Cargando…

A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Functional Outcome in Distal Fibula Fractures between Conventional AO Semitubular Plating and Minimal Invasive Intramedullary “Photodynamic Bone Stabilisation”

(1) Background: As age in western populations is rising, so too are fractures, e.g., of the distal fibula. The aim of this study was to find out whether a novel, minimally invasive intramedullary osteosynthesis technique for the treatment of distal fibula fractures in elderly patients results in not...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zyskowski, Michael, Wurm, Markus, Greve, Frederik, Zehnder, Philipp, Pflüger, Patrick, Müller, Michael, Biberthaler, Peter, Kirchhoff, Chlodwig
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9736249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498750
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237178
_version_ 1784846977188495360
author Zyskowski, Michael
Wurm, Markus
Greve, Frederik
Zehnder, Philipp
Pflüger, Patrick
Müller, Michael
Biberthaler, Peter
Kirchhoff, Chlodwig
author_facet Zyskowski, Michael
Wurm, Markus
Greve, Frederik
Zehnder, Philipp
Pflüger, Patrick
Müller, Michael
Biberthaler, Peter
Kirchhoff, Chlodwig
author_sort Zyskowski, Michael
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: As age in western populations is rising, so too are fractures, e.g., of the distal fibula. The aim of this study was to find out whether a novel, minimally invasive intramedullary osteosynthesis technique for the treatment of distal fibula fractures in elderly patients results in not only a reduction of postoperative complications, but also a shorter hospitalization time, an improved clinical outcome, and preserved autonomy in geriatric trauma patients. (2) Methods: In this prospective study, the results following surgical treatment for distal fibula fractures in geriatric patients after using DePuy Synthes(®) one-third semitubular plate (Group I) or a minimally invasive intramedullary photodynamic Bone StabilizationSystem (IlluminOss(®)) (Group II) were compared at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after initial treatment. (3) Results: Significant improvement regarding clinical outcome was shown in Group II 6 and 12 weeks after surgery. (4) Conclusions: Our study results demonstrate that the use of this new intramedullary stabilization system in combination with an immediate postoperative weight bearing seems to be a safe and stable treatment option for ankle fractures in geriatric patients, especially in the early stages of recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9736249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97362492022-12-11 A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Functional Outcome in Distal Fibula Fractures between Conventional AO Semitubular Plating and Minimal Invasive Intramedullary “Photodynamic Bone Stabilisation” Zyskowski, Michael Wurm, Markus Greve, Frederik Zehnder, Philipp Pflüger, Patrick Müller, Michael Biberthaler, Peter Kirchhoff, Chlodwig J Clin Med Article (1) Background: As age in western populations is rising, so too are fractures, e.g., of the distal fibula. The aim of this study was to find out whether a novel, minimally invasive intramedullary osteosynthesis technique for the treatment of distal fibula fractures in elderly patients results in not only a reduction of postoperative complications, but also a shorter hospitalization time, an improved clinical outcome, and preserved autonomy in geriatric trauma patients. (2) Methods: In this prospective study, the results following surgical treatment for distal fibula fractures in geriatric patients after using DePuy Synthes(®) one-third semitubular plate (Group I) or a minimally invasive intramedullary photodynamic Bone StabilizationSystem (IlluminOss(®)) (Group II) were compared at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after initial treatment. (3) Results: Significant improvement regarding clinical outcome was shown in Group II 6 and 12 weeks after surgery. (4) Conclusions: Our study results demonstrate that the use of this new intramedullary stabilization system in combination with an immediate postoperative weight bearing seems to be a safe and stable treatment option for ankle fractures in geriatric patients, especially in the early stages of recovery. MDPI 2022-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9736249/ /pubmed/36498750 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237178 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zyskowski, Michael
Wurm, Markus
Greve, Frederik
Zehnder, Philipp
Pflüger, Patrick
Müller, Michael
Biberthaler, Peter
Kirchhoff, Chlodwig
A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Functional Outcome in Distal Fibula Fractures between Conventional AO Semitubular Plating and Minimal Invasive Intramedullary “Photodynamic Bone Stabilisation”
title A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Functional Outcome in Distal Fibula Fractures between Conventional AO Semitubular Plating and Minimal Invasive Intramedullary “Photodynamic Bone Stabilisation”
title_full A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Functional Outcome in Distal Fibula Fractures between Conventional AO Semitubular Plating and Minimal Invasive Intramedullary “Photodynamic Bone Stabilisation”
title_fullStr A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Functional Outcome in Distal Fibula Fractures between Conventional AO Semitubular Plating and Minimal Invasive Intramedullary “Photodynamic Bone Stabilisation”
title_full_unstemmed A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Functional Outcome in Distal Fibula Fractures between Conventional AO Semitubular Plating and Minimal Invasive Intramedullary “Photodynamic Bone Stabilisation”
title_short A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Functional Outcome in Distal Fibula Fractures between Conventional AO Semitubular Plating and Minimal Invasive Intramedullary “Photodynamic Bone Stabilisation”
title_sort prospective randomized study comparing functional outcome in distal fibula fractures between conventional ao semitubular plating and minimal invasive intramedullary “photodynamic bone stabilisation”
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9736249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498750
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237178
work_keys_str_mv AT zyskowskimichael aprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation
AT wurmmarkus aprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation
AT grevefrederik aprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation
AT zehnderphilipp aprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation
AT pflugerpatrick aprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation
AT mullermichael aprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation
AT biberthalerpeter aprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation
AT kirchhoffchlodwig aprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation
AT zyskowskimichael prospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation
AT wurmmarkus prospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation
AT grevefrederik prospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation
AT zehnderphilipp prospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation
AT pflugerpatrick prospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation
AT mullermichael prospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation
AT biberthalerpeter prospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation
AT kirchhoffchlodwig prospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation