Cargando…

The Power of Suggestion: Subjective Satiety Is Affected by Nutrient and Health-Focused Food Labelling with No Effect on Physiological Gut Hormone Release

Health claims on food labelling can influence peoples’ perception of food without them actually eating it, for example driving a belief that a particular food will make them feel fuller. The aim of this study was to investigate whether nutrient and health claims on food labelling can influence self-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watson, Sinead, O’Hara, Hannah, Reveendran, Dharsshini, Cardwell, Christopher, Murphy, Kevin G., Benson, Tony, Dean, Moira, Woodside, Jayne V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9740488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36501128
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14235100
_version_ 1784848075142987776
author Watson, Sinead
O’Hara, Hannah
Reveendran, Dharsshini
Cardwell, Christopher
Murphy, Kevin G.
Benson, Tony
Dean, Moira
Woodside, Jayne V.
author_facet Watson, Sinead
O’Hara, Hannah
Reveendran, Dharsshini
Cardwell, Christopher
Murphy, Kevin G.
Benson, Tony
Dean, Moira
Woodside, Jayne V.
author_sort Watson, Sinead
collection PubMed
description Health claims on food labelling can influence peoples’ perception of food without them actually eating it, for example driving a belief that a particular food will make them feel fuller. The aim of this study was to investigate whether nutrient and health claims on food labelling can influence self-reported, and physiological indicators of, satiation. A total of 50 participants attended two visits where they were asked to consume a 380 kcal breakfast (granola and yogurt) labelled as a 500 kcal ‘indulgent’ breakfast at one visit and as a 250 kcal ‘sensible’ breakfast at the other. The order of the breakfast descriptions was randomly allocated. Participants were unaware that the two breakfasts were the same product and that only the food labels differed. At each visit blood samples were collected to measure gut hormone levels (acylated ghrelin, peptide tyrosine-tyrosine and glucagon-like peptide-1) at three time points: 20 min after arrival (baseline), after 60 min (anticipatory, immediately prior to consumption) and after 90 min (post-consumption). Visual analogue scales measuring appetite (hunger, satiety, fullness, quantity and desire to eat) were completed prior to each sample. Between 60 and 90 min, participants consumed the breakfast and rated its sensory appeal. Participants reported a higher mean change in self-reported fullness for the ‘indulgent’ than the ‘sensible’ breakfast from anticipatory to post-consumption (mean difference: 7.19 [95% CI: 0.73, 13.6]; p = 0.030). This change was not observed for the other appetite measures at the other time points or gut hormone levels. This study suggests that nutrient and health claims on food labels may influence satiation as measured by self-reported fullness. It also suggests that the observed differences in satiety scores are not due to changes in the main appetite regulating gut hormones, but are more likely centrally mediated. More high-quality trials are required to confirm these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9740488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97404882022-12-11 The Power of Suggestion: Subjective Satiety Is Affected by Nutrient and Health-Focused Food Labelling with No Effect on Physiological Gut Hormone Release Watson, Sinead O’Hara, Hannah Reveendran, Dharsshini Cardwell, Christopher Murphy, Kevin G. Benson, Tony Dean, Moira Woodside, Jayne V. Nutrients Article Health claims on food labelling can influence peoples’ perception of food without them actually eating it, for example driving a belief that a particular food will make them feel fuller. The aim of this study was to investigate whether nutrient and health claims on food labelling can influence self-reported, and physiological indicators of, satiation. A total of 50 participants attended two visits where they were asked to consume a 380 kcal breakfast (granola and yogurt) labelled as a 500 kcal ‘indulgent’ breakfast at one visit and as a 250 kcal ‘sensible’ breakfast at the other. The order of the breakfast descriptions was randomly allocated. Participants were unaware that the two breakfasts were the same product and that only the food labels differed. At each visit blood samples were collected to measure gut hormone levels (acylated ghrelin, peptide tyrosine-tyrosine and glucagon-like peptide-1) at three time points: 20 min after arrival (baseline), after 60 min (anticipatory, immediately prior to consumption) and after 90 min (post-consumption). Visual analogue scales measuring appetite (hunger, satiety, fullness, quantity and desire to eat) were completed prior to each sample. Between 60 and 90 min, participants consumed the breakfast and rated its sensory appeal. Participants reported a higher mean change in self-reported fullness for the ‘indulgent’ than the ‘sensible’ breakfast from anticipatory to post-consumption (mean difference: 7.19 [95% CI: 0.73, 13.6]; p = 0.030). This change was not observed for the other appetite measures at the other time points or gut hormone levels. This study suggests that nutrient and health claims on food labels may influence satiation as measured by self-reported fullness. It also suggests that the observed differences in satiety scores are not due to changes in the main appetite regulating gut hormones, but are more likely centrally mediated. More high-quality trials are required to confirm these findings. MDPI 2022-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9740488/ /pubmed/36501128 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14235100 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Watson, Sinead
O’Hara, Hannah
Reveendran, Dharsshini
Cardwell, Christopher
Murphy, Kevin G.
Benson, Tony
Dean, Moira
Woodside, Jayne V.
The Power of Suggestion: Subjective Satiety Is Affected by Nutrient and Health-Focused Food Labelling with No Effect on Physiological Gut Hormone Release
title The Power of Suggestion: Subjective Satiety Is Affected by Nutrient and Health-Focused Food Labelling with No Effect on Physiological Gut Hormone Release
title_full The Power of Suggestion: Subjective Satiety Is Affected by Nutrient and Health-Focused Food Labelling with No Effect on Physiological Gut Hormone Release
title_fullStr The Power of Suggestion: Subjective Satiety Is Affected by Nutrient and Health-Focused Food Labelling with No Effect on Physiological Gut Hormone Release
title_full_unstemmed The Power of Suggestion: Subjective Satiety Is Affected by Nutrient and Health-Focused Food Labelling with No Effect on Physiological Gut Hormone Release
title_short The Power of Suggestion: Subjective Satiety Is Affected by Nutrient and Health-Focused Food Labelling with No Effect on Physiological Gut Hormone Release
title_sort power of suggestion: subjective satiety is affected by nutrient and health-focused food labelling with no effect on physiological gut hormone release
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9740488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36501128
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu14235100
work_keys_str_mv AT watsonsinead thepowerofsuggestionsubjectivesatietyisaffectedbynutrientandhealthfocusedfoodlabellingwithnoeffectonphysiologicalguthormonerelease
AT oharahannah thepowerofsuggestionsubjectivesatietyisaffectedbynutrientandhealthfocusedfoodlabellingwithnoeffectonphysiologicalguthormonerelease
AT reveendrandharsshini thepowerofsuggestionsubjectivesatietyisaffectedbynutrientandhealthfocusedfoodlabellingwithnoeffectonphysiologicalguthormonerelease
AT cardwellchristopher thepowerofsuggestionsubjectivesatietyisaffectedbynutrientandhealthfocusedfoodlabellingwithnoeffectonphysiologicalguthormonerelease
AT murphykeving thepowerofsuggestionsubjectivesatietyisaffectedbynutrientandhealthfocusedfoodlabellingwithnoeffectonphysiologicalguthormonerelease
AT bensontony thepowerofsuggestionsubjectivesatietyisaffectedbynutrientandhealthfocusedfoodlabellingwithnoeffectonphysiologicalguthormonerelease
AT deanmoira thepowerofsuggestionsubjectivesatietyisaffectedbynutrientandhealthfocusedfoodlabellingwithnoeffectonphysiologicalguthormonerelease
AT woodsidejaynev thepowerofsuggestionsubjectivesatietyisaffectedbynutrientandhealthfocusedfoodlabellingwithnoeffectonphysiologicalguthormonerelease
AT watsonsinead powerofsuggestionsubjectivesatietyisaffectedbynutrientandhealthfocusedfoodlabellingwithnoeffectonphysiologicalguthormonerelease
AT oharahannah powerofsuggestionsubjectivesatietyisaffectedbynutrientandhealthfocusedfoodlabellingwithnoeffectonphysiologicalguthormonerelease
AT reveendrandharsshini powerofsuggestionsubjectivesatietyisaffectedbynutrientandhealthfocusedfoodlabellingwithnoeffectonphysiologicalguthormonerelease
AT cardwellchristopher powerofsuggestionsubjectivesatietyisaffectedbynutrientandhealthfocusedfoodlabellingwithnoeffectonphysiologicalguthormonerelease
AT murphykeving powerofsuggestionsubjectivesatietyisaffectedbynutrientandhealthfocusedfoodlabellingwithnoeffectonphysiologicalguthormonerelease
AT bensontony powerofsuggestionsubjectivesatietyisaffectedbynutrientandhealthfocusedfoodlabellingwithnoeffectonphysiologicalguthormonerelease
AT deanmoira powerofsuggestionsubjectivesatietyisaffectedbynutrientandhealthfocusedfoodlabellingwithnoeffectonphysiologicalguthormonerelease
AT woodsidejaynev powerofsuggestionsubjectivesatietyisaffectedbynutrientandhealthfocusedfoodlabellingwithnoeffectonphysiologicalguthormonerelease