Cargando…

Midterm results after seamless patch mitral reconstruction

OBJECTIVES: Some pathologies, including infective endocarditis or sclerotic changes of the mitral leaflet, make the conventional mitral valve repair challenging. Our previously described technique for reconstruction with a seamless pericardial patch makes the repair feasible in some of such difficul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hosoba, Soh, Ito, Toshiaki, Mori, Makoto, Kato, Riku, Kobayashi, Masaaki, Nakai, Yuji, Morishita, Yoshihiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9737040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36510531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.10.006
_version_ 1784847185483923456
author Hosoba, Soh
Ito, Toshiaki
Mori, Makoto
Kato, Riku
Kobayashi, Masaaki
Nakai, Yuji
Morishita, Yoshihiro
author_facet Hosoba, Soh
Ito, Toshiaki
Mori, Makoto
Kato, Riku
Kobayashi, Masaaki
Nakai, Yuji
Morishita, Yoshihiro
author_sort Hosoba, Soh
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Some pathologies, including infective endocarditis or sclerotic changes of the mitral leaflet, make the conventional mitral valve repair challenging. Our previously described technique for reconstruction with a seamless pericardial patch makes the repair feasible in some of such difficult pathologies. However, the extent of mitral leaflet segments that could be safely repaired using this technique remains unknown. We investigated the association between the midterm outcome and the extent of mitral leaflet segments replaced by a pericardial patch. METHODS: From January 2009 to January 2022, patients who underwent mitral valve repair with the seamless 1-patch reconstruction technique were included. The glutaraldehyde-treated pericardium was trimmed and anchored at the papillary muscle. The edge was sewn to the leaflet and the annulus. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients (aged 60 ± 15 years) underwent mitral valve repair with this technique. The totally endoscopic approach was used in 27 patients (55%). No patient's repair was converted to valve replacement. No operative mortality or disabling stroke was observed during the early postoperative period. In the midterm follow-up, redo surgery was required in 9 patients (18%). Freedom from mitral valve reintervention rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 84%, 82%, and 82% for all patients, respectively. Freedom from reoperation at 5 years was 100%, 92%, and 46% for commissural lesion, 1- to 2-segment involvement, and 3-segment involvement, respectively. There was a significant difference among the 3 groups with regard to mitral valve reoperation rate (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Mitral valve seamless patch reconstruction provides excellent midterm results if applied to commissural lesions or lesions involving up to 2 segments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9737040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97370402022-12-11 Midterm results after seamless patch mitral reconstruction Hosoba, Soh Ito, Toshiaki Mori, Makoto Kato, Riku Kobayashi, Masaaki Nakai, Yuji Morishita, Yoshihiro JTCVS Tech Adult: Mitral Valve OBJECTIVES: Some pathologies, including infective endocarditis or sclerotic changes of the mitral leaflet, make the conventional mitral valve repair challenging. Our previously described technique for reconstruction with a seamless pericardial patch makes the repair feasible in some of such difficult pathologies. However, the extent of mitral leaflet segments that could be safely repaired using this technique remains unknown. We investigated the association between the midterm outcome and the extent of mitral leaflet segments replaced by a pericardial patch. METHODS: From January 2009 to January 2022, patients who underwent mitral valve repair with the seamless 1-patch reconstruction technique were included. The glutaraldehyde-treated pericardium was trimmed and anchored at the papillary muscle. The edge was sewn to the leaflet and the annulus. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients (aged 60 ± 15 years) underwent mitral valve repair with this technique. The totally endoscopic approach was used in 27 patients (55%). No patient's repair was converted to valve replacement. No operative mortality or disabling stroke was observed during the early postoperative period. In the midterm follow-up, redo surgery was required in 9 patients (18%). Freedom from mitral valve reintervention rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 84%, 82%, and 82% for all patients, respectively. Freedom from reoperation at 5 years was 100%, 92%, and 46% for commissural lesion, 1- to 2-segment involvement, and 3-segment involvement, respectively. There was a significant difference among the 3 groups with regard to mitral valve reoperation rate (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Mitral valve seamless patch reconstruction provides excellent midterm results if applied to commissural lesions or lesions involving up to 2 segments. Elsevier 2022-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9737040/ /pubmed/36510531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.10.006 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Adult: Mitral Valve
Hosoba, Soh
Ito, Toshiaki
Mori, Makoto
Kato, Riku
Kobayashi, Masaaki
Nakai, Yuji
Morishita, Yoshihiro
Midterm results after seamless patch mitral reconstruction
title Midterm results after seamless patch mitral reconstruction
title_full Midterm results after seamless patch mitral reconstruction
title_fullStr Midterm results after seamless patch mitral reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Midterm results after seamless patch mitral reconstruction
title_short Midterm results after seamless patch mitral reconstruction
title_sort midterm results after seamless patch mitral reconstruction
topic Adult: Mitral Valve
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9737040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36510531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.10.006
work_keys_str_mv AT hosobasoh midtermresultsafterseamlesspatchmitralreconstruction
AT itotoshiaki midtermresultsafterseamlesspatchmitralreconstruction
AT morimakoto midtermresultsafterseamlesspatchmitralreconstruction
AT katoriku midtermresultsafterseamlesspatchmitralreconstruction
AT kobayashimasaaki midtermresultsafterseamlesspatchmitralreconstruction
AT nakaiyuji midtermresultsafterseamlesspatchmitralreconstruction
AT morishitayoshihiro midtermresultsafterseamlesspatchmitralreconstruction