Cargando…

Osseous Union after Jaw Reconstruction with Fibula-Free Flap: Conventional vs. CAD/CAM Patient-Specific Implants

SIMPLE SUMMARY: After jaw reconstruction using a fibula-free flap (FFF), an incomplete osseous union is a complication that significantly lengthens the period until the dental rehabilitation and affects the patients’ morbidity and quality of life. Patients-specific implants (PSI) are now widely used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knitschke, Michael, Yonan, Magdalena, Roller, Fritz Christian, Pons-Kühnemann, Jörn, Attia, Sameh, Howaldt, Hans-Peter, Streckbein, Philipp, Böttger, Sebastian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9738514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36497255
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14235774
_version_ 1784847563241816064
author Knitschke, Michael
Yonan, Magdalena
Roller, Fritz Christian
Pons-Kühnemann, Jörn
Attia, Sameh
Howaldt, Hans-Peter
Streckbein, Philipp
Böttger, Sebastian
author_facet Knitschke, Michael
Yonan, Magdalena
Roller, Fritz Christian
Pons-Kühnemann, Jörn
Attia, Sameh
Howaldt, Hans-Peter
Streckbein, Philipp
Böttger, Sebastian
author_sort Knitschke, Michael
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: After jaw reconstruction using a fibula-free flap (FFF), an incomplete osseous union is a complication that significantly lengthens the period until the dental rehabilitation and affects the patients’ morbidity and quality of life. Patients-specific implants (PSI) are now widely used in reconstructive jaw surgery to optimize surgical procedures and lower the rate of complications. This study aims to determine the probability of osseous union following FFF jaw reconstruction with respect to the use of PSI or conventional osteosynthesis (non-PSI). Additionally, risk factors for an incomplete osseous union were determined. ABSTRACT: This is a monocentric, retrospective study of patients who underwent successful immediate or delayed maxilla or mandible reconstructions with FFF from January 2005 to December 2021. Panoramic radiograph, computed tomography scans, and cone-beam CTs were analyzed concerning the osseous union of the intersegmental junctions between maxillary or mandibular native jaw and fibular bone. The primary parameter was to estimate the status of osseous union according to osteosynthesis type. A total number of 133 patients (PSI: n = 64, non-PSI: n = 69) were included in the present study. The mean age was 56.7 ± 14.0 (Range: 14.7–82.7); the primary diagnosis was in 105 patients a malignant (78.9%) and in 20 patients a benign (15.0%) tumor. Mandible reconstruction was performed on 103 patients (77.4%), and on 30 patients (22.6%), maxilla reconstruction was performed. The radiographic images provided a rate of incomplete osseous union (IOU) of about 90% in both groups in the first 6 months. Imaging between 6 and 12 months reveals an IOU rate in the non-PSI group of 46.3% vs. 52.5% in the PSI group, between 12 and 24 months, an IOU rate of 19.6% vs. 26.1%, between 24 and 36 months 8.9% vs. 21.7%, and after 36 months the IOU rate decreases to 4.2% vs. 18.2%. Multivariate logistic regression shows that only osteosynthesis type (OR = 3.518 [95%-CI = 1.223–10.124], p = 0.02) and adjuvant radiotherapy (OR = 4.804 [95%-CI = 1.602–14.409], p = 0.005) are independent risk factors for incomplete osseous union. Cox regression revealed that the variables plate-system (Hazard ratio, HR = 5.014; 95 %-CI: 1.826–3.769; p = 0.002) and adjuvant radiotherapy (HR = 5.710; 95 %-CI: 2.066–15.787; p < 0.001) are predictors for incomplete osseous union. In our study, the rate of incomplete bony fusion was significantly higher in the PSI group. Jaw-to-fibula apposition zones were significantly more affected than intersegmental zones. In multivariate analysis, a combination of osteosynthesis with PSI and adjuvant radiotherapy could be identified as a risk constellation for incomplete ossification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9738514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97385142022-12-11 Osseous Union after Jaw Reconstruction with Fibula-Free Flap: Conventional vs. CAD/CAM Patient-Specific Implants Knitschke, Michael Yonan, Magdalena Roller, Fritz Christian Pons-Kühnemann, Jörn Attia, Sameh Howaldt, Hans-Peter Streckbein, Philipp Böttger, Sebastian Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: After jaw reconstruction using a fibula-free flap (FFF), an incomplete osseous union is a complication that significantly lengthens the period until the dental rehabilitation and affects the patients’ morbidity and quality of life. Patients-specific implants (PSI) are now widely used in reconstructive jaw surgery to optimize surgical procedures and lower the rate of complications. This study aims to determine the probability of osseous union following FFF jaw reconstruction with respect to the use of PSI or conventional osteosynthesis (non-PSI). Additionally, risk factors for an incomplete osseous union were determined. ABSTRACT: This is a monocentric, retrospective study of patients who underwent successful immediate or delayed maxilla or mandible reconstructions with FFF from January 2005 to December 2021. Panoramic radiograph, computed tomography scans, and cone-beam CTs were analyzed concerning the osseous union of the intersegmental junctions between maxillary or mandibular native jaw and fibular bone. The primary parameter was to estimate the status of osseous union according to osteosynthesis type. A total number of 133 patients (PSI: n = 64, non-PSI: n = 69) were included in the present study. The mean age was 56.7 ± 14.0 (Range: 14.7–82.7); the primary diagnosis was in 105 patients a malignant (78.9%) and in 20 patients a benign (15.0%) tumor. Mandible reconstruction was performed on 103 patients (77.4%), and on 30 patients (22.6%), maxilla reconstruction was performed. The radiographic images provided a rate of incomplete osseous union (IOU) of about 90% in both groups in the first 6 months. Imaging between 6 and 12 months reveals an IOU rate in the non-PSI group of 46.3% vs. 52.5% in the PSI group, between 12 and 24 months, an IOU rate of 19.6% vs. 26.1%, between 24 and 36 months 8.9% vs. 21.7%, and after 36 months the IOU rate decreases to 4.2% vs. 18.2%. Multivariate logistic regression shows that only osteosynthesis type (OR = 3.518 [95%-CI = 1.223–10.124], p = 0.02) and adjuvant radiotherapy (OR = 4.804 [95%-CI = 1.602–14.409], p = 0.005) are independent risk factors for incomplete osseous union. Cox regression revealed that the variables plate-system (Hazard ratio, HR = 5.014; 95 %-CI: 1.826–3.769; p = 0.002) and adjuvant radiotherapy (HR = 5.710; 95 %-CI: 2.066–15.787; p < 0.001) are predictors for incomplete osseous union. In our study, the rate of incomplete bony fusion was significantly higher in the PSI group. Jaw-to-fibula apposition zones were significantly more affected than intersegmental zones. In multivariate analysis, a combination of osteosynthesis with PSI and adjuvant radiotherapy could be identified as a risk constellation for incomplete ossification. MDPI 2022-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9738514/ /pubmed/36497255 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14235774 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Knitschke, Michael
Yonan, Magdalena
Roller, Fritz Christian
Pons-Kühnemann, Jörn
Attia, Sameh
Howaldt, Hans-Peter
Streckbein, Philipp
Böttger, Sebastian
Osseous Union after Jaw Reconstruction with Fibula-Free Flap: Conventional vs. CAD/CAM Patient-Specific Implants
title Osseous Union after Jaw Reconstruction with Fibula-Free Flap: Conventional vs. CAD/CAM Patient-Specific Implants
title_full Osseous Union after Jaw Reconstruction with Fibula-Free Flap: Conventional vs. CAD/CAM Patient-Specific Implants
title_fullStr Osseous Union after Jaw Reconstruction with Fibula-Free Flap: Conventional vs. CAD/CAM Patient-Specific Implants
title_full_unstemmed Osseous Union after Jaw Reconstruction with Fibula-Free Flap: Conventional vs. CAD/CAM Patient-Specific Implants
title_short Osseous Union after Jaw Reconstruction with Fibula-Free Flap: Conventional vs. CAD/CAM Patient-Specific Implants
title_sort osseous union after jaw reconstruction with fibula-free flap: conventional vs. cad/cam patient-specific implants
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9738514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36497255
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14235774
work_keys_str_mv AT knitschkemichael osseousunionafterjawreconstructionwithfibulafreeflapconventionalvscadcampatientspecificimplants
AT yonanmagdalena osseousunionafterjawreconstructionwithfibulafreeflapconventionalvscadcampatientspecificimplants
AT rollerfritzchristian osseousunionafterjawreconstructionwithfibulafreeflapconventionalvscadcampatientspecificimplants
AT ponskuhnemannjorn osseousunionafterjawreconstructionwithfibulafreeflapconventionalvscadcampatientspecificimplants
AT attiasameh osseousunionafterjawreconstructionwithfibulafreeflapconventionalvscadcampatientspecificimplants
AT howaldthanspeter osseousunionafterjawreconstructionwithfibulafreeflapconventionalvscadcampatientspecificimplants
AT streckbeinphilipp osseousunionafterjawreconstructionwithfibulafreeflapconventionalvscadcampatientspecificimplants
AT bottgersebastian osseousunionafterjawreconstructionwithfibulafreeflapconventionalvscadcampatientspecificimplants