Cargando…
Recovery following Orthognathic Surgery Procedures—A Pilot Study
This study aims at evaluating and categorizing patients’ objective and subjective postoperative recovery symptoms after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery assigning the healing process. The patients were monitored throughout the recovery process, and their symptoms were managed. A prospective, observa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9737144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498101 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316028 |
_version_ | 1784847212345294848 |
---|---|
author | Dinu, Cristian Manea, Avram Tomoiagă, Denisa Băciuț, Mihaela Almășan, Oana Mitre, Andrei Otto Barbur, Ioan Hedeșiu, Mihaela Armencea, Gabriel Opriș, Horia Stoia, Sebastian Tamaș, Tiberiu Băciuț, Grigore Onișor, Florin Bran, Simion |
author_facet | Dinu, Cristian Manea, Avram Tomoiagă, Denisa Băciuț, Mihaela Almășan, Oana Mitre, Andrei Otto Barbur, Ioan Hedeșiu, Mihaela Armencea, Gabriel Opriș, Horia Stoia, Sebastian Tamaș, Tiberiu Băciuț, Grigore Onișor, Florin Bran, Simion |
author_sort | Dinu, Cristian |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aims at evaluating and categorizing patients’ objective and subjective postoperative recovery symptoms after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery assigning the healing process. The patients were monitored throughout the recovery process, and their symptoms were managed. A prospective, observational study was performed. Patients with Class II and III malocclusion (aged 18 to 35) were evaluated and monitored preoperatively, and postoperatively at 48 h, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months postsurgery. A questionnaire was used to assess pain and anesthesia/hypoesthesia. The most common objective and subjective signs that were correlated with the healing process were edema, hematoma, trismus, pain, and anesthesia/hypoesthesia. Edema peaked at 48–72 h postoperatively (distance between eye’s external canthus and gonion, mean difference = 4.53, between tragus and cheilion, mean difference = 7, between tragus and gnathion, mean difference = 4.65, p < 0.001); mouth opening amplitude was significantly decreased during the first two weeks postsurgery (class II, mean difference = 32.42, p = 0.006, class III, mean difference = 44.57, p < 0.001), but it steadily and considerably improved over three months. The nose tended to widen postsurgery. The most severe pain experienced by patients was of medium intensity in the mandibular body, described as pressure, and usually did not spread. Patients were most severely and persistently impacted by anesthesia/hypoesthesia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9737144 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97371442022-12-11 Recovery following Orthognathic Surgery Procedures—A Pilot Study Dinu, Cristian Manea, Avram Tomoiagă, Denisa Băciuț, Mihaela Almășan, Oana Mitre, Andrei Otto Barbur, Ioan Hedeșiu, Mihaela Armencea, Gabriel Opriș, Horia Stoia, Sebastian Tamaș, Tiberiu Băciuț, Grigore Onișor, Florin Bran, Simion Int J Environ Res Public Health Article This study aims at evaluating and categorizing patients’ objective and subjective postoperative recovery symptoms after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery assigning the healing process. The patients were monitored throughout the recovery process, and their symptoms were managed. A prospective, observational study was performed. Patients with Class II and III malocclusion (aged 18 to 35) were evaluated and monitored preoperatively, and postoperatively at 48 h, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months postsurgery. A questionnaire was used to assess pain and anesthesia/hypoesthesia. The most common objective and subjective signs that were correlated with the healing process were edema, hematoma, trismus, pain, and anesthesia/hypoesthesia. Edema peaked at 48–72 h postoperatively (distance between eye’s external canthus and gonion, mean difference = 4.53, between tragus and cheilion, mean difference = 7, between tragus and gnathion, mean difference = 4.65, p < 0.001); mouth opening amplitude was significantly decreased during the first two weeks postsurgery (class II, mean difference = 32.42, p = 0.006, class III, mean difference = 44.57, p < 0.001), but it steadily and considerably improved over three months. The nose tended to widen postsurgery. The most severe pain experienced by patients was of medium intensity in the mandibular body, described as pressure, and usually did not spread. Patients were most severely and persistently impacted by anesthesia/hypoesthesia. MDPI 2022-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9737144/ /pubmed/36498101 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316028 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Dinu, Cristian Manea, Avram Tomoiagă, Denisa Băciuț, Mihaela Almășan, Oana Mitre, Andrei Otto Barbur, Ioan Hedeșiu, Mihaela Armencea, Gabriel Opriș, Horia Stoia, Sebastian Tamaș, Tiberiu Băciuț, Grigore Onișor, Florin Bran, Simion Recovery following Orthognathic Surgery Procedures—A Pilot Study |
title | Recovery following Orthognathic Surgery Procedures—A Pilot Study |
title_full | Recovery following Orthognathic Surgery Procedures—A Pilot Study |
title_fullStr | Recovery following Orthognathic Surgery Procedures—A Pilot Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Recovery following Orthognathic Surgery Procedures—A Pilot Study |
title_short | Recovery following Orthognathic Surgery Procedures—A Pilot Study |
title_sort | recovery following orthognathic surgery procedures—a pilot study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9737144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498101 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316028 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dinucristian recoveryfollowingorthognathicsurgeryproceduresapilotstudy AT maneaavram recoveryfollowingorthognathicsurgeryproceduresapilotstudy AT tomoiagadenisa recoveryfollowingorthognathicsurgeryproceduresapilotstudy AT baciutmihaela recoveryfollowingorthognathicsurgeryproceduresapilotstudy AT almasanoana recoveryfollowingorthognathicsurgeryproceduresapilotstudy AT mitreandreiotto recoveryfollowingorthognathicsurgeryproceduresapilotstudy AT barburioan recoveryfollowingorthognathicsurgeryproceduresapilotstudy AT hedesiumihaela recoveryfollowingorthognathicsurgeryproceduresapilotstudy AT armenceagabriel recoveryfollowingorthognathicsurgeryproceduresapilotstudy AT oprishoria recoveryfollowingorthognathicsurgeryproceduresapilotstudy AT stoiasebastian recoveryfollowingorthognathicsurgeryproceduresapilotstudy AT tamastiberiu recoveryfollowingorthognathicsurgeryproceduresapilotstudy AT baciutgrigore recoveryfollowingorthognathicsurgeryproceduresapilotstudy AT onisorflorin recoveryfollowingorthognathicsurgeryproceduresapilotstudy AT bransimion recoveryfollowingorthognathicsurgeryproceduresapilotstudy |