Cargando…

Comparison of Different Techniques for the Determination of Platinized Cytostatic Drugs in Urine Samples

Platinum-based cytostatic drugs are one of the most widely used cancer treatments. They are excreted via the urinary tract and can reach the environment through wastewater, posing a risk to human health due to their side effects. Four identification and quantification techniques, including liquid ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arenas, Marina, Martín, Julia, Santos, Juan Luis, Aparicio, Irene, Fernández-Sanfrancisco, Omar, Alonso, Esteban
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9735434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36500232
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238139
_version_ 1784846763652284416
author Arenas, Marina
Martín, Julia
Santos, Juan Luis
Aparicio, Irene
Fernández-Sanfrancisco, Omar
Alonso, Esteban
author_facet Arenas, Marina
Martín, Julia
Santos, Juan Luis
Aparicio, Irene
Fernández-Sanfrancisco, Omar
Alonso, Esteban
author_sort Arenas, Marina
collection PubMed
description Platinum-based cytostatic drugs are one of the most widely used cancer treatments. They are excreted via the urinary tract and can reach the environment through wastewater, posing a risk to human health due to their side effects. Four identification and quantification techniques, including liquid chromatography (LC) separation coupled to (i) a diode array ultraviolet (UV(DAD)) (ii), mass spectrometer in single ion monitoring mode (LC-MS) and (iii) multiple reaction monitoring mode (LC-MS/MS) and (iv) derivatization with diethyldithiocarbamate prior to LC-MS/MS analysis, have been optimized and compared for the multiresidue determination of main platinized cytostatic drugs (cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin) in urine samples. Parameters that affect the efficiency of the chromatographic separation and analytical determination of different methods (column, mobile phase, wavelength, precursor ions, fragmentor, and product ions) were optimized. Analytical features, such as matrix effect, sensitivity, precision, selectivity, and linearity, were calculated. In terms of selectivity, the derivatization technique was discarded since it was only applicable to the platinated sum. A high dilution of the sample with LC-UV(DAD) was needed to reduce the matrix effect. Overall, the LC-MS/MS method presented the best analytical features (% RSD ≤ 12.8%, R(2) ≥ 0.991, or method-detection limits between 0.01–1 µg mL(−1)). The selected method was applied to the quantification of platinized cytostatic drugs in hospital urine samples from oncologic patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9735434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97354342022-12-11 Comparison of Different Techniques for the Determination of Platinized Cytostatic Drugs in Urine Samples Arenas, Marina Martín, Julia Santos, Juan Luis Aparicio, Irene Fernández-Sanfrancisco, Omar Alonso, Esteban Molecules Article Platinum-based cytostatic drugs are one of the most widely used cancer treatments. They are excreted via the urinary tract and can reach the environment through wastewater, posing a risk to human health due to their side effects. Four identification and quantification techniques, including liquid chromatography (LC) separation coupled to (i) a diode array ultraviolet (UV(DAD)) (ii), mass spectrometer in single ion monitoring mode (LC-MS) and (iii) multiple reaction monitoring mode (LC-MS/MS) and (iv) derivatization with diethyldithiocarbamate prior to LC-MS/MS analysis, have been optimized and compared for the multiresidue determination of main platinized cytostatic drugs (cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin) in urine samples. Parameters that affect the efficiency of the chromatographic separation and analytical determination of different methods (column, mobile phase, wavelength, precursor ions, fragmentor, and product ions) were optimized. Analytical features, such as matrix effect, sensitivity, precision, selectivity, and linearity, were calculated. In terms of selectivity, the derivatization technique was discarded since it was only applicable to the platinated sum. A high dilution of the sample with LC-UV(DAD) was needed to reduce the matrix effect. Overall, the LC-MS/MS method presented the best analytical features (% RSD ≤ 12.8%, R(2) ≥ 0.991, or method-detection limits between 0.01–1 µg mL(−1)). The selected method was applied to the quantification of platinized cytostatic drugs in hospital urine samples from oncologic patients. MDPI 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9735434/ /pubmed/36500232 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238139 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Arenas, Marina
Martín, Julia
Santos, Juan Luis
Aparicio, Irene
Fernández-Sanfrancisco, Omar
Alonso, Esteban
Comparison of Different Techniques for the Determination of Platinized Cytostatic Drugs in Urine Samples
title Comparison of Different Techniques for the Determination of Platinized Cytostatic Drugs in Urine Samples
title_full Comparison of Different Techniques for the Determination of Platinized Cytostatic Drugs in Urine Samples
title_fullStr Comparison of Different Techniques for the Determination of Platinized Cytostatic Drugs in Urine Samples
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Different Techniques for the Determination of Platinized Cytostatic Drugs in Urine Samples
title_short Comparison of Different Techniques for the Determination of Platinized Cytostatic Drugs in Urine Samples
title_sort comparison of different techniques for the determination of platinized cytostatic drugs in urine samples
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9735434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36500232
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238139
work_keys_str_mv AT arenasmarina comparisonofdifferenttechniquesforthedeterminationofplatinizedcytostaticdrugsinurinesamples
AT martinjulia comparisonofdifferenttechniquesforthedeterminationofplatinizedcytostaticdrugsinurinesamples
AT santosjuanluis comparisonofdifferenttechniquesforthedeterminationofplatinizedcytostaticdrugsinurinesamples
AT aparicioirene comparisonofdifferenttechniquesforthedeterminationofplatinizedcytostaticdrugsinurinesamples
AT fernandezsanfranciscoomar comparisonofdifferenttechniquesforthedeterminationofplatinizedcytostaticdrugsinurinesamples
AT alonsoesteban comparisonofdifferenttechniquesforthedeterminationofplatinizedcytostaticdrugsinurinesamples