Cargando…
A Comparison and Analysis of Three Methods of Aluminum Crown Forgings in Processing Optimization
In this study, three parameter optimization methods and two designs of experiments (DOE) were used for the optimization of three major design parameters ((bill diameter (D), billet length (L), and barrier wall design (BWD)) in crown forging to improve the formability of aluminum workpiece for shock...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9739819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36499894 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15238400 |
_version_ | 1784847902712004608 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Chi-Peng Su, Hui-Zhen Shih, Jyun-Kai Huang, Cheng-Fu Ku, Hao-Yun Chan, Chien-Wei Li, Tomi-T. Fuh, Yiin-Kuen |
author_facet | Chen, Chi-Peng Su, Hui-Zhen Shih, Jyun-Kai Huang, Cheng-Fu Ku, Hao-Yun Chan, Chien-Wei Li, Tomi-T. Fuh, Yiin-Kuen |
author_sort | Chen, Chi-Peng |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, three parameter optimization methods and two designs of experiments (DOE) were used for the optimization of three major design parameters ((bill diameter (D), billet length (L), and barrier wall design (BWD)) in crown forging to improve the formability of aluminum workpiece for shock absorbers. The first optimization method is the response surface method (RSM) combined with Box–Behnken’s experimental design to establish fifteen (15) sets of parameter combinations for research. The second one is the main effects plot method (MEP). The third one is the multiobjective optimization method combined with Taguchi’s experimental design method, which designed nine (9) parameter combinations and conducted research and analysis through grey relational analysis (GRA). Initially, a new type of forging die and billet in the controlled deformation zone (CDZ) was established by CAD (computer-aided design) modeling and the finite element method (FEM) for model simulation. Then, this investigation showed that the optimal parameter conditions obtained by these three optimization approaches (RSM, MEP, and multiobjective optimization) are consistent, with the same results. The best optimization parameters are the dimension of the billet ((D: 40 mm, the length of the billet (L): 205 mm, and the design of the barrier wall (BWD): 22 mm)). The results indicate that the optimization methods used in this research all have a high degree of accuracy. According to the research results of grey relational analysis (GRA), the size of the barrier wall design (BWD) in the controllable deformation zone (CDZ) has the greatest influence on the improvement of the preforming die, indicating that it is an important factor to increase the filling rate of aluminum crown forgings. At the end, the optimized parameters are verified by FEM simulation analysis and actual production validation as well as grain streamline distribution, processing map, and microstructure analysis on crown forgings. The novelty of this work is that it provides a novel preforming die through the mutual verification of different optimization methods to solve a typical problem such as material underfill. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9739819 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97398192022-12-11 A Comparison and Analysis of Three Methods of Aluminum Crown Forgings in Processing Optimization Chen, Chi-Peng Su, Hui-Zhen Shih, Jyun-Kai Huang, Cheng-Fu Ku, Hao-Yun Chan, Chien-Wei Li, Tomi-T. Fuh, Yiin-Kuen Materials (Basel) Article In this study, three parameter optimization methods and two designs of experiments (DOE) were used for the optimization of three major design parameters ((bill diameter (D), billet length (L), and barrier wall design (BWD)) in crown forging to improve the formability of aluminum workpiece for shock absorbers. The first optimization method is the response surface method (RSM) combined with Box–Behnken’s experimental design to establish fifteen (15) sets of parameter combinations for research. The second one is the main effects plot method (MEP). The third one is the multiobjective optimization method combined with Taguchi’s experimental design method, which designed nine (9) parameter combinations and conducted research and analysis through grey relational analysis (GRA). Initially, a new type of forging die and billet in the controlled deformation zone (CDZ) was established by CAD (computer-aided design) modeling and the finite element method (FEM) for model simulation. Then, this investigation showed that the optimal parameter conditions obtained by these three optimization approaches (RSM, MEP, and multiobjective optimization) are consistent, with the same results. The best optimization parameters are the dimension of the billet ((D: 40 mm, the length of the billet (L): 205 mm, and the design of the barrier wall (BWD): 22 mm)). The results indicate that the optimization methods used in this research all have a high degree of accuracy. According to the research results of grey relational analysis (GRA), the size of the barrier wall design (BWD) in the controllable deformation zone (CDZ) has the greatest influence on the improvement of the preforming die, indicating that it is an important factor to increase the filling rate of aluminum crown forgings. At the end, the optimized parameters are verified by FEM simulation analysis and actual production validation as well as grain streamline distribution, processing map, and microstructure analysis on crown forgings. The novelty of this work is that it provides a novel preforming die through the mutual verification of different optimization methods to solve a typical problem such as material underfill. MDPI 2022-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9739819/ /pubmed/36499894 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15238400 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Chen, Chi-Peng Su, Hui-Zhen Shih, Jyun-Kai Huang, Cheng-Fu Ku, Hao-Yun Chan, Chien-Wei Li, Tomi-T. Fuh, Yiin-Kuen A Comparison and Analysis of Three Methods of Aluminum Crown Forgings in Processing Optimization |
title | A Comparison and Analysis of Three Methods of Aluminum Crown Forgings in Processing Optimization |
title_full | A Comparison and Analysis of Three Methods of Aluminum Crown Forgings in Processing Optimization |
title_fullStr | A Comparison and Analysis of Three Methods of Aluminum Crown Forgings in Processing Optimization |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison and Analysis of Three Methods of Aluminum Crown Forgings in Processing Optimization |
title_short | A Comparison and Analysis of Three Methods of Aluminum Crown Forgings in Processing Optimization |
title_sort | comparison and analysis of three methods of aluminum crown forgings in processing optimization |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9739819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36499894 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15238400 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenchipeng acomparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization AT suhuizhen acomparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization AT shihjyunkai acomparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization AT huangchengfu acomparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization AT kuhaoyun acomparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization AT chanchienwei acomparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization AT litomit acomparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization AT fuhyiinkuen acomparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization AT chenchipeng comparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization AT suhuizhen comparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization AT shihjyunkai comparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization AT huangchengfu comparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization AT kuhaoyun comparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization AT chanchienwei comparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization AT litomit comparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization AT fuhyiinkuen comparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization |