested in five fresh frozen cadavers. Biomechanical properties were assessed by tractometry. Collagen and elastin fibers were analyzed by using histological analysis and optical characterization with the second harmonic generation imaging. RESULTS: The mean Young's modulus was 8.92 MPa (range, 2.90–22.90 MPa), 1.05 MPa (range, 0.39–1.76 MPa), 8.72 MPa (range, 2.0–23.50 MPa), 2.57 MPa (range, 0.41–4.35 MPa), and 1.44 MPa (range, 0.71–2.30 MPa) for the tarsus, the conchal cartilage, the sclera, the hard palate mucosa, and the dermis, respectively. The mean tensile strength was 3 MPa (range, 1.70–6.88 MPa), 0.54 MPa (range, 0.13–0.79 MPa), 2.87 MPa (range, 1.23–5.40 MPa), 1.4 MPa (range, 0.21–2.40 MPa) and 1.0 MPa (range, 0.46–1.43 MPa) for the tarsus, the conchal cartilage, the sclera, the hard palate mucosa, and the dermis, respectively. Hard palate mucosa was the closest to the tarsus regarding the ratio of elastin and collagen fibers. The average second harmonic generation intensity was 221 arbitrary units (a.u.) (range, 165–362 a.u.), 182 a.u. (range, 35–259 a.u.), 369 a.u. (range, 206–533 a.u.), 108 a.u. (range, 34–208 a.u.), and 244 a.u. (range, 195–388 a.u.) for the tarsus, the conchal cartilage, the sclera, the hard palate mucosa, and the dermis, respectively. The hard palate mucosa and the dermis were the closest to the tarsus regarding the collagen fiber size and orientation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: By attributing 2 points for each characteristic (biomechanical, histological, and optical), the hard palate mucosa and the sclera seem to be the most suitable grafts to replace the tarsus. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The aim of this article was to assess the biomechanical, histological and optical characteristics of five of the most commonly used tarsal grafts; this may be helpful in decisions for clinical practice. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9733651/ /pubmed/36472880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.12.6 Text en Copyright 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Lacrimal Apparatus, Eyelids, Orbit Martini, Ken Schaub, Sebastien Bertoloto, Corine Baillif, Stephanie Lassalle, Sandra Martel, Paul Martel, Arnaud What Is the Best Candidate to Replace the Tarsus? A Biomechanical, Histological, and Optical Study Comparing Five Grafts |
title | What Is the Best Candidate to Replace the Tarsus? A Biomechanical, Histological, and Optical Study Comparing Five Grafts |
title_full | What Is the Best Candidate to Replace the Tarsus? A Biomechanical, Histological, and Optical Study Comparing Five Grafts |
title_fullStr | What Is the Best Candidate to Replace the Tarsus? A Biomechanical, Histological, and Optical Study Comparing Five Grafts |
title_full_unstemmed | What Is the Best Candidate to Replace the Tarsus? A Biomechanical, Histological, and Optical Study Comparing Five Grafts |
title_short | What Is the Best Candidate to Replace the Tarsus? A Biomechanical, Histological, and Optical Study Comparing Five Grafts |
title_sort | what is the best candidate to replace the tarsus? a biomechanical, histological, and optical study comparing five grafts |
topic | Lacrimal Apparatus, Eyelids, Orbit |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36472880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.12.6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martiniken whatisthebestcandidatetoreplacethetarsusabiomechanicalhistologicalandopticalstudycomparingfivegrafts AT schaubsebastien whatisthebestcandidatetoreplacethetarsusabiomechanicalhistologicalandopticalstudycomparingfivegrafts AT bertolotocorine whatisthebestcandidatetoreplacethetarsusabiomechanicalhistologicalandopticalstudycomparingfivegrafts AT baillifstephanie whatisthebestcandidatetoreplacethetarsusabiomechanicalhistologicalandopticalstudycomparingfivegrafts AT lassallesandra whatisthebestcandidatetoreplacethetarsusabiomechanicalhistologicalandopticalstudycomparingfivegrafts AT martelpaul whatisthebestcandidatetoreplacethetarsusabiomechanicalhistologicalandopticalstudycomparingfivegrafts AT martelarnaud whatisthebestcandidatetoreplacethetarsusabiomechanicalhistologicalandopticalstudycomparingfivegrafts |