Cargando…
Development of a set of patient reported outcome measures for patients with benign liver tumours and cysts: patient focus groups and systematic review
BACKGROUND: Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) may be useful for patients with benign liver tumours and cysts (BLTC) to evaluate the impact of treatment and/or guide shared decision making. Yet, a set of PROMs relevant to patients with BLTC is currently unavailable. In this study, we selected...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733760/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36484883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00531-1 |
_version_ | 1784846442653810688 |
---|---|
author | Furumaya, Alicia Nooijen, Lynn E. Haring, Martijn P. D. van Oers, Hedy A. van Beneden, Marlou van Rosmalen, Belle V. Takkenberg, R. Bart Kazemier, Geert Besselink, Marc G. de Meijer, Vincent E. Erdmann, Joris I. |
author_facet | Furumaya, Alicia Nooijen, Lynn E. Haring, Martijn P. D. van Oers, Hedy A. van Beneden, Marlou van Rosmalen, Belle V. Takkenberg, R. Bart Kazemier, Geert Besselink, Marc G. de Meijer, Vincent E. Erdmann, Joris I. |
author_sort | Furumaya, Alicia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) may be useful for patients with benign liver tumours and cysts (BLTC) to evaluate the impact of treatment and/or guide shared decision making. Yet, a set of PROMs relevant to patients with BLTC is currently unavailable. In this study, we selected a PROMs set for patients with BLTC. METHODS: Potentially relevant patient reported outcomes (PROs) were selected by psychologist-researchers based on keywords used or suggested by participants of two virtual focus groups meetings consisting of thirteen female BLTC patients with a median age of 50 years. Subsequently, patients were asked to report their most relevant PROs. PROMs identified by systematic literature review and computerized adaptive tests (CATs) in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) were considered in selecting the final PROMs set to assess relevant outcomes. RESULTS: The most important PROs were: insecurity/anxiety (11/12 patients), pain (9/12 patients), fatigue (8/12 patients), and limitations in daily life (5/12 patients). The literature review included 23 studies, which used various generic and disease-specific PROMs, often not measuring (all) relevant PROs. The final selected PROMs set included numerical rating scales for pain, two questions on overall health and quality of life and four PROMIS CATs. CONCLUSIONS: A PROMs set generically and efficiently measuring outcomes relevant for patients with BLTC was developed and may be used in future research and clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00531-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9733760 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97337602022-12-10 Development of a set of patient reported outcome measures for patients with benign liver tumours and cysts: patient focus groups and systematic review Furumaya, Alicia Nooijen, Lynn E. Haring, Martijn P. D. van Oers, Hedy A. van Beneden, Marlou van Rosmalen, Belle V. Takkenberg, R. Bart Kazemier, Geert Besselink, Marc G. de Meijer, Vincent E. Erdmann, Joris I. J Patient Rep Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) may be useful for patients with benign liver tumours and cysts (BLTC) to evaluate the impact of treatment and/or guide shared decision making. Yet, a set of PROMs relevant to patients with BLTC is currently unavailable. In this study, we selected a PROMs set for patients with BLTC. METHODS: Potentially relevant patient reported outcomes (PROs) were selected by psychologist-researchers based on keywords used or suggested by participants of two virtual focus groups meetings consisting of thirteen female BLTC patients with a median age of 50 years. Subsequently, patients were asked to report their most relevant PROs. PROMs identified by systematic literature review and computerized adaptive tests (CATs) in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) were considered in selecting the final PROMs set to assess relevant outcomes. RESULTS: The most important PROs were: insecurity/anxiety (11/12 patients), pain (9/12 patients), fatigue (8/12 patients), and limitations in daily life (5/12 patients). The literature review included 23 studies, which used various generic and disease-specific PROMs, often not measuring (all) relevant PROs. The final selected PROMs set included numerical rating scales for pain, two questions on overall health and quality of life and four PROMIS CATs. CONCLUSIONS: A PROMs set generically and efficiently measuring outcomes relevant for patients with BLTC was developed and may be used in future research and clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00531-1. Springer International Publishing 2022-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9733760/ /pubmed/36484883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00531-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Furumaya, Alicia Nooijen, Lynn E. Haring, Martijn P. D. van Oers, Hedy A. van Beneden, Marlou van Rosmalen, Belle V. Takkenberg, R. Bart Kazemier, Geert Besselink, Marc G. de Meijer, Vincent E. Erdmann, Joris I. Development of a set of patient reported outcome measures for patients with benign liver tumours and cysts: patient focus groups and systematic review |
title | Development of a set of patient reported outcome measures for patients with benign liver tumours and cysts: patient focus groups and systematic review |
title_full | Development of a set of patient reported outcome measures for patients with benign liver tumours and cysts: patient focus groups and systematic review |
title_fullStr | Development of a set of patient reported outcome measures for patients with benign liver tumours and cysts: patient focus groups and systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a set of patient reported outcome measures for patients with benign liver tumours and cysts: patient focus groups and systematic review |
title_short | Development of a set of patient reported outcome measures for patients with benign liver tumours and cysts: patient focus groups and systematic review |
title_sort | development of a set of patient reported outcome measures for patients with benign liver tumours and cysts: patient focus groups and systematic review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733760/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36484883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00531-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT furumayaalicia developmentofasetofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpatientswithbenignlivertumoursandcystspatientfocusgroupsandsystematicreview AT nooijenlynne developmentofasetofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpatientswithbenignlivertumoursandcystspatientfocusgroupsandsystematicreview AT haringmartijnpd developmentofasetofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpatientswithbenignlivertumoursandcystspatientfocusgroupsandsystematicreview AT vanoershedya developmentofasetofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpatientswithbenignlivertumoursandcystspatientfocusgroupsandsystematicreview AT vanbenedenmarlou developmentofasetofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpatientswithbenignlivertumoursandcystspatientfocusgroupsandsystematicreview AT vanrosmalenbellev developmentofasetofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpatientswithbenignlivertumoursandcystspatientfocusgroupsandsystematicreview AT takkenbergrbart developmentofasetofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpatientswithbenignlivertumoursandcystspatientfocusgroupsandsystematicreview AT kazemiergeert developmentofasetofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpatientswithbenignlivertumoursandcystspatientfocusgroupsandsystematicreview AT besselinkmarcg developmentofasetofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpatientswithbenignlivertumoursandcystspatientfocusgroupsandsystematicreview AT demeijervincente developmentofasetofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpatientswithbenignlivertumoursandcystspatientfocusgroupsandsystematicreview AT erdmannjorisi developmentofasetofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpatientswithbenignlivertumoursandcystspatientfocusgroupsandsystematicreview AT developmentofasetofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresforpatientswithbenignlivertumoursandcystspatientfocusgroupsandsystematicreview |