Cargando…

Facilitators and Barriers of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Rehabilitation: A Mixed-Method Approach

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been used in physical therapy diagnosis and management for various impairments. Physical therapists (PTs) need to be able to utilize the latest innovative treatment techniques to improve the quality of care. The study aimed to describe PTs’ views on AI and investigat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alsobhi, Mashael, Sachdev, Harpreet Singh, Chevidikunnan, Mohamed Faisal, Basuodan, Reem, K U, Dhanesh Kumar, Khan, Fayaz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9737928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36497993
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315919
_version_ 1784847411067224064
author Alsobhi, Mashael
Sachdev, Harpreet Singh
Chevidikunnan, Mohamed Faisal
Basuodan, Reem
K U, Dhanesh Kumar
Khan, Fayaz
author_facet Alsobhi, Mashael
Sachdev, Harpreet Singh
Chevidikunnan, Mohamed Faisal
Basuodan, Reem
K U, Dhanesh Kumar
Khan, Fayaz
author_sort Alsobhi, Mashael
collection PubMed
description Artificial intelligence (AI) has been used in physical therapy diagnosis and management for various impairments. Physical therapists (PTs) need to be able to utilize the latest innovative treatment techniques to improve the quality of care. The study aimed to describe PTs’ views on AI and investigate multiple factors as indicators of AI knowledge, attitude, and adoption among PTs. Moreover, the study aimed to identify the barriers to using AI in rehabilitation. Two hundred and thirty-six PTs participated voluntarily in the study. A concurrent mixed-method design was used to document PTs’ opinions regarding AI deployment in rehabilitation. A self-administered survey consisting of several aspects, including demographic, knowledge, uses, advantages, impacts, and barriers limiting AI utilization in rehabilitation, was used. A total of 63.3% of PTs reported that they had not experienced any kind of AI applications at work. The major factors predicting a higher level of AI knowledge among PTs were being a non-academic worker (OR = 1.77 [95% CI; 1.01 to 3.12], p = 0.04), being a senior PT (OR = 2.44, [95%CI: 1.40 to 4.22], p = 0.002), and having a Master/Doctorate degree (OR = 1.97, [95%CI: 1.11 to 3.50], p = 0.02). However, the cost and resources of AI were the major reported barriers to adopting AI-based technologies. The study highlighted a remarkable dearth of AI knowledge among PTs. AI and advanced knowledge in technology need to be urgently transferred to PTs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9737928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97379282022-12-11 Facilitators and Barriers of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Rehabilitation: A Mixed-Method Approach Alsobhi, Mashael Sachdev, Harpreet Singh Chevidikunnan, Mohamed Faisal Basuodan, Reem K U, Dhanesh Kumar Khan, Fayaz Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Artificial intelligence (AI) has been used in physical therapy diagnosis and management for various impairments. Physical therapists (PTs) need to be able to utilize the latest innovative treatment techniques to improve the quality of care. The study aimed to describe PTs’ views on AI and investigate multiple factors as indicators of AI knowledge, attitude, and adoption among PTs. Moreover, the study aimed to identify the barriers to using AI in rehabilitation. Two hundred and thirty-six PTs participated voluntarily in the study. A concurrent mixed-method design was used to document PTs’ opinions regarding AI deployment in rehabilitation. A self-administered survey consisting of several aspects, including demographic, knowledge, uses, advantages, impacts, and barriers limiting AI utilization in rehabilitation, was used. A total of 63.3% of PTs reported that they had not experienced any kind of AI applications at work. The major factors predicting a higher level of AI knowledge among PTs were being a non-academic worker (OR = 1.77 [95% CI; 1.01 to 3.12], p = 0.04), being a senior PT (OR = 2.44, [95%CI: 1.40 to 4.22], p = 0.002), and having a Master/Doctorate degree (OR = 1.97, [95%CI: 1.11 to 3.50], p = 0.02). However, the cost and resources of AI were the major reported barriers to adopting AI-based technologies. The study highlighted a remarkable dearth of AI knowledge among PTs. AI and advanced knowledge in technology need to be urgently transferred to PTs. MDPI 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9737928/ /pubmed/36497993 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315919 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Alsobhi, Mashael
Sachdev, Harpreet Singh
Chevidikunnan, Mohamed Faisal
Basuodan, Reem
K U, Dhanesh Kumar
Khan, Fayaz
Facilitators and Barriers of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Rehabilitation: A Mixed-Method Approach
title Facilitators and Barriers of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Rehabilitation: A Mixed-Method Approach
title_full Facilitators and Barriers of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Rehabilitation: A Mixed-Method Approach
title_fullStr Facilitators and Barriers of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Rehabilitation: A Mixed-Method Approach
title_full_unstemmed Facilitators and Barriers of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Rehabilitation: A Mixed-Method Approach
title_short Facilitators and Barriers of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Rehabilitation: A Mixed-Method Approach
title_sort facilitators and barriers of artificial intelligence applications in rehabilitation: a mixed-method approach
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9737928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36497993
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315919
work_keys_str_mv AT alsobhimashael facilitatorsandbarriersofartificialintelligenceapplicationsinrehabilitationamixedmethodapproach
AT sachdevharpreetsingh facilitatorsandbarriersofartificialintelligenceapplicationsinrehabilitationamixedmethodapproach
AT chevidikunnanmohamedfaisal facilitatorsandbarriersofartificialintelligenceapplicationsinrehabilitationamixedmethodapproach
AT basuodanreem facilitatorsandbarriersofartificialintelligenceapplicationsinrehabilitationamixedmethodapproach
AT kudhaneshkumar facilitatorsandbarriersofartificialintelligenceapplicationsinrehabilitationamixedmethodapproach
AT khanfayaz facilitatorsandbarriersofartificialintelligenceapplicationsinrehabilitationamixedmethodapproach