Cargando…

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Adamgammadex with Sugammadex for Reversal of Rocuronium-Induced Neuromuscular Block: Results of a Phase II Clinical Trial

This current phase II clinical trial was to compare the effect and safety of adamgammadex, a new cyclodextrin-based selective relaxant binding agent, with sugammadex to reverse rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block. Patients were randomised to receive adamgammadex (4 or 6 mg kg(−1)) or sugammadex (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Yingying, Zhang, Yujun, Zhu, Zhaoqiong, Huang, Yidan, Zhou, Dachun, Liu, Jingchen, Li, Chaoyu, Chen, Xiangdong, Kang, Dingxin, Wang, Shoushi, Liu, Jin, Liu, Bin, Zhang, Wensheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9738056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498526
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11236951
_version_ 1784847442244534272
author Jiang, Yingying
Zhang, Yujun
Zhu, Zhaoqiong
Huang, Yidan
Zhou, Dachun
Liu, Jingchen
Li, Chaoyu
Chen, Xiangdong
Kang, Dingxin
Wang, Shoushi
Liu, Jin
Liu, Bin
Zhang, Wensheng
author_facet Jiang, Yingying
Zhang, Yujun
Zhu, Zhaoqiong
Huang, Yidan
Zhou, Dachun
Liu, Jingchen
Li, Chaoyu
Chen, Xiangdong
Kang, Dingxin
Wang, Shoushi
Liu, Jin
Liu, Bin
Zhang, Wensheng
author_sort Jiang, Yingying
collection PubMed
description This current phase II clinical trial was to compare the effect and safety of adamgammadex, a new cyclodextrin-based selective relaxant binding agent, with sugammadex to reverse rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block. Patients were randomised to receive adamgammadex (4 or 6 mg kg(−1)) or sugammadex (2 mg kg(−1), as a positive control group) at the reappearance of the second twitch (T(2)) in response to TOF stimulation. The standard safety data were collected. The 4 mg kg(−1) (n = 16) and 6 mg kg(−1) (n = 20) adamgammadex- and 2 mg kg(−1) (n = 20) sugammadex-induced recovery time of TOF ratio to 0.9 were 2.3, 1.6, and 1.5 min, respectively (p = 0.49). The 4 mg kg (−1) adamgammadex-induced median recovery time was longer than that of 2 mg kg(−1) sugammadex (p = 0.01), and there was no difference between the 6 mg kg (−1) adamgammadex group and 2 mg kg(−1) sugammadex group (p = 0.32). Then, the number of patients who experienced adverse events (AEs) was 6, 11, and 14 for adamgammadex at 4, 6 mg kg(−1) and sugammadex at 2 mg kg(−1), respectively. The treatment emergent AEs that occurred more than twice were detailed as follows: incision site pain, hypotension, emesis, fever, throat pain, blood bilirubin increase, abnormal T-wave of ECG, dizziness, incision site swelling, postoperative fever, expectoration, and nausea. For drug-related AEs, the increased urine acetone bodies and first-degree atrioventricular block were observed in two patients from sugammadex group. Then, the previously reported AEs were not observed in this study, including anaphylaxis, haemorrhage, recurarization, abnormal basic vital signs, or lengthened QRS intervals and QT intervals. Adamgammadex was found to be effective for reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block as sugammadex.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9738056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97380562022-12-11 Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Adamgammadex with Sugammadex for Reversal of Rocuronium-Induced Neuromuscular Block: Results of a Phase II Clinical Trial Jiang, Yingying Zhang, Yujun Zhu, Zhaoqiong Huang, Yidan Zhou, Dachun Liu, Jingchen Li, Chaoyu Chen, Xiangdong Kang, Dingxin Wang, Shoushi Liu, Jin Liu, Bin Zhang, Wensheng J Clin Med Article This current phase II clinical trial was to compare the effect and safety of adamgammadex, a new cyclodextrin-based selective relaxant binding agent, with sugammadex to reverse rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block. Patients were randomised to receive adamgammadex (4 or 6 mg kg(−1)) or sugammadex (2 mg kg(−1), as a positive control group) at the reappearance of the second twitch (T(2)) in response to TOF stimulation. The standard safety data were collected. The 4 mg kg(−1) (n = 16) and 6 mg kg(−1) (n = 20) adamgammadex- and 2 mg kg(−1) (n = 20) sugammadex-induced recovery time of TOF ratio to 0.9 were 2.3, 1.6, and 1.5 min, respectively (p = 0.49). The 4 mg kg (−1) adamgammadex-induced median recovery time was longer than that of 2 mg kg(−1) sugammadex (p = 0.01), and there was no difference between the 6 mg kg (−1) adamgammadex group and 2 mg kg(−1) sugammadex group (p = 0.32). Then, the number of patients who experienced adverse events (AEs) was 6, 11, and 14 for adamgammadex at 4, 6 mg kg(−1) and sugammadex at 2 mg kg(−1), respectively. The treatment emergent AEs that occurred more than twice were detailed as follows: incision site pain, hypotension, emesis, fever, throat pain, blood bilirubin increase, abnormal T-wave of ECG, dizziness, incision site swelling, postoperative fever, expectoration, and nausea. For drug-related AEs, the increased urine acetone bodies and first-degree atrioventricular block were observed in two patients from sugammadex group. Then, the previously reported AEs were not observed in this study, including anaphylaxis, haemorrhage, recurarization, abnormal basic vital signs, or lengthened QRS intervals and QT intervals. Adamgammadex was found to be effective for reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block as sugammadex. MDPI 2022-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9738056/ /pubmed/36498526 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11236951 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jiang, Yingying
Zhang, Yujun
Zhu, Zhaoqiong
Huang, Yidan
Zhou, Dachun
Liu, Jingchen
Li, Chaoyu
Chen, Xiangdong
Kang, Dingxin
Wang, Shoushi
Liu, Jin
Liu, Bin
Zhang, Wensheng
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Adamgammadex with Sugammadex for Reversal of Rocuronium-Induced Neuromuscular Block: Results of a Phase II Clinical Trial
title Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Adamgammadex with Sugammadex for Reversal of Rocuronium-Induced Neuromuscular Block: Results of a Phase II Clinical Trial
title_full Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Adamgammadex with Sugammadex for Reversal of Rocuronium-Induced Neuromuscular Block: Results of a Phase II Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Adamgammadex with Sugammadex for Reversal of Rocuronium-Induced Neuromuscular Block: Results of a Phase II Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Adamgammadex with Sugammadex for Reversal of Rocuronium-Induced Neuromuscular Block: Results of a Phase II Clinical Trial
title_short Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Adamgammadex with Sugammadex for Reversal of Rocuronium-Induced Neuromuscular Block: Results of a Phase II Clinical Trial
title_sort comparison of the efficacy and safety of adamgammadex with sugammadex for reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: results of a phase ii clinical trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9738056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498526
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11236951
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangyingying comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofadamgammadexwithsugammadexforreversalofrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockresultsofaphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT zhangyujun comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofadamgammadexwithsugammadexforreversalofrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockresultsofaphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT zhuzhaoqiong comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofadamgammadexwithsugammadexforreversalofrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockresultsofaphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT huangyidan comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofadamgammadexwithsugammadexforreversalofrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockresultsofaphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT zhoudachun comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofadamgammadexwithsugammadexforreversalofrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockresultsofaphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT liujingchen comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofadamgammadexwithsugammadexforreversalofrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockresultsofaphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT lichaoyu comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofadamgammadexwithsugammadexforreversalofrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockresultsofaphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT chenxiangdong comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofadamgammadexwithsugammadexforreversalofrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockresultsofaphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT kangdingxin comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofadamgammadexwithsugammadexforreversalofrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockresultsofaphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT wangshoushi comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofadamgammadexwithsugammadexforreversalofrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockresultsofaphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT liujin comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofadamgammadexwithsugammadexforreversalofrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockresultsofaphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT liubin comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofadamgammadexwithsugammadexforreversalofrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockresultsofaphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT zhangwensheng comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofadamgammadexwithsugammadexforreversalofrocuroniuminducedneuromuscularblockresultsofaphaseiiclinicaltrial