Cargando…

A Comparison and Analysis of Three Methods of Aluminum Crown Forgings in Processing Optimization

In this study, three parameter optimization methods and two designs of experiments (DOE) were used for the optimization of three major design parameters ((bill diameter (D), billet length (L), and barrier wall design (BWD)) in crown forging to improve the formability of aluminum workpiece for shock...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Chi-Peng, Su, Hui-Zhen, Shih, Jyun-Kai, Huang, Cheng-Fu, Ku, Hao-Yun, Chan, Chien-Wei, Li, Tomi-T., Fuh, Yiin-Kuen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9739819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36499894
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15238400
_version_ 1784847902712004608
author Chen, Chi-Peng
Su, Hui-Zhen
Shih, Jyun-Kai
Huang, Cheng-Fu
Ku, Hao-Yun
Chan, Chien-Wei
Li, Tomi-T.
Fuh, Yiin-Kuen
author_facet Chen, Chi-Peng
Su, Hui-Zhen
Shih, Jyun-Kai
Huang, Cheng-Fu
Ku, Hao-Yun
Chan, Chien-Wei
Li, Tomi-T.
Fuh, Yiin-Kuen
author_sort Chen, Chi-Peng
collection PubMed
description In this study, three parameter optimization methods and two designs of experiments (DOE) were used for the optimization of three major design parameters ((bill diameter (D), billet length (L), and barrier wall design (BWD)) in crown forging to improve the formability of aluminum workpiece for shock absorbers. The first optimization method is the response surface method (RSM) combined with Box–Behnken’s experimental design to establish fifteen (15) sets of parameter combinations for research. The second one is the main effects plot method (MEP). The third one is the multiobjective optimization method combined with Taguchi’s experimental design method, which designed nine (9) parameter combinations and conducted research and analysis through grey relational analysis (GRA). Initially, a new type of forging die and billet in the controlled deformation zone (CDZ) was established by CAD (computer-aided design) modeling and the finite element method (FEM) for model simulation. Then, this investigation showed that the optimal parameter conditions obtained by these three optimization approaches (RSM, MEP, and multiobjective optimization) are consistent, with the same results. The best optimization parameters are the dimension of the billet ((D: 40 mm, the length of the billet (L): 205 mm, and the design of the barrier wall (BWD): 22 mm)). The results indicate that the optimization methods used in this research all have a high degree of accuracy. According to the research results of grey relational analysis (GRA), the size of the barrier wall design (BWD) in the controllable deformation zone (CDZ) has the greatest influence on the improvement of the preforming die, indicating that it is an important factor to increase the filling rate of aluminum crown forgings. At the end, the optimized parameters are verified by FEM simulation analysis and actual production validation as well as grain streamline distribution, processing map, and microstructure analysis on crown forgings. The novelty of this work is that it provides a novel preforming die through the mutual verification of different optimization methods to solve a typical problem such as material underfill.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9739819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97398192022-12-11 A Comparison and Analysis of Three Methods of Aluminum Crown Forgings in Processing Optimization Chen, Chi-Peng Su, Hui-Zhen Shih, Jyun-Kai Huang, Cheng-Fu Ku, Hao-Yun Chan, Chien-Wei Li, Tomi-T. Fuh, Yiin-Kuen Materials (Basel) Article In this study, three parameter optimization methods and two designs of experiments (DOE) were used for the optimization of three major design parameters ((bill diameter (D), billet length (L), and barrier wall design (BWD)) in crown forging to improve the formability of aluminum workpiece for shock absorbers. The first optimization method is the response surface method (RSM) combined with Box–Behnken’s experimental design to establish fifteen (15) sets of parameter combinations for research. The second one is the main effects plot method (MEP). The third one is the multiobjective optimization method combined with Taguchi’s experimental design method, which designed nine (9) parameter combinations and conducted research and analysis through grey relational analysis (GRA). Initially, a new type of forging die and billet in the controlled deformation zone (CDZ) was established by CAD (computer-aided design) modeling and the finite element method (FEM) for model simulation. Then, this investigation showed that the optimal parameter conditions obtained by these three optimization approaches (RSM, MEP, and multiobjective optimization) are consistent, with the same results. The best optimization parameters are the dimension of the billet ((D: 40 mm, the length of the billet (L): 205 mm, and the design of the barrier wall (BWD): 22 mm)). The results indicate that the optimization methods used in this research all have a high degree of accuracy. According to the research results of grey relational analysis (GRA), the size of the barrier wall design (BWD) in the controllable deformation zone (CDZ) has the greatest influence on the improvement of the preforming die, indicating that it is an important factor to increase the filling rate of aluminum crown forgings. At the end, the optimized parameters are verified by FEM simulation analysis and actual production validation as well as grain streamline distribution, processing map, and microstructure analysis on crown forgings. The novelty of this work is that it provides a novel preforming die through the mutual verification of different optimization methods to solve a typical problem such as material underfill. MDPI 2022-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9739819/ /pubmed/36499894 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15238400 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chen, Chi-Peng
Su, Hui-Zhen
Shih, Jyun-Kai
Huang, Cheng-Fu
Ku, Hao-Yun
Chan, Chien-Wei
Li, Tomi-T.
Fuh, Yiin-Kuen
A Comparison and Analysis of Three Methods of Aluminum Crown Forgings in Processing Optimization
title A Comparison and Analysis of Three Methods of Aluminum Crown Forgings in Processing Optimization
title_full A Comparison and Analysis of Three Methods of Aluminum Crown Forgings in Processing Optimization
title_fullStr A Comparison and Analysis of Three Methods of Aluminum Crown Forgings in Processing Optimization
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison and Analysis of Three Methods of Aluminum Crown Forgings in Processing Optimization
title_short A Comparison and Analysis of Three Methods of Aluminum Crown Forgings in Processing Optimization
title_sort comparison and analysis of three methods of aluminum crown forgings in processing optimization
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9739819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36499894
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15238400
work_keys_str_mv AT chenchipeng acomparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization
AT suhuizhen acomparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization
AT shihjyunkai acomparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization
AT huangchengfu acomparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization
AT kuhaoyun acomparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization
AT chanchienwei acomparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization
AT litomit acomparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization
AT fuhyiinkuen acomparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization
AT chenchipeng comparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization
AT suhuizhen comparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization
AT shihjyunkai comparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization
AT huangchengfu comparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization
AT kuhaoyun comparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization
AT chanchienwei comparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization
AT litomit comparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization
AT fuhyiinkuen comparisonandanalysisofthreemethodsofaluminumcrownforgingsinprocessingoptimization