Cargando…

Vascularization Strategies in 3D Cell Culture Models: From Scaffold-Free Models to 3D Bioprinting

The discrepancies between the findings in preclinical studies, and in vivo testing and clinical trials have resulted in the gradual decline in drug approval rates over the past decades. Conventional in vitro drug screening platforms employ two-dimensional (2D) cell culture models, which demonstrate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anthon, Shamapto Guha, Valente, Karolina Papera
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9737506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498908
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232314582
_version_ 1784847306369007616
author Anthon, Shamapto Guha
Valente, Karolina Papera
author_facet Anthon, Shamapto Guha
Valente, Karolina Papera
author_sort Anthon, Shamapto Guha
collection PubMed
description The discrepancies between the findings in preclinical studies, and in vivo testing and clinical trials have resulted in the gradual decline in drug approval rates over the past decades. Conventional in vitro drug screening platforms employ two-dimensional (2D) cell culture models, which demonstrate inaccurate drug responses by failing to capture the three-dimensional (3D) tissue microenvironment in vivo. Recent advancements in the field of tissue engineering have made possible the creation of 3D cell culture systems that can accurately recapitulate the cell–cell and cell–extracellular matrix interactions, as well as replicate the intricate microarchitectures observed in native tissues. However, the lack of a perfusion system in 3D cell cultures hinders the establishment of the models as potential drug screening platforms. Over the years, multiple techniques have successfully demonstrated vascularization in 3D cell cultures, simulating in vivo-like drug interactions, proposing the use of 3D systems as drug screening platforms to eliminate the deviations between preclinical and in vivo testing. In this review, the basic principles of 3D cell culture systems are briefly introduced, and current research demonstrating the development of vascularization in 3D cell cultures is discussed, with a particular focus on the potential of these models as the future of drug screening platforms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9737506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97375062022-12-11 Vascularization Strategies in 3D Cell Culture Models: From Scaffold-Free Models to 3D Bioprinting Anthon, Shamapto Guha Valente, Karolina Papera Int J Mol Sci Review The discrepancies between the findings in preclinical studies, and in vivo testing and clinical trials have resulted in the gradual decline in drug approval rates over the past decades. Conventional in vitro drug screening platforms employ two-dimensional (2D) cell culture models, which demonstrate inaccurate drug responses by failing to capture the three-dimensional (3D) tissue microenvironment in vivo. Recent advancements in the field of tissue engineering have made possible the creation of 3D cell culture systems that can accurately recapitulate the cell–cell and cell–extracellular matrix interactions, as well as replicate the intricate microarchitectures observed in native tissues. However, the lack of a perfusion system in 3D cell cultures hinders the establishment of the models as potential drug screening platforms. Over the years, multiple techniques have successfully demonstrated vascularization in 3D cell cultures, simulating in vivo-like drug interactions, proposing the use of 3D systems as drug screening platforms to eliminate the deviations between preclinical and in vivo testing. In this review, the basic principles of 3D cell culture systems are briefly introduced, and current research demonstrating the development of vascularization in 3D cell cultures is discussed, with a particular focus on the potential of these models as the future of drug screening platforms. MDPI 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9737506/ /pubmed/36498908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232314582 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Anthon, Shamapto Guha
Valente, Karolina Papera
Vascularization Strategies in 3D Cell Culture Models: From Scaffold-Free Models to 3D Bioprinting
title Vascularization Strategies in 3D Cell Culture Models: From Scaffold-Free Models to 3D Bioprinting
title_full Vascularization Strategies in 3D Cell Culture Models: From Scaffold-Free Models to 3D Bioprinting
title_fullStr Vascularization Strategies in 3D Cell Culture Models: From Scaffold-Free Models to 3D Bioprinting
title_full_unstemmed Vascularization Strategies in 3D Cell Culture Models: From Scaffold-Free Models to 3D Bioprinting
title_short Vascularization Strategies in 3D Cell Culture Models: From Scaffold-Free Models to 3D Bioprinting
title_sort vascularization strategies in 3d cell culture models: from scaffold-free models to 3d bioprinting
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9737506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498908
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232314582
work_keys_str_mv AT anthonshamaptoguha vascularizationstrategiesin3dcellculturemodelsfromscaffoldfreemodelsto3dbioprinting
AT valentekarolinapapera vascularizationstrategiesin3dcellculturemodelsfromscaffoldfreemodelsto3dbioprinting