Cargando…
Meaning Analysis and Alienation: A Method of Immanent Critique in Acute Psychiatry
In acute psychiatry, where people with severe mental disorders are frequently treated, there can be contradictions between concepts of illness among, e.g., patients and healthcare professionals, and also between medical and legal aspects. These contradictions do not manifest themselves openly but ar...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9735647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498269 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316194 |
_version_ | 1784846821832523776 |
---|---|
author | Dechent, Frieder Moeller, Julian Huber, Christian G. |
author_facet | Dechent, Frieder Moeller, Julian Huber, Christian G. |
author_sort | Dechent, Frieder |
collection | PubMed |
description | In acute psychiatry, where people with severe mental disorders are frequently treated, there can be contradictions between concepts of illness among, e.g., patients and healthcare professionals, and also between medical and legal aspects. These contradictions do not manifest themselves openly but are immanent in the social practices of the treatment teams as contradictions between the social level and the individual level. They can lead to alienation, which may be reflected in poorer quality of treatment, such as the more frequent use of coercive measures or poorer adherence to therapy in patients. In the normal daily routine of a clinic, these contradictions are mostly hidden by hierarchical structures or by unbalanced concepts of psychiatric illness, or external critique is used to try to solve these contradictions. However, another way of dealing with these contradictions could be to analyze the potential and causes for alienation through systematic analysis and transformation of the whole system of a psychiatric ward to reduce the level of contradiction within it. The aim of this work is to use the concept of meaning elaborated by Luhmann to identify and recognize alienation potentials as concretely as possible and thus make them accessible to immanent critique. Meaning in Luhmann’s use of the term serves to reduce complexity in a social context and always opens up consequential possibilities for action. Consequential limited possibilities at the level of action in a rigid social system (which psychiatric wards can be) can—at an individual level—lead to people subordinating themselves to the rigid system to an excessive degree and thus alienating themselves from the system. Thus, a rigid system with a narrowing of consequential possibilities excludes meaningful consequential possibilities. This leads to alienating contradictions and to possibilities of world appropriation being missed. The aim of the current analysis is not to make a general critique of psychiatry but to improve the theoretical basis to better understand the problem of alienation in acute psychiatry as a symptom of system-immanent contradictions and thus open up the possibility of transforming systems, e.g., psychiatric acute care units, by means of immanent critique. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9735647 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97356472022-12-11 Meaning Analysis and Alienation: A Method of Immanent Critique in Acute Psychiatry Dechent, Frieder Moeller, Julian Huber, Christian G. Int J Environ Res Public Health Opinion In acute psychiatry, where people with severe mental disorders are frequently treated, there can be contradictions between concepts of illness among, e.g., patients and healthcare professionals, and also between medical and legal aspects. These contradictions do not manifest themselves openly but are immanent in the social practices of the treatment teams as contradictions between the social level and the individual level. They can lead to alienation, which may be reflected in poorer quality of treatment, such as the more frequent use of coercive measures or poorer adherence to therapy in patients. In the normal daily routine of a clinic, these contradictions are mostly hidden by hierarchical structures or by unbalanced concepts of psychiatric illness, or external critique is used to try to solve these contradictions. However, another way of dealing with these contradictions could be to analyze the potential and causes for alienation through systematic analysis and transformation of the whole system of a psychiatric ward to reduce the level of contradiction within it. The aim of this work is to use the concept of meaning elaborated by Luhmann to identify and recognize alienation potentials as concretely as possible and thus make them accessible to immanent critique. Meaning in Luhmann’s use of the term serves to reduce complexity in a social context and always opens up consequential possibilities for action. Consequential limited possibilities at the level of action in a rigid social system (which psychiatric wards can be) can—at an individual level—lead to people subordinating themselves to the rigid system to an excessive degree and thus alienating themselves from the system. Thus, a rigid system with a narrowing of consequential possibilities excludes meaningful consequential possibilities. This leads to alienating contradictions and to possibilities of world appropriation being missed. The aim of the current analysis is not to make a general critique of psychiatry but to improve the theoretical basis to better understand the problem of alienation in acute psychiatry as a symptom of system-immanent contradictions and thus open up the possibility of transforming systems, e.g., psychiatric acute care units, by means of immanent critique. MDPI 2022-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9735647/ /pubmed/36498269 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316194 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Opinion Dechent, Frieder Moeller, Julian Huber, Christian G. Meaning Analysis and Alienation: A Method of Immanent Critique in Acute Psychiatry |
title | Meaning Analysis and Alienation: A Method of Immanent Critique in Acute Psychiatry |
title_full | Meaning Analysis and Alienation: A Method of Immanent Critique in Acute Psychiatry |
title_fullStr | Meaning Analysis and Alienation: A Method of Immanent Critique in Acute Psychiatry |
title_full_unstemmed | Meaning Analysis and Alienation: A Method of Immanent Critique in Acute Psychiatry |
title_short | Meaning Analysis and Alienation: A Method of Immanent Critique in Acute Psychiatry |
title_sort | meaning analysis and alienation: a method of immanent critique in acute psychiatry |
topic | Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9735647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498269 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316194 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dechentfrieder meaninganalysisandalienationamethodofimmanentcritiqueinacutepsychiatry AT moellerjulian meaninganalysisandalienationamethodofimmanentcritiqueinacutepsychiatry AT huberchristiang meaninganalysisandalienationamethodofimmanentcritiqueinacutepsychiatry |