Cargando…

Perceived Corona virus exposure as a function of interpersonal distance and time of a conversation

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic people were asked to keep interpersonal distance, wash their hands and avoid gatherings of people. But, do people understand how much a change of the distance to a virus infected person means for the exposure to that person’s virus? To answer this question, w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Svenson, Ola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9734792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36532849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s44155-022-00027-9
_version_ 1784846642714771456
author Svenson, Ola
author_facet Svenson, Ola
author_sort Svenson, Ola
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic people were asked to keep interpersonal distance, wash their hands and avoid gatherings of people. But, do people understand how much a change of the distance to a virus infected person means for the exposure to that person’s virus? To answer this question, we studied how people perceive virus exposure from an infected person at different distances and lengths of a conversation. METHOD: An online questionnaire was distributed to 101 participants drawn from the general US population. Participants judged perceived virus exposure at different interpersonal distances to an infected person in a face to face conversation of different lengths of time. A model based on empirical and theoretical studies of dispersion of particles in the air was used to estimate a person’s objective virus exposure during different times and distances from a virus source. The model and empirical data show that exposure changes with the square of the distance and linearly with time. RESULTS: A majority (78%) of the participants underestimated the effects on virus exposure following a change of interpersonal distance. The dominating bias was assuming that exposure varies linearly with distance. To illustrate, an approach to a virus source from 6 to 2 feet was judged to give a 3 times higher exposure but, objectively it is 9 times. By way of contrast, perceptions of exposure as a function of the duration of a conversation were unbiased. The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV2 virus is likely to be followed by other pandemics also caused by airborne Corona or other viruses. Therefore, the results are important for administrators when designing risk communications to the general public and workers in the health care sector about social distancing and infection risks. CONCLUSIONS: People quite drastically underestimate the increase in virus exposure following an approach to a virus infected person. They also overestimate exposure after a move away from an infected person. For public health reasons, the correct function connecting distance with virus exposure should be communicated to the general public to avoid deliberate violations of recommended interpersonal distances. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44155-022-00027-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9734792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97347922022-12-12 Perceived Corona virus exposure as a function of interpersonal distance and time of a conversation Svenson, Ola Discov Soc Sci Health Brief Communication BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic people were asked to keep interpersonal distance, wash their hands and avoid gatherings of people. But, do people understand how much a change of the distance to a virus infected person means for the exposure to that person’s virus? To answer this question, we studied how people perceive virus exposure from an infected person at different distances and lengths of a conversation. METHOD: An online questionnaire was distributed to 101 participants drawn from the general US population. Participants judged perceived virus exposure at different interpersonal distances to an infected person in a face to face conversation of different lengths of time. A model based on empirical and theoretical studies of dispersion of particles in the air was used to estimate a person’s objective virus exposure during different times and distances from a virus source. The model and empirical data show that exposure changes with the square of the distance and linearly with time. RESULTS: A majority (78%) of the participants underestimated the effects on virus exposure following a change of interpersonal distance. The dominating bias was assuming that exposure varies linearly with distance. To illustrate, an approach to a virus source from 6 to 2 feet was judged to give a 3 times higher exposure but, objectively it is 9 times. By way of contrast, perceptions of exposure as a function of the duration of a conversation were unbiased. The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV2 virus is likely to be followed by other pandemics also caused by airborne Corona or other viruses. Therefore, the results are important for administrators when designing risk communications to the general public and workers in the health care sector about social distancing and infection risks. CONCLUSIONS: People quite drastically underestimate the increase in virus exposure following an approach to a virus infected person. They also overestimate exposure after a move away from an infected person. For public health reasons, the correct function connecting distance with virus exposure should be communicated to the general public to avoid deliberate violations of recommended interpersonal distances. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44155-022-00027-9. Springer International Publishing 2022-12-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9734792/ /pubmed/36532849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s44155-022-00027-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Brief Communication
Svenson, Ola
Perceived Corona virus exposure as a function of interpersonal distance and time of a conversation
title Perceived Corona virus exposure as a function of interpersonal distance and time of a conversation
title_full Perceived Corona virus exposure as a function of interpersonal distance and time of a conversation
title_fullStr Perceived Corona virus exposure as a function of interpersonal distance and time of a conversation
title_full_unstemmed Perceived Corona virus exposure as a function of interpersonal distance and time of a conversation
title_short Perceived Corona virus exposure as a function of interpersonal distance and time of a conversation
title_sort perceived corona virus exposure as a function of interpersonal distance and time of a conversation
topic Brief Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9734792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36532849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s44155-022-00027-9
work_keys_str_mv AT svensonola perceivedcoronavirusexposureasafunctionofinterpersonaldistanceandtimeofaconversation