Cargando…
Turbulent CFD Simulation of Two Rotor-Stator Agitators for High Homogeneity and Liquid Level Stability in Stirred Tank
Good solid-liquid mixing homogeneity and liquid level stability are necessary conditions for the preparation of high-quality composite materials. In this study, two rotor-stator agitators were utilized, including the cross-structure rotor-stator (CSRS) agitator and the half-cross structure rotor-sta...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9736096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36500064 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15238563 |
Sumario: | Good solid-liquid mixing homogeneity and liquid level stability are necessary conditions for the preparation of high-quality composite materials. In this study, two rotor-stator agitators were utilized, including the cross-structure rotor-stator (CSRS) agitator and the half-cross structure rotor-stator (HCSRS) agitator. The performances of the two types of rotor-stator agitators and the conventional A200 (an axial-flow agitator) and Rushton (a radial-flow agitator) in the solid-liquid mixing operations were compared through CFD modeling, including the homogeneity, power consumption and liquid level stability. The Eulerian–Eulerian multi-fluid model coupling with the RNG k–ε turbulence model were used to simulate the granular flow and the turbulence effects. When the optimum solid-liquid mixing homogeneity was achieved in both conventional agitators, further increasing stirring speed would worsen the homogeneity significantly, while the two rotor-stator agitators still achieving good mixing homogeneity at the stirring speed of 600 rpm. The CSRS agitator attained the minimum standard deviation of particle concentration σ of 0.15, which was 42% smaller than that achieved by the A200 agitators. Moreover, the average liquid level velocity corresponding to the minimum σ obtained by the CSRS agitator was 0.31 m/s, which was less than half of those of the other three mixers. |
---|