Cargando…

Post-Fatigue Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate and Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network Indirect Restorations over Endodontically-Treated Molars with Different Preparation Designs: An In-Vitro Study

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the fatigue to cyclic and static resistance of indirect restorations with different preparation designs made either of lithium disilicate (LS) or polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN). Eighty-four (n = 84) molars were chosen, endodontically treated,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Comba, Allegra, Baldi, Andrea, Carossa, Massimo, Michelotto Tempesta, Riccardo, Garino, Eric, Llubani, Xhuliano, Rozzi, Davide, Mikonis, Julius, Paolone, Gaetano, Scotti, Nicola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9739407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36501478
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14235084
_version_ 1784847797791490048
author Comba, Allegra
Baldi, Andrea
Carossa, Massimo
Michelotto Tempesta, Riccardo
Garino, Eric
Llubani, Xhuliano
Rozzi, Davide
Mikonis, Julius
Paolone, Gaetano
Scotti, Nicola
author_facet Comba, Allegra
Baldi, Andrea
Carossa, Massimo
Michelotto Tempesta, Riccardo
Garino, Eric
Llubani, Xhuliano
Rozzi, Davide
Mikonis, Julius
Paolone, Gaetano
Scotti, Nicola
author_sort Comba, Allegra
collection PubMed
description The aim of the present study was to evaluate the fatigue to cyclic and static resistance of indirect restorations with different preparation designs made either of lithium disilicate (LS) or polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN). Eighty-four (n = 84) molars were chosen, endodontically treated, and prepared with standardized MOD cavities. The molars were randomly divided into 6 study groups (n = 14) taking into account the “preparation design’’ (occlusal veneer with 1.2 mm occlusal thickness; overlay with 1.6 mm occlusal thickness; adhesive crown with 2 mm occlusal thickness) and the “CAD/CAM material’’ (E-max CAD, Ivoclar vivadent; Vita Enamic, Vita). A fatigue test was conducted with a chewing simulator set at 50 N for 1,500,000 cycles. Fracture resistance was assessed using a universal testing machine with a 6 mm diameter steel sphere applied to the specimens at a constant speed of 1 mm/min. A SEM analysis before the fracture test was performed to visually analyze the tooth-restoration margins. A statistical analysis was performed with a two-way ANOVA and a post-hoc pairwise comparison was performed using the Tukey test. The two-way ANOVA test showed that both the preparation design factor (p = 0.0429) and the CAD/CAM material factor (p = 0.0002) had a significant influence on the fracture resistance of the adhesive indirect restorations. The interaction between the two variables did not show any significance (p = 0.8218). The occlusal veneer had a lower fracture resistance than the adhesive crown (p = 0.042) but not lower than the overlay preparation (p = 0.095). LS was more resistant than PICN (p = 0.002). In conclusion, in the case of endodontically treated teeth, overlay preparation seems to be a valid alternative to the traditional full crown preparation, while occlusal veneers should be avoided in restoring non-vital molars with a high loss of residual tooth structure. LS material is more resistant compared to PICN.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9739407
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97394072022-12-11 Post-Fatigue Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate and Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network Indirect Restorations over Endodontically-Treated Molars with Different Preparation Designs: An In-Vitro Study Comba, Allegra Baldi, Andrea Carossa, Massimo Michelotto Tempesta, Riccardo Garino, Eric Llubani, Xhuliano Rozzi, Davide Mikonis, Julius Paolone, Gaetano Scotti, Nicola Polymers (Basel) Article The aim of the present study was to evaluate the fatigue to cyclic and static resistance of indirect restorations with different preparation designs made either of lithium disilicate (LS) or polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN). Eighty-four (n = 84) molars were chosen, endodontically treated, and prepared with standardized MOD cavities. The molars were randomly divided into 6 study groups (n = 14) taking into account the “preparation design’’ (occlusal veneer with 1.2 mm occlusal thickness; overlay with 1.6 mm occlusal thickness; adhesive crown with 2 mm occlusal thickness) and the “CAD/CAM material’’ (E-max CAD, Ivoclar vivadent; Vita Enamic, Vita). A fatigue test was conducted with a chewing simulator set at 50 N for 1,500,000 cycles. Fracture resistance was assessed using a universal testing machine with a 6 mm diameter steel sphere applied to the specimens at a constant speed of 1 mm/min. A SEM analysis before the fracture test was performed to visually analyze the tooth-restoration margins. A statistical analysis was performed with a two-way ANOVA and a post-hoc pairwise comparison was performed using the Tukey test. The two-way ANOVA test showed that both the preparation design factor (p = 0.0429) and the CAD/CAM material factor (p = 0.0002) had a significant influence on the fracture resistance of the adhesive indirect restorations. The interaction between the two variables did not show any significance (p = 0.8218). The occlusal veneer had a lower fracture resistance than the adhesive crown (p = 0.042) but not lower than the overlay preparation (p = 0.095). LS was more resistant than PICN (p = 0.002). In conclusion, in the case of endodontically treated teeth, overlay preparation seems to be a valid alternative to the traditional full crown preparation, while occlusal veneers should be avoided in restoring non-vital molars with a high loss of residual tooth structure. LS material is more resistant compared to PICN. MDPI 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9739407/ /pubmed/36501478 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14235084 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Comba, Allegra
Baldi, Andrea
Carossa, Massimo
Michelotto Tempesta, Riccardo
Garino, Eric
Llubani, Xhuliano
Rozzi, Davide
Mikonis, Julius
Paolone, Gaetano
Scotti, Nicola
Post-Fatigue Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate and Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network Indirect Restorations over Endodontically-Treated Molars with Different Preparation Designs: An In-Vitro Study
title Post-Fatigue Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate and Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network Indirect Restorations over Endodontically-Treated Molars with Different Preparation Designs: An In-Vitro Study
title_full Post-Fatigue Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate and Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network Indirect Restorations over Endodontically-Treated Molars with Different Preparation Designs: An In-Vitro Study
title_fullStr Post-Fatigue Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate and Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network Indirect Restorations over Endodontically-Treated Molars with Different Preparation Designs: An In-Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Post-Fatigue Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate and Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network Indirect Restorations over Endodontically-Treated Molars with Different Preparation Designs: An In-Vitro Study
title_short Post-Fatigue Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate and Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network Indirect Restorations over Endodontically-Treated Molars with Different Preparation Designs: An In-Vitro Study
title_sort post-fatigue fracture resistance of lithium disilicate and polymer-infiltrated ceramic network indirect restorations over endodontically-treated molars with different preparation designs: an in-vitro study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9739407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36501478
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14235084
work_keys_str_mv AT combaallegra postfatiguefractureresistanceoflithiumdisilicateandpolymerinfiltratedceramicnetworkindirectrestorationsoverendodonticallytreatedmolarswithdifferentpreparationdesignsaninvitrostudy
AT baldiandrea postfatiguefractureresistanceoflithiumdisilicateandpolymerinfiltratedceramicnetworkindirectrestorationsoverendodonticallytreatedmolarswithdifferentpreparationdesignsaninvitrostudy
AT carossamassimo postfatiguefractureresistanceoflithiumdisilicateandpolymerinfiltratedceramicnetworkindirectrestorationsoverendodonticallytreatedmolarswithdifferentpreparationdesignsaninvitrostudy
AT michelottotempestariccardo postfatiguefractureresistanceoflithiumdisilicateandpolymerinfiltratedceramicnetworkindirectrestorationsoverendodonticallytreatedmolarswithdifferentpreparationdesignsaninvitrostudy
AT garinoeric postfatiguefractureresistanceoflithiumdisilicateandpolymerinfiltratedceramicnetworkindirectrestorationsoverendodonticallytreatedmolarswithdifferentpreparationdesignsaninvitrostudy
AT llubanixhuliano postfatiguefractureresistanceoflithiumdisilicateandpolymerinfiltratedceramicnetworkindirectrestorationsoverendodonticallytreatedmolarswithdifferentpreparationdesignsaninvitrostudy
AT rozzidavide postfatiguefractureresistanceoflithiumdisilicateandpolymerinfiltratedceramicnetworkindirectrestorationsoverendodonticallytreatedmolarswithdifferentpreparationdesignsaninvitrostudy
AT mikonisjulius postfatiguefractureresistanceoflithiumdisilicateandpolymerinfiltratedceramicnetworkindirectrestorationsoverendodonticallytreatedmolarswithdifferentpreparationdesignsaninvitrostudy
AT paolonegaetano postfatiguefractureresistanceoflithiumdisilicateandpolymerinfiltratedceramicnetworkindirectrestorationsoverendodonticallytreatedmolarswithdifferentpreparationdesignsaninvitrostudy
AT scottinicola postfatiguefractureresistanceoflithiumdisilicateandpolymerinfiltratedceramicnetworkindirectrestorationsoverendodonticallytreatedmolarswithdifferentpreparationdesignsaninvitrostudy