Cargando…
A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Functional Outcome in Distal Fibula Fractures between Conventional AO Semitubular Plating and Minimal Invasive Intramedullary “Photodynamic Bone Stabilisation”
(1) Background: As age in western populations is rising, so too are fractures, e.g., of the distal fibula. The aim of this study was to find out whether a novel, minimally invasive intramedullary osteosynthesis technique for the treatment of distal fibula fractures in elderly patients results in not...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9736249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498750 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237178 |
_version_ | 1784846977188495360 |
---|---|
author | Zyskowski, Michael Wurm, Markus Greve, Frederik Zehnder, Philipp Pflüger, Patrick Müller, Michael Biberthaler, Peter Kirchhoff, Chlodwig |
author_facet | Zyskowski, Michael Wurm, Markus Greve, Frederik Zehnder, Philipp Pflüger, Patrick Müller, Michael Biberthaler, Peter Kirchhoff, Chlodwig |
author_sort | Zyskowski, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | (1) Background: As age in western populations is rising, so too are fractures, e.g., of the distal fibula. The aim of this study was to find out whether a novel, minimally invasive intramedullary osteosynthesis technique for the treatment of distal fibula fractures in elderly patients results in not only a reduction of postoperative complications, but also a shorter hospitalization time, an improved clinical outcome, and preserved autonomy in geriatric trauma patients. (2) Methods: In this prospective study, the results following surgical treatment for distal fibula fractures in geriatric patients after using DePuy Synthes(®) one-third semitubular plate (Group I) or a minimally invasive intramedullary photodynamic Bone StabilizationSystem (IlluminOss(®)) (Group II) were compared at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after initial treatment. (3) Results: Significant improvement regarding clinical outcome was shown in Group II 6 and 12 weeks after surgery. (4) Conclusions: Our study results demonstrate that the use of this new intramedullary stabilization system in combination with an immediate postoperative weight bearing seems to be a safe and stable treatment option for ankle fractures in geriatric patients, especially in the early stages of recovery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9736249 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97362492022-12-11 A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Functional Outcome in Distal Fibula Fractures between Conventional AO Semitubular Plating and Minimal Invasive Intramedullary “Photodynamic Bone Stabilisation” Zyskowski, Michael Wurm, Markus Greve, Frederik Zehnder, Philipp Pflüger, Patrick Müller, Michael Biberthaler, Peter Kirchhoff, Chlodwig J Clin Med Article (1) Background: As age in western populations is rising, so too are fractures, e.g., of the distal fibula. The aim of this study was to find out whether a novel, minimally invasive intramedullary osteosynthesis technique for the treatment of distal fibula fractures in elderly patients results in not only a reduction of postoperative complications, but also a shorter hospitalization time, an improved clinical outcome, and preserved autonomy in geriatric trauma patients. (2) Methods: In this prospective study, the results following surgical treatment for distal fibula fractures in geriatric patients after using DePuy Synthes(®) one-third semitubular plate (Group I) or a minimally invasive intramedullary photodynamic Bone StabilizationSystem (IlluminOss(®)) (Group II) were compared at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after initial treatment. (3) Results: Significant improvement regarding clinical outcome was shown in Group II 6 and 12 weeks after surgery. (4) Conclusions: Our study results demonstrate that the use of this new intramedullary stabilization system in combination with an immediate postoperative weight bearing seems to be a safe and stable treatment option for ankle fractures in geriatric patients, especially in the early stages of recovery. MDPI 2022-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9736249/ /pubmed/36498750 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237178 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zyskowski, Michael Wurm, Markus Greve, Frederik Zehnder, Philipp Pflüger, Patrick Müller, Michael Biberthaler, Peter Kirchhoff, Chlodwig A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Functional Outcome in Distal Fibula Fractures between Conventional AO Semitubular Plating and Minimal Invasive Intramedullary “Photodynamic Bone Stabilisation” |
title | A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Functional Outcome in Distal Fibula Fractures between Conventional AO Semitubular Plating and Minimal Invasive Intramedullary “Photodynamic Bone Stabilisation” |
title_full | A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Functional Outcome in Distal Fibula Fractures between Conventional AO Semitubular Plating and Minimal Invasive Intramedullary “Photodynamic Bone Stabilisation” |
title_fullStr | A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Functional Outcome in Distal Fibula Fractures between Conventional AO Semitubular Plating and Minimal Invasive Intramedullary “Photodynamic Bone Stabilisation” |
title_full_unstemmed | A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Functional Outcome in Distal Fibula Fractures between Conventional AO Semitubular Plating and Minimal Invasive Intramedullary “Photodynamic Bone Stabilisation” |
title_short | A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Functional Outcome in Distal Fibula Fractures between Conventional AO Semitubular Plating and Minimal Invasive Intramedullary “Photodynamic Bone Stabilisation” |
title_sort | prospective randomized study comparing functional outcome in distal fibula fractures between conventional ao semitubular plating and minimal invasive intramedullary “photodynamic bone stabilisation” |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9736249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498750 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237178 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zyskowskimichael aprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation AT wurmmarkus aprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation AT grevefrederik aprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation AT zehnderphilipp aprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation AT pflugerpatrick aprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation AT mullermichael aprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation AT biberthalerpeter aprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation AT kirchhoffchlodwig aprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation AT zyskowskimichael prospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation AT wurmmarkus prospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation AT grevefrederik prospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation AT zehnderphilipp prospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation AT pflugerpatrick prospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation AT mullermichael prospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation AT biberthalerpeter prospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation AT kirchhoffchlodwig prospectiverandomizedstudycomparingfunctionaloutcomeindistalfibulafracturesbetweenconventionalaosemitubularplatingandminimalinvasiveintramedullaryphotodynamicbonestabilisation |