Cargando…

Selective removal to soft dentine or selective removal to firm dentine for deep caries lesions ın permanent posterior teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial up to 2 years

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare selective removal to soft dentin (SRSD) and selective removal to firm dentin (SRFD) in permanent teeth. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the success rates of the two caries removal techniques. The secondary outcome o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gözetici-Çil, Burcu, Erdem-Hepşenoğlu, Yelda, Tekin, Alperen, Özcan, Mutlu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9734731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36460919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04815-0
_version_ 1784846632632713216
author Gözetici-Çil, Burcu
Erdem-Hepşenoğlu, Yelda
Tekin, Alperen
Özcan, Mutlu
author_facet Gözetici-Çil, Burcu
Erdem-Hepşenoğlu, Yelda
Tekin, Alperen
Özcan, Mutlu
author_sort Gözetici-Çil, Burcu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare selective removal to soft dentin (SRSD) and selective removal to firm dentin (SRFD) in permanent teeth. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the success rates of the two caries removal techniques. The secondary outcome of the study was to investigate whether or not calcium silicate-based material (CS) had an effect on the success rate of the treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 2018 and March 2020, patients with deep caries lesions were invited to participate in the study. Posterior teeth (N = 165) with primary caries lesion radiographically extending ¾ of dentin and positive response to cold test were randomly selected. A total of 134 participants meeting the inclusion criteria were randomized to SRSD and SRFD (control) groups. After the caries removal procedure, teeth with exposed pulps were assigned to the pulp exposure (PE) group, and the SRSD group was further divided into test 1 (with CS) and test 2 groups (without CS). Success was defined as a positive response to the cold test, a negative response to percussion, the absence of pain, an abscess, a fistula, and periapical alterations. Fisher–Freeman–Halton exact tests, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, and the log-rank tests were performed for comparisons between groups. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found between the success rates of test 1 (100%) and test 2 (93.5%) groups, whereas the proportion of success in control (82.4%) and PE (84%) groups were significantly lower when compared with test groups (p = 0.024; p < 0.05) at the end of 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: SRSD had a higher success rate when compared to SRFD to treat deep carious lesions after 2 years of follow-up. The use of CS material after SRSD as a liner had no effect on the treatment outcome. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: SRSD with good coronal sealing might be recommended without CS application for the treatment of deep caries lesions in permanent teeth. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registration number NCT04052685 (08/09/2019).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9734731
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97347312022-12-12 Selective removal to soft dentine or selective removal to firm dentine for deep caries lesions ın permanent posterior teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial up to 2 years Gözetici-Çil, Burcu Erdem-Hepşenoğlu, Yelda Tekin, Alperen Özcan, Mutlu Clin Oral Investig Research OBJECTIVES: The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare selective removal to soft dentin (SRSD) and selective removal to firm dentin (SRFD) in permanent teeth. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the success rates of the two caries removal techniques. The secondary outcome of the study was to investigate whether or not calcium silicate-based material (CS) had an effect on the success rate of the treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 2018 and March 2020, patients with deep caries lesions were invited to participate in the study. Posterior teeth (N = 165) with primary caries lesion radiographically extending ¾ of dentin and positive response to cold test were randomly selected. A total of 134 participants meeting the inclusion criteria were randomized to SRSD and SRFD (control) groups. After the caries removal procedure, teeth with exposed pulps were assigned to the pulp exposure (PE) group, and the SRSD group was further divided into test 1 (with CS) and test 2 groups (without CS). Success was defined as a positive response to the cold test, a negative response to percussion, the absence of pain, an abscess, a fistula, and periapical alterations. Fisher–Freeman–Halton exact tests, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, and the log-rank tests were performed for comparisons between groups. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found between the success rates of test 1 (100%) and test 2 (93.5%) groups, whereas the proportion of success in control (82.4%) and PE (84%) groups were significantly lower when compared with test groups (p = 0.024; p < 0.05) at the end of 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: SRSD had a higher success rate when compared to SRFD to treat deep carious lesions after 2 years of follow-up. The use of CS material after SRSD as a liner had no effect on the treatment outcome. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: SRSD with good coronal sealing might be recommended without CS application for the treatment of deep caries lesions in permanent teeth. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registration number NCT04052685 (08/09/2019). Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-12-03 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9734731/ /pubmed/36460919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04815-0 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Research
Gözetici-Çil, Burcu
Erdem-Hepşenoğlu, Yelda
Tekin, Alperen
Özcan, Mutlu
Selective removal to soft dentine or selective removal to firm dentine for deep caries lesions ın permanent posterior teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial up to 2 years
title Selective removal to soft dentine or selective removal to firm dentine for deep caries lesions ın permanent posterior teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial up to 2 years
title_full Selective removal to soft dentine or selective removal to firm dentine for deep caries lesions ın permanent posterior teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial up to 2 years
title_fullStr Selective removal to soft dentine or selective removal to firm dentine for deep caries lesions ın permanent posterior teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial up to 2 years
title_full_unstemmed Selective removal to soft dentine or selective removal to firm dentine for deep caries lesions ın permanent posterior teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial up to 2 years
title_short Selective removal to soft dentine or selective removal to firm dentine for deep caries lesions ın permanent posterior teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial up to 2 years
title_sort selective removal to soft dentine or selective removal to firm dentine for deep caries lesions ın permanent posterior teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial up to 2 years
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9734731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36460919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04815-0
work_keys_str_mv AT gozeticicilburcu selectiveremovaltosoftdentineorselectiveremovaltofirmdentinefordeepcarieslesionsınpermanentposteriorteetharandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialupto2years
AT erdemhepsenogluyelda selectiveremovaltosoftdentineorselectiveremovaltofirmdentinefordeepcarieslesionsınpermanentposteriorteetharandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialupto2years
AT tekinalperen selectiveremovaltosoftdentineorselectiveremovaltofirmdentinefordeepcarieslesionsınpermanentposteriorteetharandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialupto2years
AT ozcanmutlu selectiveremovaltosoftdentineorselectiveremovaltofirmdentinefordeepcarieslesionsınpermanentposteriorteetharandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialupto2years