Cargando…
Vascularization Strategies in 3D Cell Culture Models: From Scaffold-Free Models to 3D Bioprinting
The discrepancies between the findings in preclinical studies, and in vivo testing and clinical trials have resulted in the gradual decline in drug approval rates over the past decades. Conventional in vitro drug screening platforms employ two-dimensional (2D) cell culture models, which demonstrate...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9737506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232314582 |
_version_ | 1784847306369007616 |
---|---|
author | Anthon, Shamapto Guha Valente, Karolina Papera |
author_facet | Anthon, Shamapto Guha Valente, Karolina Papera |
author_sort | Anthon, Shamapto Guha |
collection | PubMed |
description | The discrepancies between the findings in preclinical studies, and in vivo testing and clinical trials have resulted in the gradual decline in drug approval rates over the past decades. Conventional in vitro drug screening platforms employ two-dimensional (2D) cell culture models, which demonstrate inaccurate drug responses by failing to capture the three-dimensional (3D) tissue microenvironment in vivo. Recent advancements in the field of tissue engineering have made possible the creation of 3D cell culture systems that can accurately recapitulate the cell–cell and cell–extracellular matrix interactions, as well as replicate the intricate microarchitectures observed in native tissues. However, the lack of a perfusion system in 3D cell cultures hinders the establishment of the models as potential drug screening platforms. Over the years, multiple techniques have successfully demonstrated vascularization in 3D cell cultures, simulating in vivo-like drug interactions, proposing the use of 3D systems as drug screening platforms to eliminate the deviations between preclinical and in vivo testing. In this review, the basic principles of 3D cell culture systems are briefly introduced, and current research demonstrating the development of vascularization in 3D cell cultures is discussed, with a particular focus on the potential of these models as the future of drug screening platforms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9737506 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97375062022-12-11 Vascularization Strategies in 3D Cell Culture Models: From Scaffold-Free Models to 3D Bioprinting Anthon, Shamapto Guha Valente, Karolina Papera Int J Mol Sci Review The discrepancies between the findings in preclinical studies, and in vivo testing and clinical trials have resulted in the gradual decline in drug approval rates over the past decades. Conventional in vitro drug screening platforms employ two-dimensional (2D) cell culture models, which demonstrate inaccurate drug responses by failing to capture the three-dimensional (3D) tissue microenvironment in vivo. Recent advancements in the field of tissue engineering have made possible the creation of 3D cell culture systems that can accurately recapitulate the cell–cell and cell–extracellular matrix interactions, as well as replicate the intricate microarchitectures observed in native tissues. However, the lack of a perfusion system in 3D cell cultures hinders the establishment of the models as potential drug screening platforms. Over the years, multiple techniques have successfully demonstrated vascularization in 3D cell cultures, simulating in vivo-like drug interactions, proposing the use of 3D systems as drug screening platforms to eliminate the deviations between preclinical and in vivo testing. In this review, the basic principles of 3D cell culture systems are briefly introduced, and current research demonstrating the development of vascularization in 3D cell cultures is discussed, with a particular focus on the potential of these models as the future of drug screening platforms. MDPI 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9737506/ /pubmed/36498908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232314582 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Anthon, Shamapto Guha Valente, Karolina Papera Vascularization Strategies in 3D Cell Culture Models: From Scaffold-Free Models to 3D Bioprinting |
title | Vascularization Strategies in 3D Cell Culture Models: From Scaffold-Free Models to 3D Bioprinting |
title_full | Vascularization Strategies in 3D Cell Culture Models: From Scaffold-Free Models to 3D Bioprinting |
title_fullStr | Vascularization Strategies in 3D Cell Culture Models: From Scaffold-Free Models to 3D Bioprinting |
title_full_unstemmed | Vascularization Strategies in 3D Cell Culture Models: From Scaffold-Free Models to 3D Bioprinting |
title_short | Vascularization Strategies in 3D Cell Culture Models: From Scaffold-Free Models to 3D Bioprinting |
title_sort | vascularization strategies in 3d cell culture models: from scaffold-free models to 3d bioprinting |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9737506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232314582 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anthonshamaptoguha vascularizationstrategiesin3dcellculturemodelsfromscaffoldfreemodelsto3dbioprinting AT valentekarolinapapera vascularizationstrategiesin3dcellculturemodelsfromscaffoldfreemodelsto3dbioprinting |