Cargando…

A comparative study of RF heating of deep brain stimulation devices in vertical vs. horizontal MRI systems

The majority of studies that assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) induced radiofrequency (RF) heating of the tissue when active electronic implants are present have been performed in horizontal, closed-bore MRI systems. Vertical, open-bore MRI systems have a 90° rotated magnet and a fundamentally...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vu, Jasmine, Bhusal, Bhumi, Nguyen, Bach T., Sanpitak, Pia, Nowac, Elizabeth, Pilitsis, Julie, Rosenow, Joshua, Golestanirad, Laleh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36490249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278187
_version_ 1784846464419102720
author Vu, Jasmine
Bhusal, Bhumi
Nguyen, Bach T.
Sanpitak, Pia
Nowac, Elizabeth
Pilitsis, Julie
Rosenow, Joshua
Golestanirad, Laleh
author_facet Vu, Jasmine
Bhusal, Bhumi
Nguyen, Bach T.
Sanpitak, Pia
Nowac, Elizabeth
Pilitsis, Julie
Rosenow, Joshua
Golestanirad, Laleh
author_sort Vu, Jasmine
collection PubMed
description The majority of studies that assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) induced radiofrequency (RF) heating of the tissue when active electronic implants are present have been performed in horizontal, closed-bore MRI systems. Vertical, open-bore MRI systems have a 90° rotated magnet and a fundamentally different RF coil geometry, thus generating a substantially different RF field distribution inside the body. Little is known about the RF heating of elongated implants such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices in this class of scanners. Here, we conducted the first large-scale experimental study investigating whether RF heating was significantly different in a 1.2 T vertical field MRI scanner (Oasis, Fujifilm Healthcare) compared to a 1.5 T horizontal field MRI scanner (Aera, Siemens Healthineers). A commercial DBS device mimicking 30 realistic patient-derived lead trajectories extracted from postoperative computed tomography images of patients who underwent DBS surgery at our institution was implanted in a multi-material, anthropomorphic phantom. RF heating around the DBS lead was measured during four minutes of high-SAR RF exposure. Additionally, we performed electromagnetic simulations with leads of various internal structures to examine this effect on RF heating. When controlling for RMS B(1)(+), the temperature increase around the DBS lead-tip was significantly lower in the vertical scanner compared to the horizontal scanner (0.33 ± 0.24°C vs. 4.19 ± 2.29°C). Electromagnetic simulations demonstrated up to a 17-fold reduction in the maximum of 0.1g-averaged SAR in the tissue surrounding the lead-tip in the vertical scanner compared to the horizontal scanner. Results were consistent across leads with straight and helical internal wires. Radiofrequency heating and power deposition around the DBS lead-tip were substantially lower in the 1.2 T vertical scanner compared to the 1.5 T horizontal scanner. Simulations with different lead structures suggest that the results may extend to leads from other manufacturers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9733854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97338542022-12-10 A comparative study of RF heating of deep brain stimulation devices in vertical vs. horizontal MRI systems Vu, Jasmine Bhusal, Bhumi Nguyen, Bach T. Sanpitak, Pia Nowac, Elizabeth Pilitsis, Julie Rosenow, Joshua Golestanirad, Laleh PLoS One Research Article The majority of studies that assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) induced radiofrequency (RF) heating of the tissue when active electronic implants are present have been performed in horizontal, closed-bore MRI systems. Vertical, open-bore MRI systems have a 90° rotated magnet and a fundamentally different RF coil geometry, thus generating a substantially different RF field distribution inside the body. Little is known about the RF heating of elongated implants such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices in this class of scanners. Here, we conducted the first large-scale experimental study investigating whether RF heating was significantly different in a 1.2 T vertical field MRI scanner (Oasis, Fujifilm Healthcare) compared to a 1.5 T horizontal field MRI scanner (Aera, Siemens Healthineers). A commercial DBS device mimicking 30 realistic patient-derived lead trajectories extracted from postoperative computed tomography images of patients who underwent DBS surgery at our institution was implanted in a multi-material, anthropomorphic phantom. RF heating around the DBS lead was measured during four minutes of high-SAR RF exposure. Additionally, we performed electromagnetic simulations with leads of various internal structures to examine this effect on RF heating. When controlling for RMS B(1)(+), the temperature increase around the DBS lead-tip was significantly lower in the vertical scanner compared to the horizontal scanner (0.33 ± 0.24°C vs. 4.19 ± 2.29°C). Electromagnetic simulations demonstrated up to a 17-fold reduction in the maximum of 0.1g-averaged SAR in the tissue surrounding the lead-tip in the vertical scanner compared to the horizontal scanner. Results were consistent across leads with straight and helical internal wires. Radiofrequency heating and power deposition around the DBS lead-tip were substantially lower in the 1.2 T vertical scanner compared to the 1.5 T horizontal scanner. Simulations with different lead structures suggest that the results may extend to leads from other manufacturers. Public Library of Science 2022-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9733854/ /pubmed/36490249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278187 Text en © 2022 Vu et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vu, Jasmine
Bhusal, Bhumi
Nguyen, Bach T.
Sanpitak, Pia
Nowac, Elizabeth
Pilitsis, Julie
Rosenow, Joshua
Golestanirad, Laleh
A comparative study of RF heating of deep brain stimulation devices in vertical vs. horizontal MRI systems
title A comparative study of RF heating of deep brain stimulation devices in vertical vs. horizontal MRI systems
title_full A comparative study of RF heating of deep brain stimulation devices in vertical vs. horizontal MRI systems
title_fullStr A comparative study of RF heating of deep brain stimulation devices in vertical vs. horizontal MRI systems
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of RF heating of deep brain stimulation devices in vertical vs. horizontal MRI systems
title_short A comparative study of RF heating of deep brain stimulation devices in vertical vs. horizontal MRI systems
title_sort comparative study of rf heating of deep brain stimulation devices in vertical vs. horizontal mri systems
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36490249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278187
work_keys_str_mv AT vujasmine acomparativestudyofrfheatingofdeepbrainstimulationdevicesinverticalvshorizontalmrisystems
AT bhusalbhumi acomparativestudyofrfheatingofdeepbrainstimulationdevicesinverticalvshorizontalmrisystems
AT nguyenbacht acomparativestudyofrfheatingofdeepbrainstimulationdevicesinverticalvshorizontalmrisystems
AT sanpitakpia acomparativestudyofrfheatingofdeepbrainstimulationdevicesinverticalvshorizontalmrisystems
AT nowacelizabeth acomparativestudyofrfheatingofdeepbrainstimulationdevicesinverticalvshorizontalmrisystems
AT pilitsisjulie acomparativestudyofrfheatingofdeepbrainstimulationdevicesinverticalvshorizontalmrisystems
AT rosenowjoshua acomparativestudyofrfheatingofdeepbrainstimulationdevicesinverticalvshorizontalmrisystems
AT golestaniradlaleh acomparativestudyofrfheatingofdeepbrainstimulationdevicesinverticalvshorizontalmrisystems
AT vujasmine comparativestudyofrfheatingofdeepbrainstimulationdevicesinverticalvshorizontalmrisystems
AT bhusalbhumi comparativestudyofrfheatingofdeepbrainstimulationdevicesinverticalvshorizontalmrisystems
AT nguyenbacht comparativestudyofrfheatingofdeepbrainstimulationdevicesinverticalvshorizontalmrisystems
AT sanpitakpia comparativestudyofrfheatingofdeepbrainstimulationdevicesinverticalvshorizontalmrisystems
AT nowacelizabeth comparativestudyofrfheatingofdeepbrainstimulationdevicesinverticalvshorizontalmrisystems
AT pilitsisjulie comparativestudyofrfheatingofdeepbrainstimulationdevicesinverticalvshorizontalmrisystems
AT rosenowjoshua comparativestudyofrfheatingofdeepbrainstimulationdevicesinverticalvshorizontalmrisystems
AT golestaniradlaleh comparativestudyofrfheatingofdeepbrainstimulationdevicesinverticalvshorizontalmrisystems