Cargando…

Could Short Stems THA Be a Good Bone-Saving Option Even in Obese Patients?

Short femoral stems, with preservation of the femoral bone stock, are commonly used in recent years for hip replacement in younger and more active patients. Obesity is increasingly spreading even in the younger population. The aim of this case-series study is to evaluate short stems compared to trad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saracco, Michela, Fidanza, Andrea, Necozione, Stefano, Maccauro, Giulio, Logroscino, Giandomenico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9739638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498685
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237114
_version_ 1784847857283497984
author Saracco, Michela
Fidanza, Andrea
Necozione, Stefano
Maccauro, Giulio
Logroscino, Giandomenico
author_facet Saracco, Michela
Fidanza, Andrea
Necozione, Stefano
Maccauro, Giulio
Logroscino, Giandomenico
author_sort Saracco, Michela
collection PubMed
description Short femoral stems, with preservation of the femoral bone stock, are commonly used in recent years for hip replacement in younger and more active patients. Obesity is increasingly spreading even in the younger population. The aim of this case-series study is to evaluate short stems compared to traditional hip prostheses in the obese population. A total of 77 consecutive patients with a BMI greater than or equal to 30 Kg/m(2) were enrolled in this prospective study and were divided into two groups: 49 patients have been implanted with short stems while 28 patients were implanted with traditional stems. All the patients were treated for primary osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis and all the stems were implanted by the same surgeon using a posterior approach. Clinical (Harris Hip Score—HHS, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index—WOMAC, visual analogue scale—VAS, 12-item Short Form Health Survey—SF-12) and radiographic outcomes were recorded. Radiological evaluations were carried out by three different blinded surgeons. A statistical analysis was performed (chi-square, t-test, Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test, 2-factor ANOVA). At a mean follow-up of 42.6 months both groups showed a marked improvement in pain and in the clinical scores between pre- and post-surgical procedures (p < 0.05) with no significant differences between the two groups at last follow-up (p > 0.05). The radiological evaluations, with high concordance correlation between the three blinded surgeons (ICC consistently >0.80), showed good positioning and osseointegration in all cases, with no significant differences in the restoration of the joint geometry and complications. No revisions were recorded during the follow-up period. In conclusion, short stems appear to be a good option for bone preservation even in obese patients, showing comparable results to traditional implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9739638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97396382022-12-11 Could Short Stems THA Be a Good Bone-Saving Option Even in Obese Patients? Saracco, Michela Fidanza, Andrea Necozione, Stefano Maccauro, Giulio Logroscino, Giandomenico J Clin Med Article Short femoral stems, with preservation of the femoral bone stock, are commonly used in recent years for hip replacement in younger and more active patients. Obesity is increasingly spreading even in the younger population. The aim of this case-series study is to evaluate short stems compared to traditional hip prostheses in the obese population. A total of 77 consecutive patients with a BMI greater than or equal to 30 Kg/m(2) were enrolled in this prospective study and were divided into two groups: 49 patients have been implanted with short stems while 28 patients were implanted with traditional stems. All the patients were treated for primary osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis and all the stems were implanted by the same surgeon using a posterior approach. Clinical (Harris Hip Score—HHS, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index—WOMAC, visual analogue scale—VAS, 12-item Short Form Health Survey—SF-12) and radiographic outcomes were recorded. Radiological evaluations were carried out by three different blinded surgeons. A statistical analysis was performed (chi-square, t-test, Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test, 2-factor ANOVA). At a mean follow-up of 42.6 months both groups showed a marked improvement in pain and in the clinical scores between pre- and post-surgical procedures (p < 0.05) with no significant differences between the two groups at last follow-up (p > 0.05). The radiological evaluations, with high concordance correlation between the three blinded surgeons (ICC consistently >0.80), showed good positioning and osseointegration in all cases, with no significant differences in the restoration of the joint geometry and complications. No revisions were recorded during the follow-up period. In conclusion, short stems appear to be a good option for bone preservation even in obese patients, showing comparable results to traditional implants. MDPI 2022-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9739638/ /pubmed/36498685 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237114 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Saracco, Michela
Fidanza, Andrea
Necozione, Stefano
Maccauro, Giulio
Logroscino, Giandomenico
Could Short Stems THA Be a Good Bone-Saving Option Even in Obese Patients?
title Could Short Stems THA Be a Good Bone-Saving Option Even in Obese Patients?
title_full Could Short Stems THA Be a Good Bone-Saving Option Even in Obese Patients?
title_fullStr Could Short Stems THA Be a Good Bone-Saving Option Even in Obese Patients?
title_full_unstemmed Could Short Stems THA Be a Good Bone-Saving Option Even in Obese Patients?
title_short Could Short Stems THA Be a Good Bone-Saving Option Even in Obese Patients?
title_sort could short stems tha be a good bone-saving option even in obese patients?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9739638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498685
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237114
work_keys_str_mv AT saraccomichela couldshortstemsthabeagoodbonesavingoptioneveninobesepatients
AT fidanzaandrea couldshortstemsthabeagoodbonesavingoptioneveninobesepatients
AT necozionestefano couldshortstemsthabeagoodbonesavingoptioneveninobesepatients
AT maccaurogiulio couldshortstemsthabeagoodbonesavingoptioneveninobesepatients
AT logroscinogiandomenico couldshortstemsthabeagoodbonesavingoptioneveninobesepatients