Cargando…
The Nitrogen Dynamics of Newly Developed Lignite-Based Controlled-Release Fertilisers in the Soil-Plant Cycle
The effect of newly developed controlled-release fertilisers (CRFs); Epox5 and Ver-1 and two levels of Fe(2+) applications (478 and 239 kg-FeSO(4) ha(−1)) on controlling nitrogen (N) losses, were tested on ryegrass, in a climate-controlled lysimeter system. The Epox5 and Ver-1 effectively decreased...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9735692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36501328 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11233288 |
_version_ | 1784846833541971968 |
---|---|
author | Abhiram, Gunaratnam Grafton, Miles Jeyakumar, Paramsothy Bishop, Peter Davies, Clive E. McCurdy, Murray |
author_facet | Abhiram, Gunaratnam Grafton, Miles Jeyakumar, Paramsothy Bishop, Peter Davies, Clive E. McCurdy, Murray |
author_sort | Abhiram, Gunaratnam |
collection | PubMed |
description | The effect of newly developed controlled-release fertilisers (CRFs); Epox5 and Ver-1 and two levels of Fe(2+) applications (478 and 239 kg-FeSO(4) ha(−1)) on controlling nitrogen (N) losses, were tested on ryegrass, in a climate-controlled lysimeter system. The Epox5 and Ver-1 effectively decreased the total N losses by 37 and 47%, respectively, compared to urea. Nitrous oxide (N(2)O) emissions by Ver-1 were comparable to urea. However, Epox5 showed significantly higher (p < 0.05) N(2)O emissions (0.5 kg-N ha(−1)), compared to other treatments, possibly due to the lock-off nitrogen in Epox5. The application of Fe(2+) did not show a significant effect in controlling the N leaching loss and N(2)O emission. Therefore, a dissimilatory nitrate reduction and chemodenitrification pathways were not pronounced in this study. The total dry matter yield, N accumulation, N use efficiency and soil residual N were not significantly different among any N treatments. Nevertheless, the N accumulation of CRFs was lower in the first month, possibly due to the slow release of urea. The total root biomass was significantly (p < 0.05) lower for Epox5 (35%), compared to urea. The hierarchical clustering of all treatments revealed that Ver-1 outperformed other treatments, followed by Epox5. Further studies are merited to identify the potential of Fe(2+) as a controlling agent for N losses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9735692 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97356922022-12-11 The Nitrogen Dynamics of Newly Developed Lignite-Based Controlled-Release Fertilisers in the Soil-Plant Cycle Abhiram, Gunaratnam Grafton, Miles Jeyakumar, Paramsothy Bishop, Peter Davies, Clive E. McCurdy, Murray Plants (Basel) Article The effect of newly developed controlled-release fertilisers (CRFs); Epox5 and Ver-1 and two levels of Fe(2+) applications (478 and 239 kg-FeSO(4) ha(−1)) on controlling nitrogen (N) losses, were tested on ryegrass, in a climate-controlled lysimeter system. The Epox5 and Ver-1 effectively decreased the total N losses by 37 and 47%, respectively, compared to urea. Nitrous oxide (N(2)O) emissions by Ver-1 were comparable to urea. However, Epox5 showed significantly higher (p < 0.05) N(2)O emissions (0.5 kg-N ha(−1)), compared to other treatments, possibly due to the lock-off nitrogen in Epox5. The application of Fe(2+) did not show a significant effect in controlling the N leaching loss and N(2)O emission. Therefore, a dissimilatory nitrate reduction and chemodenitrification pathways were not pronounced in this study. The total dry matter yield, N accumulation, N use efficiency and soil residual N were not significantly different among any N treatments. Nevertheless, the N accumulation of CRFs was lower in the first month, possibly due to the slow release of urea. The total root biomass was significantly (p < 0.05) lower for Epox5 (35%), compared to urea. The hierarchical clustering of all treatments revealed that Ver-1 outperformed other treatments, followed by Epox5. Further studies are merited to identify the potential of Fe(2+) as a controlling agent for N losses. MDPI 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9735692/ /pubmed/36501328 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11233288 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Abhiram, Gunaratnam Grafton, Miles Jeyakumar, Paramsothy Bishop, Peter Davies, Clive E. McCurdy, Murray The Nitrogen Dynamics of Newly Developed Lignite-Based Controlled-Release Fertilisers in the Soil-Plant Cycle |
title | The Nitrogen Dynamics of Newly Developed Lignite-Based Controlled-Release Fertilisers in the Soil-Plant Cycle |
title_full | The Nitrogen Dynamics of Newly Developed Lignite-Based Controlled-Release Fertilisers in the Soil-Plant Cycle |
title_fullStr | The Nitrogen Dynamics of Newly Developed Lignite-Based Controlled-Release Fertilisers in the Soil-Plant Cycle |
title_full_unstemmed | The Nitrogen Dynamics of Newly Developed Lignite-Based Controlled-Release Fertilisers in the Soil-Plant Cycle |
title_short | The Nitrogen Dynamics of Newly Developed Lignite-Based Controlled-Release Fertilisers in the Soil-Plant Cycle |
title_sort | nitrogen dynamics of newly developed lignite-based controlled-release fertilisers in the soil-plant cycle |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9735692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36501328 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11233288 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abhiramgunaratnam thenitrogendynamicsofnewlydevelopedlignitebasedcontrolledreleasefertilisersinthesoilplantcycle AT graftonmiles thenitrogendynamicsofnewlydevelopedlignitebasedcontrolledreleasefertilisersinthesoilplantcycle AT jeyakumarparamsothy thenitrogendynamicsofnewlydevelopedlignitebasedcontrolledreleasefertilisersinthesoilplantcycle AT bishoppeter thenitrogendynamicsofnewlydevelopedlignitebasedcontrolledreleasefertilisersinthesoilplantcycle AT daviesclivee thenitrogendynamicsofnewlydevelopedlignitebasedcontrolledreleasefertilisersinthesoilplantcycle AT mccurdymurray thenitrogendynamicsofnewlydevelopedlignitebasedcontrolledreleasefertilisersinthesoilplantcycle AT abhiramgunaratnam nitrogendynamicsofnewlydevelopedlignitebasedcontrolledreleasefertilisersinthesoilplantcycle AT graftonmiles nitrogendynamicsofnewlydevelopedlignitebasedcontrolledreleasefertilisersinthesoilplantcycle AT jeyakumarparamsothy nitrogendynamicsofnewlydevelopedlignitebasedcontrolledreleasefertilisersinthesoilplantcycle AT bishoppeter nitrogendynamicsofnewlydevelopedlignitebasedcontrolledreleasefertilisersinthesoilplantcycle AT daviesclivee nitrogendynamicsofnewlydevelopedlignitebasedcontrolledreleasefertilisersinthesoilplantcycle AT mccurdymurray nitrogendynamicsofnewlydevelopedlignitebasedcontrolledreleasefertilisersinthesoilplantcycle |