Cargando…

Evaluation of an Air Cleaning Device Equipped with Filtration and UV: Comparison of Removal Efficiency on Particulate Matter and Viable Airborne Bacteria in the Inlet and Treated Air

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, improving indoor air quality (IAQ) has become vital for the public as COVID-19 and other infectious diseases can transmit via inhalable aerosols. Air cleaning devices with filtration and targeted pollutant treatment capabilities can help improve IAQ. However, only a few...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Peiyang, Koziel, Jacek A., Macedo, Nubia, Zimmerman, Jeffrey J., Wrzesinski, Danielle, Sobotka, Erin, Balderas, Mateo, Walz, William B., Paris, Reid Vincent, Lee, Myeongseong, Liu, Dongjie, Yedilbayev, Bauyrzhan, Ramirez, Brett C., Jenks, William S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9735963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498208
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316135
_version_ 1784846903344627712
author Li, Peiyang
Koziel, Jacek A.
Macedo, Nubia
Zimmerman, Jeffrey J.
Wrzesinski, Danielle
Sobotka, Erin
Balderas, Mateo
Walz, William B.
Paris, Reid Vincent
Lee, Myeongseong
Liu, Dongjie
Yedilbayev, Bauyrzhan
Ramirez, Brett C.
Jenks, William S.
author_facet Li, Peiyang
Koziel, Jacek A.
Macedo, Nubia
Zimmerman, Jeffrey J.
Wrzesinski, Danielle
Sobotka, Erin
Balderas, Mateo
Walz, William B.
Paris, Reid Vincent
Lee, Myeongseong
Liu, Dongjie
Yedilbayev, Bauyrzhan
Ramirez, Brett C.
Jenks, William S.
author_sort Li, Peiyang
collection PubMed
description Since the COVID-19 pandemic, improving indoor air quality (IAQ) has become vital for the public as COVID-19 and other infectious diseases can transmit via inhalable aerosols. Air cleaning devices with filtration and targeted pollutant treatment capabilities can help improve IAQ. However, only a few filtration/UV devices have been formally tested for their effectiveness, and little data is publicly available and UV doses comparable. In this research, we upgraded a particulate matter (PM) air filtration prototype by adding UV-C (germicidal) light. We developed realistic UV dose metrics for fast-moving air and selected performance scenarios to quantify the mitigation effect on viable airborne bacteria and PM. The targeted PM included total suspended particulate (TSP) and a coarse-to-fine range sized at PM(10), PM(4), PM(2.5), and PM(1). The PM and viable airborne bacteria concentrations were compared between the inlet and outlet of the prototype at 0.5 and 1.0 m(3)/s (low and high) air flow modes. The upgraded prototype inactivated nearly 100% of viable airborne bacteria and removed up to 97% of TSP, 91% of PM(10), 87% of PM(4), 87% of PM(2.5), and 88% of PM(1). The performance in the low flow rate mode was generally better than in the high flow rate mode. The combination of filtration and UV-C treatment provided ‘double-barrier’ assurance for air purification and lowered the risk of spreading infectious micro-organisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9735963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97359632022-12-11 Evaluation of an Air Cleaning Device Equipped with Filtration and UV: Comparison of Removal Efficiency on Particulate Matter and Viable Airborne Bacteria in the Inlet and Treated Air Li, Peiyang Koziel, Jacek A. Macedo, Nubia Zimmerman, Jeffrey J. Wrzesinski, Danielle Sobotka, Erin Balderas, Mateo Walz, William B. Paris, Reid Vincent Lee, Myeongseong Liu, Dongjie Yedilbayev, Bauyrzhan Ramirez, Brett C. Jenks, William S. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Since the COVID-19 pandemic, improving indoor air quality (IAQ) has become vital for the public as COVID-19 and other infectious diseases can transmit via inhalable aerosols. Air cleaning devices with filtration and targeted pollutant treatment capabilities can help improve IAQ. However, only a few filtration/UV devices have been formally tested for their effectiveness, and little data is publicly available and UV doses comparable. In this research, we upgraded a particulate matter (PM) air filtration prototype by adding UV-C (germicidal) light. We developed realistic UV dose metrics for fast-moving air and selected performance scenarios to quantify the mitigation effect on viable airborne bacteria and PM. The targeted PM included total suspended particulate (TSP) and a coarse-to-fine range sized at PM(10), PM(4), PM(2.5), and PM(1). The PM and viable airborne bacteria concentrations were compared between the inlet and outlet of the prototype at 0.5 and 1.0 m(3)/s (low and high) air flow modes. The upgraded prototype inactivated nearly 100% of viable airborne bacteria and removed up to 97% of TSP, 91% of PM(10), 87% of PM(4), 87% of PM(2.5), and 88% of PM(1). The performance in the low flow rate mode was generally better than in the high flow rate mode. The combination of filtration and UV-C treatment provided ‘double-barrier’ assurance for air purification and lowered the risk of spreading infectious micro-organisms. MDPI 2022-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9735963/ /pubmed/36498208 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316135 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Peiyang
Koziel, Jacek A.
Macedo, Nubia
Zimmerman, Jeffrey J.
Wrzesinski, Danielle
Sobotka, Erin
Balderas, Mateo
Walz, William B.
Paris, Reid Vincent
Lee, Myeongseong
Liu, Dongjie
Yedilbayev, Bauyrzhan
Ramirez, Brett C.
Jenks, William S.
Evaluation of an Air Cleaning Device Equipped with Filtration and UV: Comparison of Removal Efficiency on Particulate Matter and Viable Airborne Bacteria in the Inlet and Treated Air
title Evaluation of an Air Cleaning Device Equipped with Filtration and UV: Comparison of Removal Efficiency on Particulate Matter and Viable Airborne Bacteria in the Inlet and Treated Air
title_full Evaluation of an Air Cleaning Device Equipped with Filtration and UV: Comparison of Removal Efficiency on Particulate Matter and Viable Airborne Bacteria in the Inlet and Treated Air
title_fullStr Evaluation of an Air Cleaning Device Equipped with Filtration and UV: Comparison of Removal Efficiency on Particulate Matter and Viable Airborne Bacteria in the Inlet and Treated Air
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of an Air Cleaning Device Equipped with Filtration and UV: Comparison of Removal Efficiency on Particulate Matter and Viable Airborne Bacteria in the Inlet and Treated Air
title_short Evaluation of an Air Cleaning Device Equipped with Filtration and UV: Comparison of Removal Efficiency on Particulate Matter and Viable Airborne Bacteria in the Inlet and Treated Air
title_sort evaluation of an air cleaning device equipped with filtration and uv: comparison of removal efficiency on particulate matter and viable airborne bacteria in the inlet and treated air
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9735963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498208
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316135
work_keys_str_mv AT lipeiyang evaluationofanaircleaningdeviceequippedwithfiltrationanduvcomparisonofremovalefficiencyonparticulatematterandviableairbornebacteriaintheinletandtreatedair
AT kozieljaceka evaluationofanaircleaningdeviceequippedwithfiltrationanduvcomparisonofremovalefficiencyonparticulatematterandviableairbornebacteriaintheinletandtreatedair
AT macedonubia evaluationofanaircleaningdeviceequippedwithfiltrationanduvcomparisonofremovalefficiencyonparticulatematterandviableairbornebacteriaintheinletandtreatedair
AT zimmermanjeffreyj evaluationofanaircleaningdeviceequippedwithfiltrationanduvcomparisonofremovalefficiencyonparticulatematterandviableairbornebacteriaintheinletandtreatedair
AT wrzesinskidanielle evaluationofanaircleaningdeviceequippedwithfiltrationanduvcomparisonofremovalefficiencyonparticulatematterandviableairbornebacteriaintheinletandtreatedair
AT sobotkaerin evaluationofanaircleaningdeviceequippedwithfiltrationanduvcomparisonofremovalefficiencyonparticulatematterandviableairbornebacteriaintheinletandtreatedair
AT balderasmateo evaluationofanaircleaningdeviceequippedwithfiltrationanduvcomparisonofremovalefficiencyonparticulatematterandviableairbornebacteriaintheinletandtreatedair
AT walzwilliamb evaluationofanaircleaningdeviceequippedwithfiltrationanduvcomparisonofremovalefficiencyonparticulatematterandviableairbornebacteriaintheinletandtreatedair
AT parisreidvincent evaluationofanaircleaningdeviceequippedwithfiltrationanduvcomparisonofremovalefficiencyonparticulatematterandviableairbornebacteriaintheinletandtreatedair
AT leemyeongseong evaluationofanaircleaningdeviceequippedwithfiltrationanduvcomparisonofremovalefficiencyonparticulatematterandviableairbornebacteriaintheinletandtreatedair
AT liudongjie evaluationofanaircleaningdeviceequippedwithfiltrationanduvcomparisonofremovalefficiencyonparticulatematterandviableairbornebacteriaintheinletandtreatedair
AT yedilbayevbauyrzhan evaluationofanaircleaningdeviceequippedwithfiltrationanduvcomparisonofremovalefficiencyonparticulatematterandviableairbornebacteriaintheinletandtreatedair
AT ramirezbrettc evaluationofanaircleaningdeviceequippedwithfiltrationanduvcomparisonofremovalefficiencyonparticulatematterandviableairbornebacteriaintheinletandtreatedair
AT jenkswilliams evaluationofanaircleaningdeviceequippedwithfiltrationanduvcomparisonofremovalefficiencyonparticulatematterandviableairbornebacteriaintheinletandtreatedair