Cargando…

The Nitrogen Dynamics of Newly Developed Lignite-Based Controlled-Release Fertilisers in the Soil-Plant Cycle

The effect of newly developed controlled-release fertilisers (CRFs); Epox5 and Ver-1 and two levels of Fe(2+) applications (478 and 239 kg-FeSO(4) ha(−1)) on controlling nitrogen (N) losses, were tested on ryegrass, in a climate-controlled lysimeter system. The Epox5 and Ver-1 effectively decreased...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abhiram, Gunaratnam, Grafton, Miles, Jeyakumar, Paramsothy, Bishop, Peter, Davies, Clive E., McCurdy, Murray
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9735692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36501328
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11233288
_version_ 1784846833541971968
author Abhiram, Gunaratnam
Grafton, Miles
Jeyakumar, Paramsothy
Bishop, Peter
Davies, Clive E.
McCurdy, Murray
author_facet Abhiram, Gunaratnam
Grafton, Miles
Jeyakumar, Paramsothy
Bishop, Peter
Davies, Clive E.
McCurdy, Murray
author_sort Abhiram, Gunaratnam
collection PubMed
description The effect of newly developed controlled-release fertilisers (CRFs); Epox5 and Ver-1 and two levels of Fe(2+) applications (478 and 239 kg-FeSO(4) ha(−1)) on controlling nitrogen (N) losses, were tested on ryegrass, in a climate-controlled lysimeter system. The Epox5 and Ver-1 effectively decreased the total N losses by 37 and 47%, respectively, compared to urea. Nitrous oxide (N(2)O) emissions by Ver-1 were comparable to urea. However, Epox5 showed significantly higher (p < 0.05) N(2)O emissions (0.5 kg-N ha(−1)), compared to other treatments, possibly due to the lock-off nitrogen in Epox5. The application of Fe(2+) did not show a significant effect in controlling the N leaching loss and N(2)O emission. Therefore, a dissimilatory nitrate reduction and chemodenitrification pathways were not pronounced in this study. The total dry matter yield, N accumulation, N use efficiency and soil residual N were not significantly different among any N treatments. Nevertheless, the N accumulation of CRFs was lower in the first month, possibly due to the slow release of urea. The total root biomass was significantly (p < 0.05) lower for Epox5 (35%), compared to urea. The hierarchical clustering of all treatments revealed that Ver-1 outperformed other treatments, followed by Epox5. Further studies are merited to identify the potential of Fe(2+) as a controlling agent for N losses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9735692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97356922022-12-11 The Nitrogen Dynamics of Newly Developed Lignite-Based Controlled-Release Fertilisers in the Soil-Plant Cycle Abhiram, Gunaratnam Grafton, Miles Jeyakumar, Paramsothy Bishop, Peter Davies, Clive E. McCurdy, Murray Plants (Basel) Article The effect of newly developed controlled-release fertilisers (CRFs); Epox5 and Ver-1 and two levels of Fe(2+) applications (478 and 239 kg-FeSO(4) ha(−1)) on controlling nitrogen (N) losses, were tested on ryegrass, in a climate-controlled lysimeter system. The Epox5 and Ver-1 effectively decreased the total N losses by 37 and 47%, respectively, compared to urea. Nitrous oxide (N(2)O) emissions by Ver-1 were comparable to urea. However, Epox5 showed significantly higher (p < 0.05) N(2)O emissions (0.5 kg-N ha(−1)), compared to other treatments, possibly due to the lock-off nitrogen in Epox5. The application of Fe(2+) did not show a significant effect in controlling the N leaching loss and N(2)O emission. Therefore, a dissimilatory nitrate reduction and chemodenitrification pathways were not pronounced in this study. The total dry matter yield, N accumulation, N use efficiency and soil residual N were not significantly different among any N treatments. Nevertheless, the N accumulation of CRFs was lower in the first month, possibly due to the slow release of urea. The total root biomass was significantly (p < 0.05) lower for Epox5 (35%), compared to urea. The hierarchical clustering of all treatments revealed that Ver-1 outperformed other treatments, followed by Epox5. Further studies are merited to identify the potential of Fe(2+) as a controlling agent for N losses. MDPI 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9735692/ /pubmed/36501328 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11233288 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Abhiram, Gunaratnam
Grafton, Miles
Jeyakumar, Paramsothy
Bishop, Peter
Davies, Clive E.
McCurdy, Murray
The Nitrogen Dynamics of Newly Developed Lignite-Based Controlled-Release Fertilisers in the Soil-Plant Cycle
title The Nitrogen Dynamics of Newly Developed Lignite-Based Controlled-Release Fertilisers in the Soil-Plant Cycle
title_full The Nitrogen Dynamics of Newly Developed Lignite-Based Controlled-Release Fertilisers in the Soil-Plant Cycle
title_fullStr The Nitrogen Dynamics of Newly Developed Lignite-Based Controlled-Release Fertilisers in the Soil-Plant Cycle
title_full_unstemmed The Nitrogen Dynamics of Newly Developed Lignite-Based Controlled-Release Fertilisers in the Soil-Plant Cycle
title_short The Nitrogen Dynamics of Newly Developed Lignite-Based Controlled-Release Fertilisers in the Soil-Plant Cycle
title_sort nitrogen dynamics of newly developed lignite-based controlled-release fertilisers in the soil-plant cycle
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9735692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36501328
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11233288
work_keys_str_mv AT abhiramgunaratnam thenitrogendynamicsofnewlydevelopedlignitebasedcontrolledreleasefertilisersinthesoilplantcycle
AT graftonmiles thenitrogendynamicsofnewlydevelopedlignitebasedcontrolledreleasefertilisersinthesoilplantcycle
AT jeyakumarparamsothy thenitrogendynamicsofnewlydevelopedlignitebasedcontrolledreleasefertilisersinthesoilplantcycle
AT bishoppeter thenitrogendynamicsofnewlydevelopedlignitebasedcontrolledreleasefertilisersinthesoilplantcycle
AT daviesclivee thenitrogendynamicsofnewlydevelopedlignitebasedcontrolledreleasefertilisersinthesoilplantcycle
AT mccurdymurray thenitrogendynamicsofnewlydevelopedlignitebasedcontrolledreleasefertilisersinthesoilplantcycle
AT abhiramgunaratnam nitrogendynamicsofnewlydevelopedlignitebasedcontrolledreleasefertilisersinthesoilplantcycle
AT graftonmiles nitrogendynamicsofnewlydevelopedlignitebasedcontrolledreleasefertilisersinthesoilplantcycle
AT jeyakumarparamsothy nitrogendynamicsofnewlydevelopedlignitebasedcontrolledreleasefertilisersinthesoilplantcycle
AT bishoppeter nitrogendynamicsofnewlydevelopedlignitebasedcontrolledreleasefertilisersinthesoilplantcycle
AT daviesclivee nitrogendynamicsofnewlydevelopedlignitebasedcontrolledreleasefertilisersinthesoilplantcycle
AT mccurdymurray nitrogendynamicsofnewlydevelopedlignitebasedcontrolledreleasefertilisersinthesoilplantcycle