Cargando…
Evaluation of an Air Cleaning Device Equipped with Filtration and UV: Comparison of Removal Efficiency on Particulate Matter and Viable Airborne Bacteria in the Inlet and Treated Air
Since the COVID-19 pandemic, improving indoor air quality (IAQ) has become vital for the public as COVID-19 and other infectious diseases can transmit via inhalable aerosols. Air cleaning devices with filtration and targeted pollutant treatment capabilities can help improve IAQ. However, only a few...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9735963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498208 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316135 |
_version_ | 1784846903344627712 |
---|---|
author | Li, Peiyang Koziel, Jacek A. Macedo, Nubia Zimmerman, Jeffrey J. Wrzesinski, Danielle Sobotka, Erin Balderas, Mateo Walz, William B. Paris, Reid Vincent Lee, Myeongseong Liu, Dongjie Yedilbayev, Bauyrzhan Ramirez, Brett C. Jenks, William S. |
author_facet | Li, Peiyang Koziel, Jacek A. Macedo, Nubia Zimmerman, Jeffrey J. Wrzesinski, Danielle Sobotka, Erin Balderas, Mateo Walz, William B. Paris, Reid Vincent Lee, Myeongseong Liu, Dongjie Yedilbayev, Bauyrzhan Ramirez, Brett C. Jenks, William S. |
author_sort | Li, Peiyang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Since the COVID-19 pandemic, improving indoor air quality (IAQ) has become vital for the public as COVID-19 and other infectious diseases can transmit via inhalable aerosols. Air cleaning devices with filtration and targeted pollutant treatment capabilities can help improve IAQ. However, only a few filtration/UV devices have been formally tested for their effectiveness, and little data is publicly available and UV doses comparable. In this research, we upgraded a particulate matter (PM) air filtration prototype by adding UV-C (germicidal) light. We developed realistic UV dose metrics for fast-moving air and selected performance scenarios to quantify the mitigation effect on viable airborne bacteria and PM. The targeted PM included total suspended particulate (TSP) and a coarse-to-fine range sized at PM(10), PM(4), PM(2.5), and PM(1). The PM and viable airborne bacteria concentrations were compared between the inlet and outlet of the prototype at 0.5 and 1.0 m(3)/s (low and high) air flow modes. The upgraded prototype inactivated nearly 100% of viable airborne bacteria and removed up to 97% of TSP, 91% of PM(10), 87% of PM(4), 87% of PM(2.5), and 88% of PM(1). The performance in the low flow rate mode was generally better than in the high flow rate mode. The combination of filtration and UV-C treatment provided ‘double-barrier’ assurance for air purification and lowered the risk of spreading infectious micro-organisms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9735963 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97359632022-12-11 Evaluation of an Air Cleaning Device Equipped with Filtration and UV: Comparison of Removal Efficiency on Particulate Matter and Viable Airborne Bacteria in the Inlet and Treated Air Li, Peiyang Koziel, Jacek A. Macedo, Nubia Zimmerman, Jeffrey J. Wrzesinski, Danielle Sobotka, Erin Balderas, Mateo Walz, William B. Paris, Reid Vincent Lee, Myeongseong Liu, Dongjie Yedilbayev, Bauyrzhan Ramirez, Brett C. Jenks, William S. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Since the COVID-19 pandemic, improving indoor air quality (IAQ) has become vital for the public as COVID-19 and other infectious diseases can transmit via inhalable aerosols. Air cleaning devices with filtration and targeted pollutant treatment capabilities can help improve IAQ. However, only a few filtration/UV devices have been formally tested for their effectiveness, and little data is publicly available and UV doses comparable. In this research, we upgraded a particulate matter (PM) air filtration prototype by adding UV-C (germicidal) light. We developed realistic UV dose metrics for fast-moving air and selected performance scenarios to quantify the mitigation effect on viable airborne bacteria and PM. The targeted PM included total suspended particulate (TSP) and a coarse-to-fine range sized at PM(10), PM(4), PM(2.5), and PM(1). The PM and viable airborne bacteria concentrations were compared between the inlet and outlet of the prototype at 0.5 and 1.0 m(3)/s (low and high) air flow modes. The upgraded prototype inactivated nearly 100% of viable airborne bacteria and removed up to 97% of TSP, 91% of PM(10), 87% of PM(4), 87% of PM(2.5), and 88% of PM(1). The performance in the low flow rate mode was generally better than in the high flow rate mode. The combination of filtration and UV-C treatment provided ‘double-barrier’ assurance for air purification and lowered the risk of spreading infectious micro-organisms. MDPI 2022-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9735963/ /pubmed/36498208 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316135 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Li, Peiyang Koziel, Jacek A. Macedo, Nubia Zimmerman, Jeffrey J. Wrzesinski, Danielle Sobotka, Erin Balderas, Mateo Walz, William B. Paris, Reid Vincent Lee, Myeongseong Liu, Dongjie Yedilbayev, Bauyrzhan Ramirez, Brett C. Jenks, William S. Evaluation of an Air Cleaning Device Equipped with Filtration and UV: Comparison of Removal Efficiency on Particulate Matter and Viable Airborne Bacteria in the Inlet and Treated Air |
title | Evaluation of an Air Cleaning Device Equipped with Filtration and UV: Comparison of Removal Efficiency on Particulate Matter and Viable Airborne Bacteria in the Inlet and Treated Air |
title_full | Evaluation of an Air Cleaning Device Equipped with Filtration and UV: Comparison of Removal Efficiency on Particulate Matter and Viable Airborne Bacteria in the Inlet and Treated Air |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of an Air Cleaning Device Equipped with Filtration and UV: Comparison of Removal Efficiency on Particulate Matter and Viable Airborne Bacteria in the Inlet and Treated Air |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of an Air Cleaning Device Equipped with Filtration and UV: Comparison of Removal Efficiency on Particulate Matter and Viable Airborne Bacteria in the Inlet and Treated Air |
title_short | Evaluation of an Air Cleaning Device Equipped with Filtration and UV: Comparison of Removal Efficiency on Particulate Matter and Viable Airborne Bacteria in the Inlet and Treated Air |
title_sort | evaluation of an air cleaning device equipped with filtration and uv: comparison of removal efficiency on particulate matter and viable airborne bacteria in the inlet and treated air |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9735963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498208 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316135 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lipeiyang evaluationofanaircleaningdeviceequippedwithfiltrationanduvcomparisonofremovalefficiencyonparticulatematterandviableairbornebacteriaintheinletandtreatedair AT kozieljaceka evaluationofanaircleaningdeviceequippedwithfiltrationanduvcomparisonofremovalefficiencyonparticulatematterandviableairbornebacteriaintheinletandtreatedair AT macedonubia evaluationofanaircleaningdeviceequippedwithfiltrationanduvcomparisonofremovalefficiencyonparticulatematterandviableairbornebacteriaintheinletandtreatedair AT zimmermanjeffreyj evaluationofanaircleaningdeviceequippedwithfiltrationanduvcomparisonofremovalefficiencyonparticulatematterandviableairbornebacteriaintheinletandtreatedair AT wrzesinskidanielle evaluationofanaircleaningdeviceequippedwithfiltrationanduvcomparisonofremovalefficiencyonparticulatematterandviableairbornebacteriaintheinletandtreatedair AT sobotkaerin evaluationofanaircleaningdeviceequippedwithfiltrationanduvcomparisonofremovalefficiencyonparticulatematterandviableairbornebacteriaintheinletandtreatedair AT balderasmateo evaluationofanaircleaningdeviceequippedwithfiltrationanduvcomparisonofremovalefficiencyonparticulatematterandviableairbornebacteriaintheinletandtreatedair AT walzwilliamb evaluationofanaircleaningdeviceequippedwithfiltrationanduvcomparisonofremovalefficiencyonparticulatematterandviableairbornebacteriaintheinletandtreatedair AT parisreidvincent evaluationofanaircleaningdeviceequippedwithfiltrationanduvcomparisonofremovalefficiencyonparticulatematterandviableairbornebacteriaintheinletandtreatedair AT leemyeongseong evaluationofanaircleaningdeviceequippedwithfiltrationanduvcomparisonofremovalefficiencyonparticulatematterandviableairbornebacteriaintheinletandtreatedair AT liudongjie evaluationofanaircleaningdeviceequippedwithfiltrationanduvcomparisonofremovalefficiencyonparticulatematterandviableairbornebacteriaintheinletandtreatedair AT yedilbayevbauyrzhan evaluationofanaircleaningdeviceequippedwithfiltrationanduvcomparisonofremovalefficiencyonparticulatematterandviableairbornebacteriaintheinletandtreatedair AT ramirezbrettc evaluationofanaircleaningdeviceequippedwithfiltrationanduvcomparisonofremovalefficiencyonparticulatematterandviableairbornebacteriaintheinletandtreatedair AT jenkswilliams evaluationofanaircleaningdeviceequippedwithfiltrationanduvcomparisonofremovalefficiencyonparticulatematterandviableairbornebacteriaintheinletandtreatedair |