Cargando…
Assessing the Content and Quality of Digital Tools for Managing Gestational Weight Gain: Systematic Search and Evaluation
BACKGROUND: Digital health resources have the potential to assist women in optimizing gestational weight gain (GWG) during pregnancy to improve maternal health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the quality and behavior change potential of publicly available digital tools (webs...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9736757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36427237 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/37552 |
_version_ | 1784847112963358720 |
---|---|
author | Brammall, Bonnie R Garad, Rhonda M Boyle, Jacqueline A Hayman, Melanie J de Jersey, Susan J Teede, Helena J Hong, Quoc V Carrandi, Alayna Harrison, Cheryce L |
author_facet | Brammall, Bonnie R Garad, Rhonda M Boyle, Jacqueline A Hayman, Melanie J de Jersey, Susan J Teede, Helena J Hong, Quoc V Carrandi, Alayna Harrison, Cheryce L |
author_sort | Brammall, Bonnie R |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Digital health resources have the potential to assist women in optimizing gestational weight gain (GWG) during pregnancy to improve maternal health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the quality and behavior change potential of publicly available digital tools (websites and apps) that facilitate GWG tracking. METHODS: Digital tools were identified using key search terms across website search engines and app stores and evaluated using the Mobile App Rating Scale, the App Behavior Change Scale, as well as criteria to evaluate the rigor and safety of GWG information. RESULTS: Overall, 1085 tools were screened for inclusion (162 websites and 923 apps), and 19 were deemed eligible. The mean Mobile App Rating Scale quality score was 3.31 (SD 0.53) out of 5, ranging from 2.26 to 4.39, and the mean App Behavior Change Scale score was 6 (SD 3.4) out of 21, ranging from 19 to 0. Of the 19 items used to evaluate rigor of GWG advice, most tools (n=11, 57.9%) contained ≤3 items. CONCLUSIONS: This review emphasizes the substantial limitations in current digital resources promoting the monitoring and optimization of GWG. Most tools were of low quality, had minimal behavior change potential, and were potentially unsafe, with minimal linkage to evidence-based information or partnership with health care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9736757 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97367572022-12-11 Assessing the Content and Quality of Digital Tools for Managing Gestational Weight Gain: Systematic Search and Evaluation Brammall, Bonnie R Garad, Rhonda M Boyle, Jacqueline A Hayman, Melanie J de Jersey, Susan J Teede, Helena J Hong, Quoc V Carrandi, Alayna Harrison, Cheryce L J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Digital health resources have the potential to assist women in optimizing gestational weight gain (GWG) during pregnancy to improve maternal health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the quality and behavior change potential of publicly available digital tools (websites and apps) that facilitate GWG tracking. METHODS: Digital tools were identified using key search terms across website search engines and app stores and evaluated using the Mobile App Rating Scale, the App Behavior Change Scale, as well as criteria to evaluate the rigor and safety of GWG information. RESULTS: Overall, 1085 tools were screened for inclusion (162 websites and 923 apps), and 19 were deemed eligible. The mean Mobile App Rating Scale quality score was 3.31 (SD 0.53) out of 5, ranging from 2.26 to 4.39, and the mean App Behavior Change Scale score was 6 (SD 3.4) out of 21, ranging from 19 to 0. Of the 19 items used to evaluate rigor of GWG advice, most tools (n=11, 57.9%) contained ≤3 items. CONCLUSIONS: This review emphasizes the substantial limitations in current digital resources promoting the monitoring and optimization of GWG. Most tools were of low quality, had minimal behavior change potential, and were potentially unsafe, with minimal linkage to evidence-based information or partnership with health care. JMIR Publications 2022-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9736757/ /pubmed/36427237 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/37552 Text en ©Bonnie R Brammall, Rhonda M Garad, Jacqueline A Boyle, Melanie J Hayman, Susan J de Jersey, Helena J Teede, Quoc V Hong, Alayna Carrandi, Cheryce L Harrison. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 25.11.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Brammall, Bonnie R Garad, Rhonda M Boyle, Jacqueline A Hayman, Melanie J de Jersey, Susan J Teede, Helena J Hong, Quoc V Carrandi, Alayna Harrison, Cheryce L Assessing the Content and Quality of Digital Tools for Managing Gestational Weight Gain: Systematic Search and Evaluation |
title | Assessing the Content and Quality of Digital Tools for Managing Gestational Weight Gain: Systematic Search and Evaluation |
title_full | Assessing the Content and Quality of Digital Tools for Managing Gestational Weight Gain: Systematic Search and Evaluation |
title_fullStr | Assessing the Content and Quality of Digital Tools for Managing Gestational Weight Gain: Systematic Search and Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the Content and Quality of Digital Tools for Managing Gestational Weight Gain: Systematic Search and Evaluation |
title_short | Assessing the Content and Quality of Digital Tools for Managing Gestational Weight Gain: Systematic Search and Evaluation |
title_sort | assessing the content and quality of digital tools for managing gestational weight gain: systematic search and evaluation |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9736757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36427237 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/37552 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brammallbonnier assessingthecontentandqualityofdigitaltoolsformanaginggestationalweightgainsystematicsearchandevaluation AT garadrhondam assessingthecontentandqualityofdigitaltoolsformanaginggestationalweightgainsystematicsearchandevaluation AT boylejacquelinea assessingthecontentandqualityofdigitaltoolsformanaginggestationalweightgainsystematicsearchandevaluation AT haymanmelaniej assessingthecontentandqualityofdigitaltoolsformanaginggestationalweightgainsystematicsearchandevaluation AT dejerseysusanj assessingthecontentandqualityofdigitaltoolsformanaginggestationalweightgainsystematicsearchandevaluation AT teedehelenaj assessingthecontentandqualityofdigitaltoolsformanaginggestationalweightgainsystematicsearchandevaluation AT hongquocv assessingthecontentandqualityofdigitaltoolsformanaginggestationalweightgainsystematicsearchandevaluation AT carrandialayna assessingthecontentandqualityofdigitaltoolsformanaginggestationalweightgainsystematicsearchandevaluation AT harrisoncherycel assessingthecontentandqualityofdigitaltoolsformanaginggestationalweightgainsystematicsearchandevaluation |