Cargando…

Outcomes and Complications from a Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Conventional Stent Placement Versus No Stent Placement after Ureteroscopy for Distal Ureteric Calculus < 1 cm

Ureteric stent insertion following ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) is a common and widely accepted procedure. However, there is no agreement on whether a ureteric stent should be placed following an uncomplicated URSL. Furthermore, the definition of uncomplicated URSL remains debatable. To compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reddy, Suraj Jayadeva, Reddy, Bathi Sourabh, Chawla, Arun, de la Rosette, Jean J. M. C. H., Laguna, Pilar, Hegde, Padmaraj, Shah, Abhijit, Choudhary, Anupam, Kankaria, Sanket, Hiremath, Vivekanand Kedarlingayya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9740435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498598
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237023
_version_ 1784848061513596928
author Reddy, Suraj Jayadeva
Reddy, Bathi Sourabh
Chawla, Arun
de la Rosette, Jean J. M. C. H.
Laguna, Pilar
Hegde, Padmaraj
Shah, Abhijit
Choudhary, Anupam
Kankaria, Sanket
Hiremath, Vivekanand Kedarlingayya
author_facet Reddy, Suraj Jayadeva
Reddy, Bathi Sourabh
Chawla, Arun
de la Rosette, Jean J. M. C. H.
Laguna, Pilar
Hegde, Padmaraj
Shah, Abhijit
Choudhary, Anupam
Kankaria, Sanket
Hiremath, Vivekanand Kedarlingayya
author_sort Reddy, Suraj Jayadeva
collection PubMed
description Ureteric stent insertion following ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) is a common and widely accepted procedure. However, there is no agreement on whether a ureteric stent should be placed following an uncomplicated URSL. Furthermore, the definition of uncomplicated URSL remains debatable. To compare the efficacy, safety, and morbidity of no stent placement with the conventional stent placement after uncomplicated retrograde semirigid URS for a distal ureteric calculus of size ≤1 cm, we compared the corresponding complication rates, emergency visits, secondary interventions, and pain at follow-up. Following an uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy, 104 patients were randomized into the conventional stented group (CSG) and nonstented group (NSG). Lower urinary tract symptoms and sexual function were evaluated using validated questionnaires (IPSS + IIEF-5 + MSHQ-EjD/FSFI) preoperatively and at 4 weeks during follow-up. Pain scores at follow-up were recorded using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Patients who visited the emergency room or needed secondary interventions before the recommended follow-up time were noted. The Generalized Estimating Equations method was used to explore the difference in change in the domains of IPSS, IIEF-5, MSHQ-EjD, and FSFI between the two groups over time. A significant difference was noted in the following IPSS domains: Frequency, Urgency, Nocturia, Storage Symptoms, Total IPSS Score (p ≤ 0.001), and QoL (p = 0.002); IIEF-5 domains: Overall Score (p = 0.004); MSHQ-EjD domains: Ejaculation Bother/Satisfaction (p ≤ 0.001); and FSFI domains: Lubrication (p ≤ 0.001), Satisfaction (p = 0.006), and Overall Score (p = 0.004). There was no significant difference between the various groups in terms of distribution of emergency visits, readmission and secondary interventions, pain at follow-up (VAS), and need for long-term analgesia. Nonplacement of stents after uncomplicated URS decreases stent-related symptoms and preserves QoL without placing the patient under increased postoperative risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9740435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97404352022-12-11 Outcomes and Complications from a Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Conventional Stent Placement Versus No Stent Placement after Ureteroscopy for Distal Ureteric Calculus < 1 cm Reddy, Suraj Jayadeva Reddy, Bathi Sourabh Chawla, Arun de la Rosette, Jean J. M. C. H. Laguna, Pilar Hegde, Padmaraj Shah, Abhijit Choudhary, Anupam Kankaria, Sanket Hiremath, Vivekanand Kedarlingayya J Clin Med Article Ureteric stent insertion following ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) is a common and widely accepted procedure. However, there is no agreement on whether a ureteric stent should be placed following an uncomplicated URSL. Furthermore, the definition of uncomplicated URSL remains debatable. To compare the efficacy, safety, and morbidity of no stent placement with the conventional stent placement after uncomplicated retrograde semirigid URS for a distal ureteric calculus of size ≤1 cm, we compared the corresponding complication rates, emergency visits, secondary interventions, and pain at follow-up. Following an uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy, 104 patients were randomized into the conventional stented group (CSG) and nonstented group (NSG). Lower urinary tract symptoms and sexual function were evaluated using validated questionnaires (IPSS + IIEF-5 + MSHQ-EjD/FSFI) preoperatively and at 4 weeks during follow-up. Pain scores at follow-up were recorded using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Patients who visited the emergency room or needed secondary interventions before the recommended follow-up time were noted. The Generalized Estimating Equations method was used to explore the difference in change in the domains of IPSS, IIEF-5, MSHQ-EjD, and FSFI between the two groups over time. A significant difference was noted in the following IPSS domains: Frequency, Urgency, Nocturia, Storage Symptoms, Total IPSS Score (p ≤ 0.001), and QoL (p = 0.002); IIEF-5 domains: Overall Score (p = 0.004); MSHQ-EjD domains: Ejaculation Bother/Satisfaction (p ≤ 0.001); and FSFI domains: Lubrication (p ≤ 0.001), Satisfaction (p = 0.006), and Overall Score (p = 0.004). There was no significant difference between the various groups in terms of distribution of emergency visits, readmission and secondary interventions, pain at follow-up (VAS), and need for long-term analgesia. Nonplacement of stents after uncomplicated URS decreases stent-related symptoms and preserves QoL without placing the patient under increased postoperative risk. MDPI 2022-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9740435/ /pubmed/36498598 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237023 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Reddy, Suraj Jayadeva
Reddy, Bathi Sourabh
Chawla, Arun
de la Rosette, Jean J. M. C. H.
Laguna, Pilar
Hegde, Padmaraj
Shah, Abhijit
Choudhary, Anupam
Kankaria, Sanket
Hiremath, Vivekanand Kedarlingayya
Outcomes and Complications from a Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Conventional Stent Placement Versus No Stent Placement after Ureteroscopy for Distal Ureteric Calculus < 1 cm
title Outcomes and Complications from a Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Conventional Stent Placement Versus No Stent Placement after Ureteroscopy for Distal Ureteric Calculus < 1 cm
title_full Outcomes and Complications from a Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Conventional Stent Placement Versus No Stent Placement after Ureteroscopy for Distal Ureteric Calculus < 1 cm
title_fullStr Outcomes and Complications from a Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Conventional Stent Placement Versus No Stent Placement after Ureteroscopy for Distal Ureteric Calculus < 1 cm
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes and Complications from a Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Conventional Stent Placement Versus No Stent Placement after Ureteroscopy for Distal Ureteric Calculus < 1 cm
title_short Outcomes and Complications from a Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Conventional Stent Placement Versus No Stent Placement after Ureteroscopy for Distal Ureteric Calculus < 1 cm
title_sort outcomes and complications from a randomized controlled study comparing conventional stent placement versus no stent placement after ureteroscopy for distal ureteric calculus < 1 cm
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9740435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36498598
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237023
work_keys_str_mv AT reddysurajjayadeva outcomesandcomplicationsfromarandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingconventionalstentplacementversusnostentplacementafterureteroscopyfordistaluretericcalculus1cm
AT reddybathisourabh outcomesandcomplicationsfromarandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingconventionalstentplacementversusnostentplacementafterureteroscopyfordistaluretericcalculus1cm
AT chawlaarun outcomesandcomplicationsfromarandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingconventionalstentplacementversusnostentplacementafterureteroscopyfordistaluretericcalculus1cm
AT delarosettejeanjmch outcomesandcomplicationsfromarandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingconventionalstentplacementversusnostentplacementafterureteroscopyfordistaluretericcalculus1cm
AT lagunapilar outcomesandcomplicationsfromarandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingconventionalstentplacementversusnostentplacementafterureteroscopyfordistaluretericcalculus1cm
AT hegdepadmaraj outcomesandcomplicationsfromarandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingconventionalstentplacementversusnostentplacementafterureteroscopyfordistaluretericcalculus1cm
AT shahabhijit outcomesandcomplicationsfromarandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingconventionalstentplacementversusnostentplacementafterureteroscopyfordistaluretericcalculus1cm
AT choudharyanupam outcomesandcomplicationsfromarandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingconventionalstentplacementversusnostentplacementafterureteroscopyfordistaluretericcalculus1cm
AT kankariasanket outcomesandcomplicationsfromarandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingconventionalstentplacementversusnostentplacementafterureteroscopyfordistaluretericcalculus1cm
AT hiremathvivekanandkedarlingayya outcomesandcomplicationsfromarandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingconventionalstentplacementversusnostentplacementafterureteroscopyfordistaluretericcalculus1cm