Cargando…

Responses of soccer players performing repeated maximal efforts in simulated conditions of the FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022: A holistic approach

This study aimed to assess the capacity for repeated maximal effort (RME) of soccer players in the thermo-natural conditions (NC) and in simulated conditions for the 2022 FIFA World Cup in Qatar (QSC). Twenty-four semi-professional soccer players participated in the study. The exercise test consiste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chmura, Paweł, Liu, Hongyou, Andrzejewski, Marcin, Tessitore, Antonio, Sadowski, Jerzy, Chmura, Jan, Rokita, Andrzej, Tański, Wojciech, Cicirko, Leszek, Konefał, Marek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36490259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276314
Descripción
Sumario:This study aimed to assess the capacity for repeated maximal effort (RME) of soccer players in the thermo-natural conditions (NC) and in simulated conditions for the 2022 FIFA World Cup in Qatar (QSC). Twenty-four semi-professional soccer players participated in the study. The exercise test consisted of ten 6-second maximal efforts on a cycloergometer. A 90-second passive rest interval was used. The test was performed in a Weiss Technik WK-26 climate test chamber in two different conditions: 1) thermo-neutral conditions (NC—20.5°C; 58.7% humidity); and 2) simulated conditions for the 2022 World Cup in Qatar (QSC—28.5 ± 1.92°C; 58.7 ± 8.64% humidity). Power-related, physiological, psychomotor, blood, and electrolyte variables were recorded. Results showed that (1) players achieved higher peak power (max 1607,46 ± 192,70 [W] - 3(rd) rep), needed less time to peak power (min 0,95 ± 0,27 [s] - 3(rd) rep), and had a higher fatigue slope (max 218,67 ± 59,64 [W/sek] - 7(th) rep) in QSC than in NC (in each repetition of study protocol); (2) between the 1st repetition and subsequent repetitions a number of significants in among physiological, blood-related, and electrolyte variables were noted, but their direction was similar in both simulated conditions (e.g. V’O2/kg 37,59 ± 3,96 vs 37,95 ± 3,17 [ml/min/kg] - 3(rd) rep, LAC 13,16 ± 2,61 vs 14,18 ± 3,13 [mg/dl] - 10(th) rep or K 4,54 ± 0,29 vs 4,79 ± 0,36 [mmol/l] - 2(nd) rep when compare QCS and NC respectively); (3) an 8°C of temperature difference between the climatic conditions did not significantly affect the soccer players’ physical and physiological responses in RME. The study results can be used in the design of training programs aimed to increase players’ physiological adaptations by simulating soccer-specific conditions of play in terms of anaerobic capacity, in particular, repetitive maximal efforts. These findings will be useful during the upcoming 2022 World Cup in Qatar and in locations where high ambient temperatures are customary.