Cargando…

A Survey of 3D Indoor Localization Systems and Technologies

Indoor localization has recently and significantly attracted the interest of the research community mainly due to the fact that Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSSs) typically fail in indoor environments. In the last couple of decades, there have been several works reported in the literature t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sesyuk, Andrey, Ioannou, Stelios, Raspopoulos, Marios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9735771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36502083
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22239380
_version_ 1784846854007029760
author Sesyuk, Andrey
Ioannou, Stelios
Raspopoulos, Marios
author_facet Sesyuk, Andrey
Ioannou, Stelios
Raspopoulos, Marios
author_sort Sesyuk, Andrey
collection PubMed
description Indoor localization has recently and significantly attracted the interest of the research community mainly due to the fact that Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSSs) typically fail in indoor environments. In the last couple of decades, there have been several works reported in the literature that attempt to tackle the indoor localization problem. However, most of this work is focused solely on two-dimensional (2D) localization, while very few papers consider three dimensions (3D). There is also a noticeable lack of survey papers focusing on 3D indoor localization; hence, in this paper, we aim to carry out a survey and provide a detailed critical review of the current state of the art concerning 3D indoor localization including geometric approaches such as angle of arrival (AoA), time of arrival (ToA), time difference of arrival (TDoA), fingerprinting approaches based on Received Signal Strength (RSS), Channel State Information (CSI), Magnetic Field (MF) and Fine Time Measurement (FTM), as well as fusion-based and hybrid-positioning techniques. We provide a variety of technologies, with a focus on wireless technologies that may be utilized for 3D indoor localization such as WiFi, Bluetooth, UWB, mmWave, visible light and sound-based technologies. We critically analyze the advantages and disadvantages of each approach/technology in 3D localization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9735771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97357712022-12-11 A Survey of 3D Indoor Localization Systems and Technologies Sesyuk, Andrey Ioannou, Stelios Raspopoulos, Marios Sensors (Basel) Review Indoor localization has recently and significantly attracted the interest of the research community mainly due to the fact that Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSSs) typically fail in indoor environments. In the last couple of decades, there have been several works reported in the literature that attempt to tackle the indoor localization problem. However, most of this work is focused solely on two-dimensional (2D) localization, while very few papers consider three dimensions (3D). There is also a noticeable lack of survey papers focusing on 3D indoor localization; hence, in this paper, we aim to carry out a survey and provide a detailed critical review of the current state of the art concerning 3D indoor localization including geometric approaches such as angle of arrival (AoA), time of arrival (ToA), time difference of arrival (TDoA), fingerprinting approaches based on Received Signal Strength (RSS), Channel State Information (CSI), Magnetic Field (MF) and Fine Time Measurement (FTM), as well as fusion-based and hybrid-positioning techniques. We provide a variety of technologies, with a focus on wireless technologies that may be utilized for 3D indoor localization such as WiFi, Bluetooth, UWB, mmWave, visible light and sound-based technologies. We critically analyze the advantages and disadvantages of each approach/technology in 3D localization. MDPI 2022-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9735771/ /pubmed/36502083 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22239380 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Sesyuk, Andrey
Ioannou, Stelios
Raspopoulos, Marios
A Survey of 3D Indoor Localization Systems and Technologies
title A Survey of 3D Indoor Localization Systems and Technologies
title_full A Survey of 3D Indoor Localization Systems and Technologies
title_fullStr A Survey of 3D Indoor Localization Systems and Technologies
title_full_unstemmed A Survey of 3D Indoor Localization Systems and Technologies
title_short A Survey of 3D Indoor Localization Systems and Technologies
title_sort survey of 3d indoor localization systems and technologies
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9735771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36502083
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22239380
work_keys_str_mv AT sesyukandrey asurveyof3dindoorlocalizationsystemsandtechnologies
AT ioannoustelios asurveyof3dindoorlocalizationsystemsandtechnologies
AT raspopoulosmarios asurveyof3dindoorlocalizationsystemsandtechnologies
AT sesyukandrey surveyof3dindoorlocalizationsystemsandtechnologies
AT ioannoustelios surveyof3dindoorlocalizationsystemsandtechnologies
AT raspopoulosmarios surveyof3dindoorlocalizationsystemsandtechnologies