Cargando…

Comparative Study between Physics-Informed CNN and PCA in Induction Motor Broken Bars MCSA Detection

In this article, two methods for broken bar detection in induction motors are considered and tested using data collected from the LIAS laboratory at the University of Poitiers. The first approach is Motor Current Signature Analysis (MCSA) with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), in which measuremen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boushaba, Abderrahim, Cauet, Sebastien, Chamroo, Afzal, Etien, Erik, Rambault, Laurent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9740424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36502196
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22239494
_version_ 1784848058697121792
author Boushaba, Abderrahim
Cauet, Sebastien
Chamroo, Afzal
Etien, Erik
Rambault, Laurent
author_facet Boushaba, Abderrahim
Cauet, Sebastien
Chamroo, Afzal
Etien, Erik
Rambault, Laurent
author_sort Boushaba, Abderrahim
collection PubMed
description In this article, two methods for broken bar detection in induction motors are considered and tested using data collected from the LIAS laboratory at the University of Poitiers. The first approach is Motor Current Signature Analysis (MCSA) with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), in which measurements have to be processed in the frequency domain before training the CNN to ensure that the resulting model is physically informed. A double input CNN has been introduced to perform a 100% detection regardless of the speed and load torque value. A second approach is the Principal Components Analysis (PCA), in which the processing is undertaken in the time domain. The PCA is applied on the induction motor currents to eventually calculate the Q statistic that serves as a threshold for detecting anomalies/faults. Even if obtained results show that both approaches work very well, there are major differences that need to be pointed out, and this is the aim of the current paper.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9740424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97404242022-12-11 Comparative Study between Physics-Informed CNN and PCA in Induction Motor Broken Bars MCSA Detection Boushaba, Abderrahim Cauet, Sebastien Chamroo, Afzal Etien, Erik Rambault, Laurent Sensors (Basel) Article In this article, two methods for broken bar detection in induction motors are considered and tested using data collected from the LIAS laboratory at the University of Poitiers. The first approach is Motor Current Signature Analysis (MCSA) with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), in which measurements have to be processed in the frequency domain before training the CNN to ensure that the resulting model is physically informed. A double input CNN has been introduced to perform a 100% detection regardless of the speed and load torque value. A second approach is the Principal Components Analysis (PCA), in which the processing is undertaken in the time domain. The PCA is applied on the induction motor currents to eventually calculate the Q statistic that serves as a threshold for detecting anomalies/faults. Even if obtained results show that both approaches work very well, there are major differences that need to be pointed out, and this is the aim of the current paper. MDPI 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9740424/ /pubmed/36502196 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22239494 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Boushaba, Abderrahim
Cauet, Sebastien
Chamroo, Afzal
Etien, Erik
Rambault, Laurent
Comparative Study between Physics-Informed CNN and PCA in Induction Motor Broken Bars MCSA Detection
title Comparative Study between Physics-Informed CNN and PCA in Induction Motor Broken Bars MCSA Detection
title_full Comparative Study between Physics-Informed CNN and PCA in Induction Motor Broken Bars MCSA Detection
title_fullStr Comparative Study between Physics-Informed CNN and PCA in Induction Motor Broken Bars MCSA Detection
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study between Physics-Informed CNN and PCA in Induction Motor Broken Bars MCSA Detection
title_short Comparative Study between Physics-Informed CNN and PCA in Induction Motor Broken Bars MCSA Detection
title_sort comparative study between physics-informed cnn and pca in induction motor broken bars mcsa detection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9740424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36502196
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22239494
work_keys_str_mv AT boushabaabderrahim comparativestudybetweenphysicsinformedcnnandpcaininductionmotorbrokenbarsmcsadetection
AT cauetsebastien comparativestudybetweenphysicsinformedcnnandpcaininductionmotorbrokenbarsmcsadetection
AT chamrooafzal comparativestudybetweenphysicsinformedcnnandpcaininductionmotorbrokenbarsmcsadetection
AT etienerik comparativestudybetweenphysicsinformedcnnandpcaininductionmotorbrokenbarsmcsadetection
AT rambaultlaurent comparativestudybetweenphysicsinformedcnnandpcaininductionmotorbrokenbarsmcsadetection