Cargando…

Assessing the Content and Quality of Digital Tools for Managing Gestational Weight Gain: Systematic Search and Evaluation

BACKGROUND: Digital health resources have the potential to assist women in optimizing gestational weight gain (GWG) during pregnancy to improve maternal health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the quality and behavior change potential of publicly available digital tools (webs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brammall, Bonnie R, Garad, Rhonda M, Boyle, Jacqueline A, Hayman, Melanie J, de Jersey, Susan J, Teede, Helena J, Hong, Quoc V, Carrandi, Alayna, Harrison, Cheryce L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9736757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36427237
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/37552
_version_ 1784847112963358720
author Brammall, Bonnie R
Garad, Rhonda M
Boyle, Jacqueline A
Hayman, Melanie J
de Jersey, Susan J
Teede, Helena J
Hong, Quoc V
Carrandi, Alayna
Harrison, Cheryce L
author_facet Brammall, Bonnie R
Garad, Rhonda M
Boyle, Jacqueline A
Hayman, Melanie J
de Jersey, Susan J
Teede, Helena J
Hong, Quoc V
Carrandi, Alayna
Harrison, Cheryce L
author_sort Brammall, Bonnie R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Digital health resources have the potential to assist women in optimizing gestational weight gain (GWG) during pregnancy to improve maternal health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the quality and behavior change potential of publicly available digital tools (websites and apps) that facilitate GWG tracking. METHODS: Digital tools were identified using key search terms across website search engines and app stores and evaluated using the Mobile App Rating Scale, the App Behavior Change Scale, as well as criteria to evaluate the rigor and safety of GWG information. RESULTS: Overall, 1085 tools were screened for inclusion (162 websites and 923 apps), and 19 were deemed eligible. The mean Mobile App Rating Scale quality score was 3.31 (SD 0.53) out of 5, ranging from 2.26 to 4.39, and the mean App Behavior Change Scale score was 6 (SD 3.4) out of 21, ranging from 19 to 0. Of the 19 items used to evaluate rigor of GWG advice, most tools (n=11, 57.9%) contained ≤3 items. CONCLUSIONS: This review emphasizes the substantial limitations in current digital resources promoting the monitoring and optimization of GWG. Most tools were of low quality, had minimal behavior change potential, and were potentially unsafe, with minimal linkage to evidence-based information or partnership with health care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9736757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97367572022-12-11 Assessing the Content and Quality of Digital Tools for Managing Gestational Weight Gain: Systematic Search and Evaluation Brammall, Bonnie R Garad, Rhonda M Boyle, Jacqueline A Hayman, Melanie J de Jersey, Susan J Teede, Helena J Hong, Quoc V Carrandi, Alayna Harrison, Cheryce L J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Digital health resources have the potential to assist women in optimizing gestational weight gain (GWG) during pregnancy to improve maternal health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the quality and behavior change potential of publicly available digital tools (websites and apps) that facilitate GWG tracking. METHODS: Digital tools were identified using key search terms across website search engines and app stores and evaluated using the Mobile App Rating Scale, the App Behavior Change Scale, as well as criteria to evaluate the rigor and safety of GWG information. RESULTS: Overall, 1085 tools were screened for inclusion (162 websites and 923 apps), and 19 were deemed eligible. The mean Mobile App Rating Scale quality score was 3.31 (SD 0.53) out of 5, ranging from 2.26 to 4.39, and the mean App Behavior Change Scale score was 6 (SD 3.4) out of 21, ranging from 19 to 0. Of the 19 items used to evaluate rigor of GWG advice, most tools (n=11, 57.9%) contained ≤3 items. CONCLUSIONS: This review emphasizes the substantial limitations in current digital resources promoting the monitoring and optimization of GWG. Most tools were of low quality, had minimal behavior change potential, and were potentially unsafe, with minimal linkage to evidence-based information or partnership with health care. JMIR Publications 2022-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9736757/ /pubmed/36427237 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/37552 Text en ©Bonnie R Brammall, Rhonda M Garad, Jacqueline A Boyle, Melanie J Hayman, Susan J de Jersey, Helena J Teede, Quoc V Hong, Alayna Carrandi, Cheryce L Harrison. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 25.11.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Brammall, Bonnie R
Garad, Rhonda M
Boyle, Jacqueline A
Hayman, Melanie J
de Jersey, Susan J
Teede, Helena J
Hong, Quoc V
Carrandi, Alayna
Harrison, Cheryce L
Assessing the Content and Quality of Digital Tools for Managing Gestational Weight Gain: Systematic Search and Evaluation
title Assessing the Content and Quality of Digital Tools for Managing Gestational Weight Gain: Systematic Search and Evaluation
title_full Assessing the Content and Quality of Digital Tools for Managing Gestational Weight Gain: Systematic Search and Evaluation
title_fullStr Assessing the Content and Quality of Digital Tools for Managing Gestational Weight Gain: Systematic Search and Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Content and Quality of Digital Tools for Managing Gestational Weight Gain: Systematic Search and Evaluation
title_short Assessing the Content and Quality of Digital Tools for Managing Gestational Weight Gain: Systematic Search and Evaluation
title_sort assessing the content and quality of digital tools for managing gestational weight gain: systematic search and evaluation
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9736757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36427237
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/37552
work_keys_str_mv AT brammallbonnier assessingthecontentandqualityofdigitaltoolsformanaginggestationalweightgainsystematicsearchandevaluation
AT garadrhondam assessingthecontentandqualityofdigitaltoolsformanaginggestationalweightgainsystematicsearchandevaluation
AT boylejacquelinea assessingthecontentandqualityofdigitaltoolsformanaginggestationalweightgainsystematicsearchandevaluation
AT haymanmelaniej assessingthecontentandqualityofdigitaltoolsformanaginggestationalweightgainsystematicsearchandevaluation
AT dejerseysusanj assessingthecontentandqualityofdigitaltoolsformanaginggestationalweightgainsystematicsearchandevaluation
AT teedehelenaj assessingthecontentandqualityofdigitaltoolsformanaginggestationalweightgainsystematicsearchandevaluation
AT hongquocv assessingthecontentandqualityofdigitaltoolsformanaginggestationalweightgainsystematicsearchandevaluation
AT carrandialayna assessingthecontentandqualityofdigitaltoolsformanaginggestationalweightgainsystematicsearchandevaluation
AT harrisoncherycel assessingthecontentandqualityofdigitaltoolsformanaginggestationalweightgainsystematicsearchandevaluation