Cargando…

Machine Learning Model Development and Validation for Predicting Outcome in Stage 4 Solid Cancer Patients with Septic Shock Visiting the Emergency Department: A Multi-Center, Prospective Cohort Study

A reliable prognostic score for minimizing futile treatments in advanced cancer patients with septic shock is rare. A machine learning (ML) model to classify the risk of advanced cancer patients with septic shock is proposed and compared with the existing scoring systems. A multi-center, retrospecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ko, Byuk Sung, Jeon, Sanghoon, Son, Donghee, Choi, Sung-Hyuk, Shin, Tae Gun, Jo, You Hwan, Ryoo, Seung Mok, Kim, Youn-Jung, Park, Yoo Seok, Kwon, Woon Yong, Suh, Gil Joon, Lim, Tae Ho, Kim, Won Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9737041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498805
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237231
_version_ 1784847185785913344
author Ko, Byuk Sung
Jeon, Sanghoon
Son, Donghee
Choi, Sung-Hyuk
Shin, Tae Gun
Jo, You Hwan
Ryoo, Seung Mok
Kim, Youn-Jung
Park, Yoo Seok
Kwon, Woon Yong
Suh, Gil Joon
Lim, Tae Ho
Kim, Won Young
author_facet Ko, Byuk Sung
Jeon, Sanghoon
Son, Donghee
Choi, Sung-Hyuk
Shin, Tae Gun
Jo, You Hwan
Ryoo, Seung Mok
Kim, Youn-Jung
Park, Yoo Seok
Kwon, Woon Yong
Suh, Gil Joon
Lim, Tae Ho
Kim, Won Young
author_sort Ko, Byuk Sung
collection PubMed
description A reliable prognostic score for minimizing futile treatments in advanced cancer patients with septic shock is rare. A machine learning (ML) model to classify the risk of advanced cancer patients with septic shock is proposed and compared with the existing scoring systems. A multi-center, retrospective, observational study of the septic shock registry in patients with stage 4 cancer was divided into a training set and a test set in a 7:3 ratio. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. The best ML model was determined using a stratified 10-fold cross-validation in the training set. A total of 897 patients were included, and the 28-day mortality was 26.4%. The best ML model in the training set was balanced random forest (BRF), with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.821 to predict 28-day mortality. The AUC of the BRF to predict the 28-day mortality in the test set was 0.859. The AUC of the BRF was significantly higher than those of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (both p < 0.001). The ML model outperformed the existing scores for predicting 28-day mortality in stage 4 cancer patients with septic shock. However, further studies are needed to improve the prediction algorithm and to validate it in various countries. This model might support clinicians in real-time to adopt appropriate levels of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9737041
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97370412022-12-11 Machine Learning Model Development and Validation for Predicting Outcome in Stage 4 Solid Cancer Patients with Septic Shock Visiting the Emergency Department: A Multi-Center, Prospective Cohort Study Ko, Byuk Sung Jeon, Sanghoon Son, Donghee Choi, Sung-Hyuk Shin, Tae Gun Jo, You Hwan Ryoo, Seung Mok Kim, Youn-Jung Park, Yoo Seok Kwon, Woon Yong Suh, Gil Joon Lim, Tae Ho Kim, Won Young J Clin Med Article A reliable prognostic score for minimizing futile treatments in advanced cancer patients with septic shock is rare. A machine learning (ML) model to classify the risk of advanced cancer patients with septic shock is proposed and compared with the existing scoring systems. A multi-center, retrospective, observational study of the septic shock registry in patients with stage 4 cancer was divided into a training set and a test set in a 7:3 ratio. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. The best ML model was determined using a stratified 10-fold cross-validation in the training set. A total of 897 patients were included, and the 28-day mortality was 26.4%. The best ML model in the training set was balanced random forest (BRF), with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.821 to predict 28-day mortality. The AUC of the BRF to predict the 28-day mortality in the test set was 0.859. The AUC of the BRF was significantly higher than those of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (both p < 0.001). The ML model outperformed the existing scores for predicting 28-day mortality in stage 4 cancer patients with septic shock. However, further studies are needed to improve the prediction algorithm and to validate it in various countries. This model might support clinicians in real-time to adopt appropriate levels of care. MDPI 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9737041/ /pubmed/36498805 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237231 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ko, Byuk Sung
Jeon, Sanghoon
Son, Donghee
Choi, Sung-Hyuk
Shin, Tae Gun
Jo, You Hwan
Ryoo, Seung Mok
Kim, Youn-Jung
Park, Yoo Seok
Kwon, Woon Yong
Suh, Gil Joon
Lim, Tae Ho
Kim, Won Young
Machine Learning Model Development and Validation for Predicting Outcome in Stage 4 Solid Cancer Patients with Septic Shock Visiting the Emergency Department: A Multi-Center, Prospective Cohort Study
title Machine Learning Model Development and Validation for Predicting Outcome in Stage 4 Solid Cancer Patients with Septic Shock Visiting the Emergency Department: A Multi-Center, Prospective Cohort Study
title_full Machine Learning Model Development and Validation for Predicting Outcome in Stage 4 Solid Cancer Patients with Septic Shock Visiting the Emergency Department: A Multi-Center, Prospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Machine Learning Model Development and Validation for Predicting Outcome in Stage 4 Solid Cancer Patients with Septic Shock Visiting the Emergency Department: A Multi-Center, Prospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning Model Development and Validation for Predicting Outcome in Stage 4 Solid Cancer Patients with Septic Shock Visiting the Emergency Department: A Multi-Center, Prospective Cohort Study
title_short Machine Learning Model Development and Validation for Predicting Outcome in Stage 4 Solid Cancer Patients with Septic Shock Visiting the Emergency Department: A Multi-Center, Prospective Cohort Study
title_sort machine learning model development and validation for predicting outcome in stage 4 solid cancer patients with septic shock visiting the emergency department: a multi-center, prospective cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9737041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498805
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237231
work_keys_str_mv AT kobyuksung machinelearningmodeldevelopmentandvalidationforpredictingoutcomeinstage4solidcancerpatientswithsepticshockvisitingtheemergencydepartmentamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT jeonsanghoon machinelearningmodeldevelopmentandvalidationforpredictingoutcomeinstage4solidcancerpatientswithsepticshockvisitingtheemergencydepartmentamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT sondonghee machinelearningmodeldevelopmentandvalidationforpredictingoutcomeinstage4solidcancerpatientswithsepticshockvisitingtheemergencydepartmentamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT choisunghyuk machinelearningmodeldevelopmentandvalidationforpredictingoutcomeinstage4solidcancerpatientswithsepticshockvisitingtheemergencydepartmentamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT shintaegun machinelearningmodeldevelopmentandvalidationforpredictingoutcomeinstage4solidcancerpatientswithsepticshockvisitingtheemergencydepartmentamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT joyouhwan machinelearningmodeldevelopmentandvalidationforpredictingoutcomeinstage4solidcancerpatientswithsepticshockvisitingtheemergencydepartmentamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT ryooseungmok machinelearningmodeldevelopmentandvalidationforpredictingoutcomeinstage4solidcancerpatientswithsepticshockvisitingtheemergencydepartmentamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT kimyounjung machinelearningmodeldevelopmentandvalidationforpredictingoutcomeinstage4solidcancerpatientswithsepticshockvisitingtheemergencydepartmentamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT parkyooseok machinelearningmodeldevelopmentandvalidationforpredictingoutcomeinstage4solidcancerpatientswithsepticshockvisitingtheemergencydepartmentamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT kwonwoonyong machinelearningmodeldevelopmentandvalidationforpredictingoutcomeinstage4solidcancerpatientswithsepticshockvisitingtheemergencydepartmentamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT suhgiljoon machinelearningmodeldevelopmentandvalidationforpredictingoutcomeinstage4solidcancerpatientswithsepticshockvisitingtheemergencydepartmentamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT limtaeho machinelearningmodeldevelopmentandvalidationforpredictingoutcomeinstage4solidcancerpatientswithsepticshockvisitingtheemergencydepartmentamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy
AT kimwonyoung machinelearningmodeldevelopmentandvalidationforpredictingoutcomeinstage4solidcancerpatientswithsepticshockvisitingtheemergencydepartmentamulticenterprospectivecohortstudy