Cargando…

Selecting the Best Approach for the Treatment of Multiple Non-Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma

SIMPLE SUMMARY: The best therapy for patients with multiple HCC within the Milan Criteria is liver transplantation (LT). However, LT cannot be offered to all the patients. For the intermediate staged multiple HCC trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) still remains the treatment of choice. However,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cassese, Gianluca, Han, Ho-Seong, Cho, Jai Young, Lee, Hae-Won, Lee, Boram, Troisi, Roberto Ivan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9737585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36497478
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14235997
_version_ 1784847327171706880
author Cassese, Gianluca
Han, Ho-Seong
Cho, Jai Young
Lee, Hae-Won
Lee, Boram
Troisi, Roberto Ivan
author_facet Cassese, Gianluca
Han, Ho-Seong
Cho, Jai Young
Lee, Hae-Won
Lee, Boram
Troisi, Roberto Ivan
author_sort Cassese, Gianluca
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: The best therapy for patients with multiple HCC within the Milan Criteria is liver transplantation (LT). However, LT cannot be offered to all the patients. For the intermediate staged multiple HCC trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) still remains the treatment of choice. However, a growing body of evidence is showing better outcomes after surgery than TACE. Trans-arterial radioembolization and stereotaxic body radiation therapy can also play an important role in this setting. Furthermore, the role of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) for patients with multiple HCC is still debated. ABSTRACT: According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system, the optimal strategy for patients with multiple HCC within the Milan Criteria is liver transplantation (LT). However, LT cannot be offered to all the patients due to organ shortages and long waiting lists, as well as because of the advanced disease carrying a high risk of poor outcomes. For early stages, liver resection (LR) or thermal ablation (TA) can be proposed, while trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) still remains the treatment of choice for intermediate stages (BCLC-B). Asian guidelines and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network suggest LR for resectable multinodular HCCs, even beyond Milan criteria. In this scenario, a growing body of evidence shows better outcomes after surgical resection when compared with TACE. Trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) and stereotaxic body radiation therapy (SBRT) can also play an important role in this setting. Furthermore, the role of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) specifically for patients with multiple HCC is still not clear. This review aims to summarize current knowledge about the best therapeutical strategy for multiple HCC while focusing on the role of minimally invasive surgery and on the most attractive future perspectives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9737585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97375852022-12-11 Selecting the Best Approach for the Treatment of Multiple Non-Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cassese, Gianluca Han, Ho-Seong Cho, Jai Young Lee, Hae-Won Lee, Boram Troisi, Roberto Ivan Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: The best therapy for patients with multiple HCC within the Milan Criteria is liver transplantation (LT). However, LT cannot be offered to all the patients. For the intermediate staged multiple HCC trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) still remains the treatment of choice. However, a growing body of evidence is showing better outcomes after surgery than TACE. Trans-arterial radioembolization and stereotaxic body radiation therapy can also play an important role in this setting. Furthermore, the role of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) for patients with multiple HCC is still debated. ABSTRACT: According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system, the optimal strategy for patients with multiple HCC within the Milan Criteria is liver transplantation (LT). However, LT cannot be offered to all the patients due to organ shortages and long waiting lists, as well as because of the advanced disease carrying a high risk of poor outcomes. For early stages, liver resection (LR) or thermal ablation (TA) can be proposed, while trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) still remains the treatment of choice for intermediate stages (BCLC-B). Asian guidelines and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network suggest LR for resectable multinodular HCCs, even beyond Milan criteria. In this scenario, a growing body of evidence shows better outcomes after surgical resection when compared with TACE. Trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) and stereotaxic body radiation therapy (SBRT) can also play an important role in this setting. Furthermore, the role of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) specifically for patients with multiple HCC is still not clear. This review aims to summarize current knowledge about the best therapeutical strategy for multiple HCC while focusing on the role of minimally invasive surgery and on the most attractive future perspectives. MDPI 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9737585/ /pubmed/36497478 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14235997 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Cassese, Gianluca
Han, Ho-Seong
Cho, Jai Young
Lee, Hae-Won
Lee, Boram
Troisi, Roberto Ivan
Selecting the Best Approach for the Treatment of Multiple Non-Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title Selecting the Best Approach for the Treatment of Multiple Non-Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_full Selecting the Best Approach for the Treatment of Multiple Non-Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_fullStr Selecting the Best Approach for the Treatment of Multiple Non-Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Selecting the Best Approach for the Treatment of Multiple Non-Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_short Selecting the Best Approach for the Treatment of Multiple Non-Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_sort selecting the best approach for the treatment of multiple non-metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9737585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36497478
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14235997
work_keys_str_mv AT cassesegianluca selectingthebestapproachforthetreatmentofmultiplenonmetastatichepatocellularcarcinoma
AT hanhoseong selectingthebestapproachforthetreatmentofmultiplenonmetastatichepatocellularcarcinoma
AT chojaiyoung selectingthebestapproachforthetreatmentofmultiplenonmetastatichepatocellularcarcinoma
AT leehaewon selectingthebestapproachforthetreatmentofmultiplenonmetastatichepatocellularcarcinoma
AT leeboram selectingthebestapproachforthetreatmentofmultiplenonmetastatichepatocellularcarcinoma
AT troisirobertoivan selectingthebestapproachforthetreatmentofmultiplenonmetastatichepatocellularcarcinoma