Cargando…
Application of Transformer Models to Landslide Susceptibility Mapping
Landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) is of great significance for the identification and prevention of geological hazards. LSM is based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs); CNNs use fixed convolutional kernels, focus more on local information and do not retain spatial information. This is a pr...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9735583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36501806 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22239104 |
_version_ | 1784846805083619328 |
---|---|
author | Bao, Shuai Liu, Jiping Wang, Liang Zhao, Xizhi |
author_facet | Bao, Shuai Liu, Jiping Wang, Liang Zhao, Xizhi |
author_sort | Bao, Shuai |
collection | PubMed |
description | Landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) is of great significance for the identification and prevention of geological hazards. LSM is based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs); CNNs use fixed convolutional kernels, focus more on local information and do not retain spatial information. This is a property of the CNN itself, resulting in low accuracy of LSM. Based on the above problems, we use Vision Transformer (ViT) and its derivative model Swin Transformer (Swin) to conduct LSM for the selected study area. Machine learning and a CNN model are used for comparison. Fourier transform amplitude, feature similarity and other indicators were used to compare and analyze the difference in the results. The results show that the Swin model has the best accuracy, F1-score and AUC. The results of LSM are combined with landslide points, faults and other data analysis; the ViT model results are the most consistent with the actual situation, showing the strongest generalization ability. In this paper, we believe that the advantages of ViT and its derived models in global feature extraction ensure that ViT is more accurate than CNN and machine learning in predicting landslide probability in the study area. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9735583 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97355832022-12-11 Application of Transformer Models to Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Bao, Shuai Liu, Jiping Wang, Liang Zhao, Xizhi Sensors (Basel) Article Landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) is of great significance for the identification and prevention of geological hazards. LSM is based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs); CNNs use fixed convolutional kernels, focus more on local information and do not retain spatial information. This is a property of the CNN itself, resulting in low accuracy of LSM. Based on the above problems, we use Vision Transformer (ViT) and its derivative model Swin Transformer (Swin) to conduct LSM for the selected study area. Machine learning and a CNN model are used for comparison. Fourier transform amplitude, feature similarity and other indicators were used to compare and analyze the difference in the results. The results show that the Swin model has the best accuracy, F1-score and AUC. The results of LSM are combined with landslide points, faults and other data analysis; the ViT model results are the most consistent with the actual situation, showing the strongest generalization ability. In this paper, we believe that the advantages of ViT and its derived models in global feature extraction ensure that ViT is more accurate than CNN and machine learning in predicting landslide probability in the study area. MDPI 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9735583/ /pubmed/36501806 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22239104 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bao, Shuai Liu, Jiping Wang, Liang Zhao, Xizhi Application of Transformer Models to Landslide Susceptibility Mapping |
title | Application of Transformer Models to Landslide Susceptibility Mapping |
title_full | Application of Transformer Models to Landslide Susceptibility Mapping |
title_fullStr | Application of Transformer Models to Landslide Susceptibility Mapping |
title_full_unstemmed | Application of Transformer Models to Landslide Susceptibility Mapping |
title_short | Application of Transformer Models to Landslide Susceptibility Mapping |
title_sort | application of transformer models to landslide susceptibility mapping |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9735583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36501806 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22239104 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baoshuai applicationoftransformermodelstolandslidesusceptibilitymapping AT liujiping applicationoftransformermodelstolandslidesusceptibilitymapping AT wangliang applicationoftransformermodelstolandslidesusceptibilitymapping AT zhaoxizhi applicationoftransformermodelstolandslidesusceptibilitymapping |